OCCRA
Go to Post FIRST already has 494 Martians, plus 70 more. - GaryVoshol [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Events   CD-Media   CD-Spy   FRC-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2009, 01:47 PM
Andrew Schreiber's Avatar
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Data Nerd
FRC #0125 (NUTRONS) (EWCP)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 3,190
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
pic: 397 Bumper Configuration

Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2009, 01:50 PM
Tottanka's Avatar
Tottanka Tottanka is offline
It isnt about bots,its about humans
AKA: Liron Gurvitz
FRC #3211 (The Y Team)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Hadera, Israel
Posts: 1,320
Tottanka has a reputation beyond reputeTottanka has a reputation beyond reputeTottanka has a reputation beyond reputeTottanka has a reputation beyond reputeTottanka has a reputation beyond reputeTottanka has a reputation beyond reputeTottanka has a reputation beyond reputeTottanka has a reputation beyond reputeTottanka has a reputation beyond reputeTottanka has a reputation beyond reputeTottanka has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 397 Bumper Configuration

it is as long as each segment of the bumper is at least 6'' long, at least that's what i think.
oh and you need an opening for the trailer hitch to feet in.
__________________
"We build people, not robots"
2013 & 2014 Israel Regional Chairman's Award - Team 3211 - The Y Team
2013 Judges Award
2014 Judges Award
Founder of teams 1947 and 2669
My FRC record: 9 Years, twice FTA, 4 Teams and counting. 78 wins, 44 losses, 5 ties as coach.

Last edited by Tottanka : 01-14-2009 at 01:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2009, 01:54 PM
Vikesrock's Avatar
Vikesrock Vikesrock is offline
Team 2175 Founder
AKA: Kevin O'Connor
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 3,305
Vikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Vikesrock Send a message via MSN to Vikesrock Send a message via Yahoo to Vikesrock
Re: pic: 397 Bumper Configuration

Ok, I'm not sure exactly where in the drawing you are planning on putting bumpers. Having said that I believe you could make a legal configuration out of this frame provided the two front flat surfaces are 6" long each.

Assuming the robot is 28X38 your bumper perimeter is 132" and yoiu need to cover 88" with bumpers.

It appears that there would be no reason not to cover both long sides with this design giving you 76". To properly cover the corners you would then need 2 6" segments on each of the short sides for a total of 24" which brings you well over the required 88".

If the angled pieces on the front are supposed to be bumpers these are not "official" bumpers and would count for robot weight and volume (and this cannot extend outside the bumper perimeter and would be illegal in the configuration shown. Removing these bumpers (and enough in the back to make a space for the trailer hitch would result in a legal configuration.
__________________


2007 Wisconsin Regional Highest Rookie Seed & Regional Finalists (Thanks 930 & 2039)
2008 MN Regional Semifinalists (Thanks 2472 & 1756)
2009 Northstar Regional Semifinalists (Thanks 171 & 525)
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2009, 01:55 PM
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is online now
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Posts: 4,423
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: pic: 397 Bumper Configuration

If the two angled front pieces are bumpers, this is illegal. Bumpers must be on the bumper perimeter, which is defined by wrapping a string around the robot.
__________________
Need help? Check out 973 Remote Assistance and Mentorship Program.

Like us on Facebook!

2014 Galileo Champions
2011 World Champions

Like our Robots? Check out the CAD files of MOST of our robots!
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2009, 01:58 PM
SuperJake's Avatar
SuperJake SuperJake is offline
No Problem!
AKA: Jake Classic
FRC #0061 (The Shifters)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Milford, MA
Posts: 277
SuperJake has much to be proud ofSuperJake has much to be proud ofSuperJake has much to be proud ofSuperJake has much to be proud ofSuperJake has much to be proud ofSuperJake has much to be proud ofSuperJake has much to be proud ofSuperJake has much to be proud ofSuperJake has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to SuperJake
Post Re: pic: 397 Bumper Configuration

It looks to me like you have a short bumper segment on the front end that curves into some sort of picker-upper device. According to my interpretation of <R08>, the bumper segments that angle into your picker-upper are not legal bumpers because they are not on the bumper perimeter. Additionally, the front segments look a little short - the plywood backing needs to be at least 6" long.

My team actually had a discussion about a similar area on our robot last night!

Hopefully this helps you out.
__________________
Never send a person to do a robot's job.
Robots excel at Dull, Dirty, and Dangerous jobs.


Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2009, 02:03 PM
HUNT397's Avatar
HUNT397 HUNT397 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Chris Hunt
FRC #0397 (Knight Riders)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Flint
Posts: 34
HUNT397 is a splendid one to beholdHUNT397 is a splendid one to beholdHUNT397 is a splendid one to beholdHUNT397 is a splendid one to beholdHUNT397 is a splendid one to beholdHUNT397 is a splendid one to beholdHUNT397 is a splendid one to behold
Re: pic: 397 Bumper Configuration

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vikesrock View Post
Ok, I'm not sure exactly where in the drawing you are planning on putting bumpers. Having said that I believe you could make a legal configuration out of this frame provided the two front flat surfaces are 6" long each.

Assuming the robot is 28X38 your bumper perimeter is 132" and yoiu need to cover 88" with bumpers.

It appears that there would be no reason not to cover both long sides with this design giving you 76". To properly cover the corners you would then need 2 6" segments on each of the short sides for a total of 24" which brings you well over the required 88".

If the angled pieces on the front are supposed to be bumpers these are not "official" bumpers and would count for robot weight and volume (and this cannot extend outside the bumper perimeter and would be illegal in the configuration shown. Removing these bumpers (and enough in the back to make a space for the trailer hitch would result in a legal configuration.
The angled sections are 6in long and we were going to put them there to satisify the corner bumper rule. and oops i did forget to add the hole for the trailer. So if we removed the small section would that be legal even though <R08> I. BUMPERS must protect all exterior corners of the BUMPER PERIMETER. is not satisified?
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2009, 02:06 PM
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 15,585
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Skype™ to EricH
Re: pic: 397 Bumper Configuration

Quote:
Originally Posted by HUNT397 View Post
The angled sections are 6in long and we were going to put them there to satisify the corner bumper rule. and oops i did forget to add the hole for the trailer. So if we removed the small section would that be legal even though <R08> I. BUMPERS must protect all exterior corners of the BUMPER PERIMETER. is not satisified?
If you removed the angled sections and the rest in that area was 6" long or more, you'd probably be fine.

The one thing I'm wondering is--are bumpers allowed inside the robot's BUMPER PERIMETER, if they aren't treated as BUMPERS?
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

Read the rules and make a picklist before thinking about winning a competition.

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2009, 02:13 PM
usbcd36's Avatar
usbcd36 usbcd36 is offline
Registered User
AKA: "DOS"
FRC #2399 (The Fighting Unicorns)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Solon, OH
Posts: 150
usbcd36 is a jewel in the roughusbcd36 is a jewel in the roughusbcd36 is a jewel in the rough
Re: pic: 397 Bumper Configuration

Ok, so…

I'm going to say no, since the segments of the front bumpers that lie on the two diagonals won't be considered BUMPERS, since they don't lie on the BUMPER PERIMETER. (<R08>L)

Also, ignoring the diagonal bumpers, the two segments on the front BUMPER PERIMETER look to be too short (min. 6") to qualify as BUMPERS. (<R08>A)

Keep in mind my response is not official in any way.
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2009, 02:16 PM
Andrew Schreiber's Avatar
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Data Nerd
FRC #0125 (NUTRONS) (EWCP)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 3,190
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 397 Bumper Configuration

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
If the two angled front pieces are bumpers, this is illegal. Bumpers must be on the bumper perimeter, which is defined by wrapping a string around the robot.
Yeah, I was wondering that myself. My only question is how does that work with polygons with 5 or more vertexes? Rather than try to illustrate with text I will give you points to plot, if I have a polygon with vertexes A= (0,0) B=(0,10) C=(10,10) D=(5,5) and E=(10,0) We know point D does not fall along the bumper perimeter. By your own argument the BP would be a polygon bounded by by ABCE. My primary question is that the rule states "BUMPERS must protect all exterior corners of the BUMPER PERIMETER (see Figure 8 - 2). " (From R08 I) The corner formed by BCE needs to be protected but obviously we cannot because there is no frame there. The logical thing would to run bumpers across angle BCD but as you said this is illegal because CD is not along the bumper perimeter.
__________________

Planning to top a 4 banner year...
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2009, 02:17 PM
Clinton Bolinger's Avatar
Clinton Bolinger Clinton Bolinger is offline
FF - PureMichigan
FRC #2337 (EngiNERDs)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 465
Clinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 397 Bumper Configuration

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
If you removed the angled sections and the rest in that area was 6" long or more, you'd probably be fine.

The one thing I'm wondering is--are bumpers allowed inside the robot's BUMPER PERIMETER, if they aren't treated as BUMPERS?

Bumpers not attached to the BP would have to be counted as part of the robot (including weight).


Quote:
<R08>
L. The BUMPERS must be fixed to the BUMPER PERIMETER.
-Oris-
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2009, 02:20 PM
Clinton Bolinger's Avatar
Clinton Bolinger Clinton Bolinger is offline
FF - PureMichigan
FRC #2337 (EngiNERDs)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 465
Clinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond reputeClinton Bolinger has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 397 Bumper Configuration

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
Yeah, I was wondering that myself. My only question is how does that work with polygons with 5 or more vertexes? Rather than try to illustrate with text I will give you points to plot, if I have a polygon with vertexes A= (0,0) B=(0,10) C=(10,10) D=(5,5) and E=(10,0) We know point D does not fall along the bumper perimeter. By your own argument the BP would be a polygon bounded by by ABCE. My primary question is that the rule states "BUMPERS must protect all exterior corners of the BUMPER PERIMETER (see Figure 8 - 2). " (From R08 I) The corner formed by BCE needs to be protected but obviously we cannot because there is no frame there. The logical thing would to run bumpers across angle BCD but as you said this is illegal because CD is not along the bumper perimeter.
The Bumpers must protect all the exterior corners of the BP not necessarily the corners of the robot frame.

-Oris-
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2009, 02:59 PM
MrForbes's Avatar
MrForbes MrForbes is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim
FRC #1726 (N.E.R.D.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sierra Vista AZ
Posts: 5,054
MrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 397 Bumper Configuration

From all the hours I've spent reading on this subject, I'll agree with Adam, it's not legal, you need to have 6" minimum bumpers on the front, not angled back. It's the combination of the Q&A response that you need BUMPERS on both sides of each corner of the BP, the rule that BUMPERS must attach at the BUMPER PERIMETER, and the minimum length of 6".

Wide robots are looking pretty good this year.
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2009, 04:09 PM
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,044
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 397 Bumper Configuration

Non-standard bumpers could be included on the angled faces leading to your collector if you desired. They would not have to meet any BUMPER standards, but would be counted in size and weight of the robot.

The short front sections of the robot must be protected with Standard BUMPERS. Part of the requirement of those is that the combined section of plywood, noodles and cloth must be at least 6" long, and not extend past the exterior corner of the robot. (Noodles and cloth alone can - in fact MUST - extend past the frame to protect the corner.) The entire length of the BUMPER must be supported by the main frame.
__________________
(since 2004)
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2009, 04:29 PM
Jared Russell's Avatar
Jared Russell Jared Russell is offline
I feel better now.
AKA: Jared341
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,631
Jared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 397 Bumper Configuration

I have deleted this post because of my (now) better judgement.

Last edited by Jared Russell : 01-15-2009 at 07:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-14-2009, 09:15 PM
Tom Line's Avatar
Tom Line Tom Line is offline
Raptors can't turn doorknobs.
FRC #1718 (The Fighting Pi)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Armada, Michigan
Posts: 2,136
Tom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 397 Bumper Configuration

It'd be pretty upsetting if the GDC reverses what they've already stated very clearly. All corners, both sides, 6 inches. It's intent has been pretty clear in the rules. That still leaves you 16 inches on a long robot to get a ball.

"Wrapping" the string so it touches just the outside edges of your robot and defining that as the bumper perimeter has been pretty well understood too (in my opinion).

If this suddenly changes to allow teams more leeway, other teams that have made serious design decisions that can't be changed would be rather disadvantaged.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
pic: Legal Bumper Configuration? AdamHeard Extra Discussion 31 01-15-2009 02:15 AM
pic: Team 397 2008 Robot 100% done!! HUNT397 Extra Discussion 9 02-14-2008 01:24 PM
Thanks 397 dan 322 Thanks and/or Congrats 1 03-12-2006 08:10 AM
pic: 397 Final product HUNT397 Robot Showcase 0 02-24-2006 05:57 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 PM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi