OCCRA
Go to Post Brandon, can you make some sort of mind-reading device that i can just think "portal" and i'll go back? - Tom Schindler [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Regional Competitions
CD-Events   CD-Media   CD-Spy   FRC-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-05-2005, 11:30 PM
Sachiel7's Avatar
Sachiel7 Sachiel7 is offline
<Yes I managed to flip it
AKA: Shayne Helms
FRC #1132 (RAPTAR Robotics)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 541
Sachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to Sachiel7
Awards at Regionals

OK, I thought I'd bring this topic up, because it is an interesting one, and I'd like a little feedback from others.

First off, this thread is not intended to flame anyone.
It is also not intended to negatively claim against any team - PERIOD. I tip my hat to everyones accomplishments.

Now, here's the deal.

What we've been noticing (at least over here at VCU) is that each year (for at least the 4 years I've been involved) the same core of about 3-4 teams is being awarded at least *something* if not the higher end awards, or multiple awards every year

Now, taking a immediate step back. I STRONGLY believe that these teams did deserve the awards, don't get me wrong. This is also (personally) not about our team, we were not focusing on awards too much this year, but wanted to share these observations, and these were also observed by other teams. My team is not alone here

First off, the biggest thing that we can't understand is that if VCU is the *largest* regional out of the 30 regionals (yet again) with 62 (WOW!) teams attending this year, why is it that very few (I think 8-10ish) teams are receiving awards? Mainly, the issue was that there were many teams who received multiple awards this year. Out of the 19-ish awards (that didn't involve competition performance) there were many teams receiving, 2,3 awards. The other thing is that out of the 8-10 ish teams who did receive them, 3-4 have been getting stuff like this constantly from year to year.

Now, I still stress that I agree with the judges decision, and that everyone earned their awards through hard work, and deserved them.

Here's the dilemma. There are many teams out there right now who aren't being recognized because of their age. In other words, many of the older vets (3 digits) are constantly picking up the same awards from year to year. They know what FIRST wants to see. That's good! Keep up the outstanding work! But there are also teams in the mid-range (1000-1300-ish) that seem overstepped a bit because you've got the vets down low who know what they're doing, and he rookies up high, who have their own awards, and ALSO are great at earning themselves some of the other awards (go rookies! WOOO!) but the mid-range has been all-but lost (cept for a few of us. 2 at VCU, I think), even when the team's efforts are quite a strong effort.

I'm not sure how things could change. The idea I've heard being passed around is limiting the maximum number of awards you can receive at a regional event. We could have had 19 different teams receive awards. Instead, we had about 8 (42% of the possible maximum).

Another topic going around regards some of the higher-end design awards, and several of the prestigious awards. Some teams I've talked to have issues with the same crowd gaining these in consecutive years. The issue comes in when you debate limiting this ability however.

For rough example, FIRST does not want to say to teams "you can't receive an X award again at the same regional if you've already been awarded this, or, you have to wait X years before you're eligible again". They do not want to limit teams from continuing their efforts in the areas that these awards notice (IE, changing your community, school, etc.) However, it is getting to the point now where I have heard say of "why bother?" because of the same groups being recognized repeatedly.

My concern is that in the long run, more teams may stray away from pursuing behaviour toward awards (which involves spreading FIRST into our world), simply because they feel that they didn't have a chance. What kind of example to we want to set for our rookies? I think if FIRST found at least some small way to limit awards that still was fair to everyone, that would boost the efforts of many teams in the area.

So, to close, on behalf of 1132, I would like to congratulate every single team for their accomplishments this season, especially at VCU. Every team deserved what they earned. Lets get out there and do some more!
__________________
-=Sachiel7=-

There's no such thing as being too simple!
Look for Team #1132, RAPTAR Robotics at the VCU Regional this year!
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rookie Regionals rachakate Regional Competitions 5 03-23-2004 11:01 PM
Hey FIRST - We're going to need a lot more regionals! Raul Regional Competitions 41 11-08-2003 05:10 PM
FIRSTStar(TM) Rating Joe Johnson General Forum 36 05-03-2002 10:39 AM
The awards for Buckeye and Lonestar Regionals A. Snodgrass Regional Competitions 12 03-19-2002 10:34 AM
VCU and KSC regionals Manoel Regional Competitions 0 09-25-2001 12:44 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 PM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi