|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drivencrazy
"9.3.4 Match Seeding Points
All teams on the winning ALLIANCE will receive a number of seeding points equal to the penalized score (the score with any assessed penalties) of the winning ALLIANCE.
All teams on the losing ALLIANCE will receive a number of seeding points equal to un-penalized score (the score without any assessed penalties) of the winning ALLIANCE.
9.3.5 Coopertition™ Bonus
All teams on the winning ALLIANCE will receive a coopertition bonus: a number of seeding points equal to twice the un-penalized score (the score without any assessed penalties) of the losing ALLIANCE."
If I am reading this correctly this means that the formula for the winning team A is S=P+2L
Where S is the seeding score; P is the penalized score of the winning team, and L is the un-penalized score of the losing team.
So say the Red Alliance wins over the Blue Alliance 15-0 but incurred 3 penalties.
The Red seeding score would be 15 and the Blue seeding score would be 18.
Is this correct? Am I missing something? If not I believe this to be the only downfall of this game.
|
This is correct.
It's not a downfall, though. It's like <G14> last year: making it clear that blowing out an opponent is a bad thing.
__________________
Paths a rules question takes:
Official: Post to Q&A-->GDC reviews-->Official answer posted on Q&A.
Unofficial: Post to CD-->CD views and comments, sometimes using The Manual and interpreting it-->Somebody goes the Official route -->Answer gets posted on CD eventually, as a quote from Q&A.
Which one takes longer for an official ruling? Therefore, which one makes more sense to use?
|