|
Re: 2006 game hints?
I know--If Dave has a disclaimer of any sort about no intentional hints (or hints of any sort, etc.), nobody analyzes that post. If there is no disclaimer, it's up for analyzing. I think we can trust Dave to not put hints in posts with disclaimers. (And the other suggested disclaimer: "Any perceived hints in this post are jokes. Analyzing them will cause great hilarity on the part of everyone other than the analyzer.")
__________________
Paths a rules question takes:
Official: Post to Q&A-->GDC reviews-->Official answer posted on Q&A.
Unofficial: Post to CD-->CD views and comments, sometimes using The Manual and interpreting it-->Somebody goes the Official route -->Answer gets posted on CD eventually, as a quote from Q&A.
Which one takes longer for an official ruling? Therefore, which one makes more sense to use?
|