OCCRA
Go to Post Mistakes happen. It's how we react to them and what we learn from them that shows what type of people we are. - Daniel_LaFleur [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Motors
CD-Events   CD-Media   CD-Spy   FRC-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-13-2011, 09:27 PM
Richard Wallace's Avatar
Richard Wallace Richard Wallace is offline
I live for the details.
FRC #3620 (Average Joes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Southwestern Michigan
Posts: 2,825
Richard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond repute
Tetrix DC Drive Motor W739083 dynamometer data

I got some of the W739083 Tetrix motors (12V, 152 RPM marking) to test in my lab. We performed dynamometer tests to measure the output mechanical power vs. torque, for two types of electrical source: (1) a regulated 12V laboratory bench supply, and (2) a standard 12V (marked) W739057 Tetrix NiMH battery pack. We did not measure the battery voltage; however, the (unloaded) initial motor speed when fed from the battery probably indicates variation of its voltage due to the previous test. Some charging was done between tests.

We repeated the power curve measurements for four sample motors. Three showed consistent performance, and one was slightly lower. Results follow:

----------------

With regulated 12V dc supply:

Motor 1: 10.8 Watts peak output mechanical power at ~75 RPM, 145 RPM initial motor speed
Motor 2: 10.8 Watts peak output mechanical power at ~75 RPM, 145 RPM initial motor speed
Motor 3: 10.1 Watts peak output mechanical power at ~75 RPM, 143 RPM initial motor speed
Motor 4: 10.9 Watts peak output mechanical power at ~75 RPM, 148 RPM initial motor speed

With Tetrix battery: (voltage > 14V)

Motor 1: 16.5 Watts peak output mechanical power at ~90 RPM, 178 RPM initial motor speed
Motor 2: 16.0 Watts peak output mechanical power at ~90 RPM, 173 RPM initial motor speed
Motor 3: 14.2 Watts peak output mechanical power at ~90 RPM, 172 RPM initial motor speed
Motor 4: 15.2 Watts peak output mechanical power at ~90 RPM, 176 RPM initial motor speed

------------------

Based on the above, my calculations for climbing time and gear ratio would yield a recommendation for 4" wheels and 2:1 gearing, for a (theoretical) climbing time of about 3 sec if we assume the minibot mass is 5 lb, two motors are used, and the mechanical efficiency (motor shafts to pole) is 75%. That mechanical efficiency might be about right, considering that my dynomometer measurements did not include any side loading on the motor shaft, which will certainly be present in the minibot.

Of course your motors may vary from the ones we tested. However, two general conclusions are still valid:

(1) Battery state of charge will be a very significant factor for minimizing climbing time. So will mechanical losses in the power train from motor shafts to pole.

(2) Design calculations based on the published motor data are likely to be too conservative; my calculations using the published data would yield a recommendation for 3" wheels, while the test data above suggests that 4" wheels are a better choice.

NOTE: I wanted to include the raw data and plots of speed and power vs. torque; however, they cannot be attached to this post because the file size is too large (>101.8 kB).

---------------

Test Temperature: Ambient (22 degrees C)
Software: M-Test 5.0
Dynamometer: Magtrol HD 705-6N (Calibrated 01/12/2011 by NT)
Dyno Controller: Magtrol 4629B (ML144)
Power Supply: Sorensen XG 150-11.2
__________________
Richard
Whirlpool Corporation, Benton Harbor, Michigan
Mentor since 2011 for FRC 3620 Average Joes (St. Joseph, Michigan)
Mentor since 2002 for FRC 931 Perpetual Chaos (St. Louis, Missouri)
since 2003


I believe in intuition and inspiration. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research.
(Cosmic Religion : With Other Opinions and Aphorisms (1931) by Albert Einstein, p. 97
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-13-2011, 09:37 PM
Unsung FIRST Hero
Ed Sparks Ed Sparks is offline
Engineer/Mentor/Inspector
AKA: FirstCadLibrary Guy, Inspector Dude
FRC #3959 (Formally with FRC-34)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 588
Ed Sparks has a reputation beyond reputeEd Sparks has a reputation beyond reputeEd Sparks has a reputation beyond reputeEd Sparks has a reputation beyond reputeEd Sparks has a reputation beyond reputeEd Sparks has a reputation beyond reputeEd Sparks has a reputation beyond reputeEd Sparks has a reputation beyond reputeEd Sparks has a reputation beyond reputeEd Sparks has a reputation beyond reputeEd Sparks has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Ed Sparks Send a message via Yahoo to Ed Sparks
Re: Tetrix DC Drive Motor W739083 dynamometer data

Nice !

Thanks Richard for doing this test and sharing.
__________________
Ed Sparks

MECH TECH FRC-3959
FirstCadLibrary
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-13-2011, 09:54 PM
Unsung FIRST Hero
Greg Needel Greg Needel is offline
REVving up for a new season
FRC #2848 (All-sparks)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,906
Greg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Greg Needel Send a message via Skype™ to Greg Needel
Re: Tetrix DC Drive Motor W739083 dynamometer data

Thanks for the testing Richard.

For reference here are the published specs for the motor as taken from the PTC curriculum which uses tetrix.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf TETRIX Drive Motor Performance-1.pdf (774.0 KB, 1641 views)
__________________
Greg Needel│www.robogreg.com
Co-founder REV Robotics LLC www.REVrobotics.com
2014 FRC World Champions with 254, 469, & 74
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-13-2011, 09:58 PM
big1boom big1boom is offline
Chains=Fun
FRC #2022 (Titan Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Aurora
Posts: 267
big1boom is a glorious beacon of lightbig1boom is a glorious beacon of lightbig1boom is a glorious beacon of lightbig1boom is a glorious beacon of lightbig1boom is a glorious beacon of lightbig1boom is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Tetrix DC Drive Motor W739083 dynamometer data

3 seconds seems about right. We have 2 separate designs that travel up the pole between 2.7 sec and 3.1 sec. (depending on who is running the stopwatch)

My initial calculations stated that we could make it up in a little less than 3 seconds, so it seems that the JVN Calculator was accurate.

So, summary
4lbs bot
2:1 gear ratio
2.7 second climb time
__________________
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-13-2011, 11:42 PM
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
back to school ;-)
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 7,921
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Tetrix DC Drive Motor W739083 dynamometer data

Like Richard, I too live for the details. Thank you Richard for stepping up to gather and provide this information for all teams. You really have a full grasp on the spirit of this competition.
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004

Purchase Cree LED Bulbs from the Team 696 Online Store
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2011, 01:00 AM
LH Machinist LH Machinist is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North East
Posts: 48
LH Machinist has a spectacular aura aboutLH Machinist has a spectacular aura aboutLH Machinist has a spectacular aura about
Re: Tetrix DC Drive Motor W739083 dynamometer data

Thanks for the information. However, it doesn't make sense in my mechanical mind...using a 2 to 1 gear reduction with 4" wheels. An unloaded motor runs @ 178 RPM, (2.96 revolutions second) multiplying this by the circumference of a 4" wheel. 2.96 x 12.56 = 37.17 inches per second. Based upon the math and considering the load will reduce RPM, +/- 3 seconds is plausible.

If the RPM is reduced by 1/2. +/- 6 seconds seems like the time to reach the top.

Am I missing something?
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2011, 05:18 AM
Richard Wallace's Avatar
Richard Wallace Richard Wallace is offline
I live for the details.
FRC #3620 (Average Joes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Southwestern Michigan
Posts: 2,825
Richard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Tetrix DC Drive Motor W739083 dynamometer data

Quote:
Originally Posted by LH Machinist View Post
Thanks for the information. However, it doesn't make sense in my mechanical mind...using a 2 to 1 gear reduction with 4" wheels. ... Am I missing something?
Sorry, I should have expressed that a little more clearly.

I meant a 2:1 speed INCREASE from motor shaft to wheel. Effectively making a 4" wheel behave like an 8" wheel mounted directly on the motor shaft.

Here's how I did the math:

Climb height = 110 inch (2.79 meter)

Energy = height X weight = height X mass X g

Energy (Joule) = height (meter) X mass (kg) X 9.8 m/sec^2

Example: if mass is 5 lb (2.27 kg) then energy = 62.2 Joule

Maximum motor output power (assuming a full Tetrix battery) is about 15 Watt at 90 RPM -- operating at different RPM will REDUCE the power.

Time to climb = Energy / Climbing Power

Climbing Power = Motor Power X drivetrain efficiency

If drivetrain efficiency is 75% and two motors are used, then Climbing Power is 30 X .75 = 22.5 Watt. So, Time to Climb is 62.2 / 22.5 = 2.8 seconds, and climbing speed is 110 inch / 2.8 sec = 39.8 inch/sec. If 4 inch diameter wheels are used, then wheel speed is 39.8 / 4*pi = 3.2 rev/sec = 190 RPM. To match this wheel speed to the 90 RPM motor speed, the gear ratio is 190/90 or ~2.
__________________
Richard
Whirlpool Corporation, Benton Harbor, Michigan
Mentor since 2011 for FRC 3620 Average Joes (St. Joseph, Michigan)
Mentor since 2002 for FRC 931 Perpetual Chaos (St. Louis, Missouri)
since 2003


I believe in intuition and inspiration. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research.
(Cosmic Religion : With Other Opinions and Aphorisms (1931) by Albert Einstein, p. 97

Last edited by Richard Wallace : 01-14-2011 at 05:23 AM.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2011, 09:02 AM
boomergeek's Avatar
boomergeek boomergeek is offline
Registered User
AKA: Mr. D (Dick DiPasquale)
FRC #0241 (Pinkerton Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Derry, NH
Posts: 191
boomergeek has a brilliant futureboomergeek has a brilliant futureboomergeek has a brilliant futureboomergeek has a brilliant futureboomergeek has a brilliant futureboomergeek has a brilliant futureboomergeek has a brilliant futureboomergeek has a brilliant futureboomergeek has a brilliant futureboomergeek has a brilliant futureboomergeek has a brilliant future
Re: Tetrix DC Drive Motor W739083 dynamometer data

Great information on motors/drivetrain for the minibot! Thanks!

Some rough analysis by FIRST Team 241 of the video at the Kickoff: The running bot seemed to have:
1) direct drive
2) 3" wheels
3) two motors


It also seemed to climb the entire length of the tower in just under 5 seconds.

That would seem to imply PI*3" per revolution = 9.4" or 12-13 revolutions in 5 seconds or about 144 RPM under load of the minibot.

We don't have the ftc-020 First Choice kit yet and the abbreviated list of parts does not detail the wheels included. I see a grainy picture associated with the kit but I really could not make out 4" wheels.

---

We plan to run experiments as soon as we get the kit. Hopefully we will get them soon.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	minibot.jpg
Views:	234
Size:	116.9 KB
ID:	9676  
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2011, 10:10 AM
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Flybotix Fanatic
FRC #1885 (iLITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 2,920
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Tetrix DC Drive Motor W739083 dynamometer data

Thanks for the data Richard!

4"x1:1 versus 3"x1:2

(4"x1:1 is a 4" wheel with a 1:1 ratio, direct driven; 3"x1:2 is a 3" wheel with a 80T gear on the motor and a 40T gear on the wheel)

Since mass will affect every race, is the added mass to get a 1:2 gearing on a 3" wheel worth the complexity versus a direct drive 4" wheel? I don't think so. My charts show that a 3"x1:2 is only 0.1 seconds faster than a 4"x1:1 since adding gears adds weight (gear mounting, extra axle primarily). I'd suggest trying it with both and seeing what you gain from the flexibility in the design from 4"x1:1.

Edit -- Whoops -- the calculator didn't factor in another efficiency drop due to the extra gears -- so now 3"x2:1 is just on par with 4"x1:1.

Last edited by JesseK : 01-14-2011 at 10:16 AM.
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-18-2011, 01:52 PM
colin340 colin340 is offline
team person man
AKA: Colin Nobles
FRC #0340 (G.R.R)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: May 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: rochester
Posts: 422
colin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to colin340
Re: Tetrix DC Drive Motor W739083 dynamometer data

so from what I see everyone is planning on a tall gear ratio (to theoretically increase wheel diameter)

I am very uneducated on electrical motor performance but so far I thought Max performance was somewhere near the motors free speed (although I do understand you get full torque at any RPM assuming your motor does not burn up) if this was the case wouldn't you want a shorter ratio than 1:1 essentially creating a slower and higher torque drivetrain to ensure the motor was operating at peak RPM.

I'm pretty sure I'm wrong based on Richard statements
__________________
61 77 77 20 77 69 74 74 6c 65 20 62 61 62 79 20 63 6f 6e 64 6f 72 20 69 73 20 72 65 61 64 69 6e 67 20 43 44
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-18-2011, 02:10 PM
EricVanWyk EricVanWyk is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,596
EricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to EricVanWyk
Re: Tetrix DC Drive Motor W739083 dynamometer data

Quote:
Originally Posted by colin340 View Post
so from what I see everyone is planning on a tall gear ratio (to theoretically increase wheel diameter)

I am very uneducated on electrical motor performance but so far I thought Max performance was somewhere near the motors free speed (although I do understand you get full torque at any RPM assuming your motor does not burn up) if this was the case wouldn't you want a shorter ratio than 1:1 essentially creating a slower and higher torque drivetrain to ensure the motor was operating at peak RPM.

I'm pretty sure I'm wrong based on Richard statements
Colin -

You are likely thinking of a different type of motor. Maybe an internal combustion engine?* DC motors behave very very differently.

Take a look at the spec Greg posted, it will clear things up.

For a given voltage, a DC motor has the most Power output at about half of its free speed. Torque is highest at stall, and decreases linearly to zero torque at free speed.



* My knowledge of combustion engines is pretty close to zero, but I think wenkels have performance like you suggest: http://4wings.com.phtemp.com/crafts/a2con/torque.jpg
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-18-2011, 02:37 PM
colin340 colin340 is offline
team person man
AKA: Colin Nobles
FRC #0340 (G.R.R)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: May 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: rochester
Posts: 422
colin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to colin340
Re: Tetrix DC Drive Motor W739083 dynamometer data

after looking at the graphs for the thousand time I sort of understand how to read them I see that maximum efficiency at 88 RPMs

I had the idea about Max torque at zero RPMs from electric dragsters
But I guess that doesn't translate maybe brushless motors?
Anyhow I'll gear it to hopefully bog to 88 RPMs
Thanks for all help folks just goes to show 20 years of school rarely matches up to simply asking a question and accepting that you are clueless in the subject.

ps Wankel's are awesome i Have a snowmobile with one
__________________
61 77 77 20 77 69 74 74 6c 65 20 62 61 62 79 20 63 6f 6e 64 6f 72 20 69 73 20 72 65 61 64 69 6e 67 20 43 44
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-18-2011, 02:37 PM
EricVanWyk EricVanWyk is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,596
EricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to EricVanWyk
Re: Tetrix DC Drive Motor W739083 dynamometer data

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
...
Wow, thanks Richard!

Could you please post a little info on how you got the data? I might make a few freshman recreate this data.

Also, would you mind emailing me the raw data?
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-20-2011, 01:28 AM
Dr Fritz's Avatar
Dr Fritz Dr Fritz is offline
Registered User
AKA: Fritzelin
FRC #1165 (Team Paridise)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 65
Dr Fritz has a spectacular aura aboutDr Fritz has a spectacular aura aboutDr Fritz has a spectacular aura about
Re: Tetrix DC Drive Motor W739083 dynamometer data

Great work. thanks for the test and info
__________________
ph.D Asskickanomics
Magnets work well
Thor Protector of Man kind

Raise your swords up high
See the black birds fly
Let them hear your rage
Show no fear
"Our Mini-bot goes 'clink-whee"
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-21-2011, 12:30 PM
Richard Wallace's Avatar
Richard Wallace Richard Wallace is offline
I live for the details.
FRC #3620 (Average Joes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Southwestern Michigan
Posts: 2,825
Richard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Tetrix DC Drive Motor W739083 dynamometer data

Some folks here on CD have asked for a bit more data, so I am adding it here.

We used another of our dynamometers to measure mechanical output and efficiency for two of the Textric DC Drive motors (units 2 and 3 from the original post), with their gearheads removed. This gives some insight to the electrical and mechanical power losses.

At 12V dc, these two motors developed peak shaft powers ~ 17.6 and 15.8 Watts, respectively -- this is about 7 Watts more than was measured when the motors were tested with gearheads. That difference is the mechanical power loss in the gearhead, at peak loading.

Also, at peak shaft powers these two motors showed electromechanical efficiencies ~ 45% and 40%, respectively. In other words, motor 2 consumed 17.6 / 0.45 = 39 Watts, and motor 3 consumed 15.8 / 0.4 = 39.5 Watts, from the 12V dc supply. So motor 2 wasted 39 - 17.6 = 21.4 Watts, and motor 3 wasted 39.5 - 15.8 = 23.7 Watts, due to heating of their respective armature windings. These are the motors' electrical losses.

My conclusion -- teams might gain an advantage in climbing power by replacing the gearheads on these motors with more mechanically efficient alternatives, but the potential benefit is probably only a few Watts (my guess is 2 to 4 Watts). The time a team would spend refitting Tetrix motors with more efficient gearheads is probably better spent working on faster minibot deployment methods.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Tetrix_Without_Gear.pdf (46.6 KB, 787 views)
__________________
Richard
Whirlpool Corporation, Benton Harbor, Michigan
Mentor since 2011 for FRC 3620 Average Joes (St. Joseph, Michigan)
Mentor since 2002 for FRC 931 Perpetual Chaos (St. Louis, Missouri)
since 2003


I believe in intuition and inspiration. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research.
(Cosmic Religion : With Other Opinions and Aphorisms (1931) by Albert Einstein, p. 97
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 AM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi