OCCRA
Go to Post oooh tight leather bumpers...sexy! - Nuttyman54 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Events   CD-Media   CD-Spy   FRC-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-18-2005, 07:56 PM
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
back to school ;-)
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 7,875
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: If you could change one rule

I'd say the rule about actually touching the loading zone triangle was pointless. It made so many nice robots look very cheap with zip ties and junk hanging off the front. If a robot is clearly over it, then it would be touching it if something was hanging down, regardless of that something existing or not. Plus, what is easier for a referee to look at? A whole frame rail or bumper of a robot being over it? Or the tip of a minuscule thread or zip tie touching it?

And also I would never design a game where a single penalty due to an action committed by one robot can easily change the outcome of what would have been a very strong win for the alliance.

EDIT:

Hrrm, this post shouldn't have been included in the split from that other thread. It belongs there.

EDIT2: A better thread title would be "Should teams push themselves to make higher quality robots?"
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004

Purchase Cree LED Bulbs from the Team 696 Online Store

Last edited by sanddrag : 10-18-2005 at 10:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-18-2005, 08:59 PM
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
back to school ;-)
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 7,875
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: If you could change one rule

No Dave, see without threaded fasteners you'd have to allow tape again

Anyway, I think a rule that somehow stepped up quality in robots would be a nice thing (the no tape rule is a great start). I am aware that not every team has a 4 axis CNC mill (or any mill) or a Miller TIG welder (or any welder) or a whole tool chest full of nothing but the finest, however I've seen a lot of robots that are just kind of "barely hanging on" in the way of quality. I know almost every team is proud of their robot no matter what it looks like and they have every right to be. But I think outsiders tend to be more impressed with the CNCed, TIGed, water jetted, anodized, and powder coated machines that have been fully designed in CAD first. I'm not saying every robot should be as elaborate as that, but I think some sort of motivation needs to be given to teams to step into the world of professional grade quality fabrication.
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004

Purchase Cree LED Bulbs from the Team 696 Online Store
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-18-2005, 09:19 PM
Tyler 783's Avatar
Tyler 783 Tyler 783 is offline
Tyler 783
AKA: Tyler Stevens
FRC #0783 (Mobotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 26
Tyler 783 will become famous soon enough
Re: If you could change one rule

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
No Dave, see without threaded fasteners you'd have to allow tape again

Anyway, I think a rule that somehow stepped up quality in robots would be a nice thing (the no tape rule is a great start). I am aware that not every team has a 4 axis CNC mill (or any mill) or a Miller TIG welder (or any welder) or a whole tool chest full of nothing but the finest, however I've seen a lot of robots that are just kind of "barely hanging on" in the way of quality. I know almost every team is proud of their robot no matter what it looks like and they have every right to be. But I think outsiders tend to be more impressed with the CNCed, TIGed, water jetted, anodized, and powder coated machines that have been fully designed in CAD first. I'm not saying every robot should be as elaborate as that, but I think some sort of motivation needs to be given to teams to step into the world of professional grade quality fabrication.

There is a slight problem with some how making a rule to make it manditory for the robots to look nice. This is because there are alot of team who can't get the funding they need. I remember last year my team spent 200 man hours looking for sponsors, and 400 man hours doing fund raisers and geting $2500 canadian, and no were to build the robot, we eventualy decided to bring it into someone's basment and build it with hand tools and a drill press. Believe me if I had the time to worry about making it look CnC quality I would have, but when your only saw is a hack saw and your only drill is a $20 special, making a competitive robot that looks pretty is kind of hard. For a rule like you are sugesting fesible FIRST would have to provide fabrication equipment to teams without it. Which would be nice, I could go for a CnC mill in my basement.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-18-2005, 09:25 PM
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,324
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: If you could change one rule

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
No Dave, see without threaded fasteners you'd have to allow tape again

Anyway, I think a rule that somehow stepped up quality in robots would be a nice thing (the no tape rule is a great start). I am aware that not every team has a 4 axis CNC mill (or any mill) or a Miller TIG welder (or any welder) or a whole tool chest full of nothing but the finest, however I've seen a lot of robots that are just kind of "barely hanging on" in the way of quality. I know almost every team is proud of their robot no matter what it looks like and they have every right to be. But I think outsiders tend to be more impressed with the CNCed, TIGed, water jetted, anodized, and powder coated machines that have been fully designed in CAD first. I'm not saying every robot should be as elaborate as that, but I think some sort of motivation needs to be given to teams to step into the world of professional grade quality fabrication.
Everytime you bring up this topic, I don't see where you're heading.

The point of FIRST is not to create pretty robots. It's to teach kids about science, technology, and engineering.

In the sequence of events leading up to a FIRST competition, whether or not I was able to anodize or powdercoat my robot is entirely irrelevant to me. Making the robot look nice and professional does absolutely nothing towards inspiring kids and teaching them about the aforementioned topics.

You're focusing entirely on the robot. The robot is a means to an end. That end is not to make the most killer robot ever, or to make it look like it just came off the Ferarri showroom's floor.

FIRST doesn't exist for the benefit of outsiders who happen to attend competitions. These are machines being created by high school kids in six weeks. I wouldn't expect them to look professional.

If you're one of the teams that has time to make your bot look all spiffy, great, more power to you, but it should most definitely not be a priority when there's hundreds of teams that struggle just to field a reasonably competitive robot.

I'd much rather see an incentive to make people take the path less traveled, in order to create more inspiration.
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-18-2005, 09:40 PM
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
back to school ;-)
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 7,875
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: If you could change one rule

Where I was going with that is that I feel that some teams are satisfied with what they have when I know they can strive for more. I know there are teams that try their absolute hardest to get sponsors and they don't and try their absolute hardest to build a functioning robot and can't and try their absolute hardest to win and come in last place. That is perfectly okay. But I also know some teams that don't care worth a darn if their robot even gets finished much less what it looks like and I think they are cheating themselves. If you could use a milling machine instead of a cordless drill would you? If you could write a program to make the robot easier to drive rather than having the driver struggle with the joysticks would you? If you could measure with calipers instead of a tape measure would you? If you could have custom aluminum wheels instead of the same ones that come in every kit would you? If you could have engineers help you would you let them? If you could go to two regionals instead of one would you? Sadly (imho) many teams answer "no" to some or several of the above questions. And it is not a matter of being able to do it; it is a matter of wanting to do it. I think too many teams say "eh, one regional is okay" or "eh, the cordless drill works fine" instead of saying "we CAN fundraise to go to two regionals" and "we CAN find a sponsor with a milling machine" etc etc.

Plain and simple, I think some teams don't try hard enough.

Basically, I guess I just have a "good enough isn't" philosophy and I believe too many teams are too content with their situations and not striving for more as they should be.

Sorry for the detour, now back to the thread...
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004

Purchase Cree LED Bulbs from the Team 696 Online Store

Last edited by sanddrag : 10-18-2005 at 09:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-18-2005, 10:00 PM
Arefin Bari's Avatar
Arefin Bari Arefin Bari is offline
Registered User
AKA: Ari
FRC #0108 (SigmaC@T)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Ft. lauderdale, FL
Posts: 3,216
Arefin Bari has a reputation beyond reputeArefin Bari has a reputation beyond reputeArefin Bari has a reputation beyond reputeArefin Bari has a reputation beyond reputeArefin Bari has a reputation beyond reputeArefin Bari has a reputation beyond reputeArefin Bari has a reputation beyond reputeArefin Bari has a reputation beyond reputeArefin Bari has a reputation beyond reputeArefin Bari has a reputation beyond reputeArefin Bari has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to Arefin Bari Send a message via AIM to Arefin Bari Send a message via MSN to Arefin Bari Send a message via Yahoo to Arefin Bari
Re: If you could change one rule

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
Plain and simple, I think some teams don't try hard enough.
I hate to go offtopic, but if you are telling me that it's a "fact," I beg to differ. There is no way in heck teams don't try hard enough. I am good friends with almost every single team in Florida as well as some teams in different states. Do you know how many times I get messages asking me, "What can I do to keep the team going?" You simply don't say that a team doesn't try hard enough. There are many students on the team. I can understand if you tell me that every single student don't try hard enough. But there are atleast 10 who dies for the team. They try their best. I don't think any team in FIRST will say, "No, we don't want a mill, we can just use a cordless drill." There are teams out there who are in need of money, they are trying their best out there.

Let me give you a good example which you will see happening this coming season. Two teams that I know and work closely with has about 500 bucks on their account. 6,000 bucks is due on December 9th. Watch them raise the money and go out there to compete.

Now back to the topic. I am personally happy with the rules. No matter what, you are going to be unhappy about certain things and think what if it was the other way. That's life. Keep in mind, FIRST works their butt off to come up with every single rule and tries to satisfy all teams.
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-18-2005, 10:04 PM
Adam Richards's Avatar
Adam Richards Adam Richards is offline
I'm baaaaaaack.
FRC #1902 (Exploding Bacon)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,062
Adam Richards has a reputation beyond reputeAdam Richards has a reputation beyond reputeAdam Richards has a reputation beyond reputeAdam Richards has a reputation beyond reputeAdam Richards has a reputation beyond reputeAdam Richards has a reputation beyond reputeAdam Richards has a reputation beyond reputeAdam Richards has a reputation beyond reputeAdam Richards has a reputation beyond reputeAdam Richards has a reputation beyond reputeAdam Richards has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Adam Richards Send a message via Skype™ to Adam Richards
Re: If you could change one rule

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
Where I was going with that is that I feel that some teams are satisfied with what they have when I know they can strive for more.
Then you should approach the teams and let them know on a personal basis, giving them suggestions to help them achieve what you believe they are capable of.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
But I also know some teams that don't care worth a darn if their robot even gets finished much less what it looks like and I think they are cheating themselves.
Really? Could you elaborate on which teams actually think this, and also give some reasons why they do that? I'd like to ask them myself to see what they have to say on it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
If you could use a milling machine instead of a cordless drill would you? If you could write a program to make the robot easier to drive rather than having the driver struggle with the joysticks would you? If you could measure with calipers instead of a tape measure would you? If you could have custom aluminum wheels instead of the same ones that come in every kit would you? If you could have engineers help you would you let them? If you could go to two regionals instead of one would you?
Yes to all of those, though many teams don't have the resources that you seem to think they do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
Sadly (imho) many teams answer "no" to some or several of the above questions.
Many? I've never come across a single team in my time in FIRST that has ever declined things like that. Also, shouldn't the team's answers be based upon their factual statements, not your "honest" opinion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
And it is not a matter of being able to do it; it is a matter of wanting to do it. I think too many teams say "eh, one regional is okay" or "eh, the cordless drill works fine" instead of saying "we CAN fundraise to go to two regionals" and "we CAN find a sponsor with a milling machine" etc etc.

Plain and simple, I think some teams don't try hard enough.
And this is their choice. It is not our position to judge others and what they believe to be best for their own team. You can not make a blanket statement that teams don't try hard enough without having a grasp on the situation of over 1,000 teams.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
Basically, I guess I just have a "good enough isn't" philosophy and I believe too many teams are too content with their situations and not striving for more as they should be.
Again, this is THEIR CHOICE. You can't force them to go out every week and search for sponsors. You can't force them to fundraise more. People from some teams that I've talked to can't fundraise directly because of school rules, while others don't have the resources in their towns to fundraise. What do you think should happen to these teams if they don't "try hard enough" by your standards? Do you believe that they should be removed from the program, just because they aren't supporting an elitist, best-of-the-best attitude that you believe FIRST should have?
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-18-2005, 10:04 PM
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,324
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: If you could change one rule

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
Plain and simple, I think some teams don't try hard enough.
Who are you to define whether a team is "trying hard enough" (which btw, is perhaps the most subjective thing ever)?

If it doesn't bother the other team, then why does it bother you?

I suggest you spend less time worrying about how other people run their teams, and instead improve your own to the best of your abilities
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-18-2005, 10:22 PM
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
back to school ;-)
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 7,875
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: If you could change one rule

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory
Who are you to define whether a team is "trying hard enough"

I suggest you spend less time worrying about how other people run their teams, and instead improve your own to the best of your abilities
And who are you to advise how I spend my time? Gotcha!, lol

Anywhoo, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I have mine, you have yours, and our differences are what keeps this world spinning.

Now, I urge everyone to address the topic "If you could change one rule"

EDIT: nevermind the above line, the discussion has been split. Carry on if you wish...
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004

Purchase Cree LED Bulbs from the Team 696 Online Store

Last edited by sanddrag : 10-18-2005 at 10:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-18-2005, 10:33 PM
C.Roberts 1089's Avatar
C.Roberts 1089 C.Roberts 1089 is offline
loves 6 flags great adventure =).
AKA: Carli
FRC #1089 (Mercury)
Team Role: Human Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: East Windsor, NJ (central jersey)
Posts: 59
C.Roberts 1089 has a brilliant futureC.Roberts 1089 has a brilliant futureC.Roberts 1089 has a brilliant futureC.Roberts 1089 has a brilliant futureC.Roberts 1089 has a brilliant futureC.Roberts 1089 has a brilliant futureC.Roberts 1089 has a brilliant futureC.Roberts 1089 has a brilliant futureC.Roberts 1089 has a brilliant futureC.Roberts 1089 has a brilliant futureC.Roberts 1089 has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to C.Roberts 1089
Re: Should teams be pushed to make higher quality robots?

Sanddrag - If you're saying Cory doesn't have the right to "advise you how to spend your time," then you don't have the right to advise others. Since you obviously didn't appreciate him giving you suggestions, what makes you think anyone else wants to hear yours? Isn't that a bit hypocritical of you? Why is Cory offering you a suggestion any different than you offering some to anyone else? You apparently felt it was appropriate to do so, so what makes it any different when Cory does it? Only difference that I can see is that Cory's got a year of experience on you, which argues more for him than you.
__________________
Proud member of aNJ team!
This year find me at...
NJ Regional
Saturday of the Philly Regional
NATIONALS!

2006
NJ Regional Website Award Winner
NJ Regional J&J Sportsmanship Award Winner

Are you a MAVERICK?
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-18-2005, 10:42 PM
mechanicalbrain's Avatar
mechanicalbrain mechanicalbrain is offline
The red haired Dremel gnome!
FRC #0623 (Ohm robotics)
Team Role: Electrical
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,221
mechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to mechanicalbrain Send a message via Yahoo to mechanicalbrain
Re: Should teams be pushed to make higher quality robots?

OK now that were done banging on Sanddrag and while yes I don't exactly agree lets consider some aspects that were fair. I think one problem (ill speak for my team to be fair but Ive heard the same complaint from others) is that a bunch of FIRSTers don't care. I don't think its necessarily on the team as a whole level but from our team (and again I speak of mine only) I know that a majority of students tend to slack and you end up with a few students who shoulder allot of the work. This tends to decrees our robots professionalism level by a couple notches. I know our team plans on asking slackers to leave but I wonder if this deprives them of the chance to mend their ways and learn. Ideas, comments, personal experiences anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-18-2005, 10:47 PM
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,324
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: Should teams be pushed to make higher quality robots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mechanicalbrain
OK now that were done banging on Sanddrag and while yes I don't exactly agree lets consider some aspects that were fair. I think one problem (ill speak for my team to be fair but Ive heard the same complaint from others) is that a bunch of FIRSTers don't care. I don't think its necessarily on the team as a whole level but from our team (and again I speak of mine only) I know that a majority of students tend to slack and you end up with a few students who shoulder allot of the work. This tends to decrees our robots professionalism level by a couple notches. I know our team plans on asking slackers to leave but I wonder if this deprives them of the chance to mend their ways and learn. Ideas, comments, personal experiences anyone?
If they don't care, they either a) shouldn't be in the program, or b) mentors should go to further lengths to try and show them the light. B. should be your focus much more than making a pretty robot should be.
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-18-2005, 10:51 PM
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
back to school ;-)
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 7,875
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Should teams be pushed to make higher quality robots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by C.Roberts 1089
Sanddrag - If you're saying Cory doesn't have the right to "advise you how to spend your time," then you don't have the right to advise others.
I suppose not. I only offer my opinions. Take them however you please. I am not a licensed practitioner.
Quote:
Originally Posted by C.Roberts 1089
Since you obviously didn't appreciate him giving you suggestions, what makes you think anyone else wants to hear yours?
Did I ever say anyone else wanted to hear (read) my ideas? I don't post because people want me to, I post because I want to. And maybe once in a blue moon someone will like to catch a ride on my one man caravan.
Quote:
Originally Posted by C.Roberts 1089
Isn't that a bit hypocritical of you?
See above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by C.Roberts 1089
Why is Cory offering you a suggestion any different than you offering some to anyone else? You apparently felt it was appropriate to do so, so what makes it any different when Cory does it?
umm, nothing? no difference. did I say there was one? suggestions flying all around. Some liked, some diskliked, some useless, some on the contrary, some in accordance. Did I miss something?
Quote:
Originally Posted by C.Roberts 1089
Only difference that I can see is that Cory's got a year of experience on you, which argues more for him than you.
Experience? So by your logic my four years of experience would invalidate anything a 2006 rookie has to say, right?
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004

Purchase Cree LED Bulbs from the Team 696 Online Store

Last edited by sanddrag : 10-18-2005 at 11:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-18-2005, 11:00 PM
Elgin Clock's Avatar
Elgin Clock Elgin Clock is offline
updates this status less than FB!
AKA: the one who "will break into your thoughts..."
FRC #0237 (Black Magic)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: H20-Town, Connecticut
Posts: 7,754
Elgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Elgin Clock
Re: Should teams be pushed to make higher quality robots?

Wow.. congratulations dude.. you know how to use the quote feature..

ANYWHO...

I think "teams should be pushed to make higher quality robots" in the name of safety, not in the name of vanity.

Deburr all metal parts, sand all wood parts, properly shield all moving parts from hands, watch the pinch points, use safe wiring methods.

I think that would in turn kick it up on the quality factor when making a robot, and also make the robot safer.

I think that is more important than "making a robot look pretty so some outsider can say.. ooooh.. perdy".

Who cares about them in those terms? Sure if ya build a pretty robot and you are at a competition you may catch the eye of a news crew and find some fame on the news, but that's not why we are inolved in this program are we?

I think a lifetime of learning properly and then teaching others and inspiring the youth is more important to myself at least than being on the news for a couple seconds during a voice over*...



*Don't ask.. bad experience. lol
__________________
The influence of many leads to the individuality of one. - E.C.C. (That's me!!)

Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-18-2005, 11:00 PM
Wayne C.'s Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Wayne C. Wayne C. is offline
hey- I think we did pretty good?
FRC #0025 (Raider Robotix)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: North Brunswick, N.J.
Posts: 1,530
Wayne C. has a reputation beyond reputeWayne C. has a reputation beyond reputeWayne C. has a reputation beyond reputeWayne C. has a reputation beyond reputeWayne C. has a reputation beyond reputeWayne C. has a reputation beyond reputeWayne C. has a reputation beyond reputeWayne C. has a reputation beyond reputeWayne C. has a reputation beyond reputeWayne C. has a reputation beyond reputeWayne C. has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Should teams be pushed to make higher quality robots?

Maybe the title of this should be
"should we push CD users to make higher quality posts....."


(from a guy with a LOT of experience)

WC

(PS- every team makes the best robot they can based on their abilities. It doesn't really matter about the robot. It is the team that they build that is the important accompliishment....)
__________________
you want that robot to do what?

Raider Robotix- www.raiderrobotix.org

Last edited by Wayne C. : 10-19-2005 at 09:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 AM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi