|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#91
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Archimedes
1. 2826, 67, 4133 2. 2056, 1114, 4334 3. 2648, 973, 2557 4. 781, 2949, 190 5. 3981, 359, 234 6. 2590, 1280, 2851 7. 195, 2046, 2415 8. 245, 1676, 1592 Galileo 1. 33, 148, 3322 2. 492. 358, 2016 3. 3173, 1671, 868 4. 180, 25, 16 5. 1718, 1918, 2337 6. 231, 744, 1714 7. 48, 1323, 1732 8. 573, 2169, 2054 |
|
#92
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Qpdated with results.
Archimedes 1. 2826, 67, 4133 F 2. 2056, 1114, 4334 W 3. 2648, 973, 2557 OF 4. 781, 2949, 190 QF 5. 3981, 359, 234 SF 6. 2590, 1218, 2851 SF 7. 195, 2046, 2415 QF 8. 245, 1676, 1592 QF Curie 1. 341, 254, 78 F 2. 233, 987, 207 W 3. 1986, 1678, 85 QF 4. 1507, 3098, 51 QF 5. 244, 624, 1885 SF 6. 3528, 1477, 1741 SF 7. 58, 2474, 525 QF 8. 27, 971, 503 QF Galileo 1. 33, 148, 3322 QF 2. 492. 358, 2016 QF 3. 3173, 1671, 868 QF 4. 180, 25, 16 W 5. 1718, 1918, 2337 QF 6. 231, 744, 1714 F 7. 48, 1323, 1732 SF 8. 573, 2169, 2054 SF Newton 1. 548, 118, 2194 W 2. 1717, 469, 2471 SF 3. 68, 330, 639 F 4. 11, 1023, 2200 QF 5, 1519, 1983, 181 SF 6. 365, 111, 1540 QF 7. 2122, 610, 488 QF 8. 1662, 2834, 3357 QF Last edited by O'Sancheski : 04-29-2012 at 01:55 PM. |
|
#93
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
1280 on Archimedes is supposed to be 1218.
Were there any declines? |
|
#94
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
I don't believe there were any declines. Probably because there were such high caliber teams ranked outside of the top 8.
|
|
#95
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
no declines on archimedes, idk about the other fields.
|
|
#96
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
No declines and, for that matter, no picks within the top 8 on Newton.
|
|
#97
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
|
|
#98
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Quote:
should be 3481, not 3981. |
|
#99
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
No, 4334 was the 2nd pick of the number 2 alliance, 4143 was the 2nd pick of the number 1 alliance.
|
|
#100
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
Apologies, I guess my fatigue made me misread both posts.
|
|
#101
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
No declines on Curie.
|
|
#102
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 Alliance Selection Results
On Galileo, 180 declined 492 and 48 declined 3173.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|