|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
After finding one for the 2010 season I decided to make a ranking for Rebound Rumble.
After finding a ranking by Samir Shaikh for Breakaway I decided to go through with the data from every regional/district event and rank each individual performance accordingly. Rankings are determined by your Qualification Score divided by the number of matches played at that event. Ties are sorted like the rules this year with Average Hybrid Points, then Bridge Points and finally Tele-op points to settle disputes.
Congrats to 469 for the highest ranking and to 67 for all four of the outings ranked in the top 15
The Second file is every teams combined average from every regional.
Congrats to the Top 8: 67 2481 987 469 829 3161 1114 and 1507
World Rankings.pdf
World Rankings Single.pdf
07-03-2012 04:57 PM
SkinkworksHow was this created? Would it be possible to get a csv or other computer-readable form of this? This is cool, it would be nice to be able to get more information from this.
07-03-2012 06:00 PM
stundt1
But Qs contains coopertition score. I would have to say that its not a valid way to rank teams ability.
Also, If you had a tough schedule it would affect your ranking dramatically. For example if you had 2-3 powerhouse teams on the opposite alliance against you.
Its hard to accurately rank all the frc team's...
Edit: But by firsts ranking system it looks accurate.
07-03-2012 06:36 PM
Ether
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=106177
07-03-2012 08:33 PM
MARS_JamesI made this is a ranking based on how you did at the competition not based on power so since FIRST ranked us with Coopertition so did I
I am making another with every teams combined efforts averaged so while I am doing that I will also make one eliminating CP so we are only ranked based on your QS minus CP then according to how you did in HP BP and TP
07-03-2012 09:08 PM
stundt1
I get what you mean its perfect if your going by the first ranking system.
07-03-2012 09:12 PM
JB987|
I made this is a ranking based on how you did at the competition not based on power so since FIRST ranked us with Coopertition so did I
I am making another with every teams combined efforts averaged so while I am doing that I will also make one eliminating CP so we are only ranked based on your QS minus CP then according to how you did in HP BP and TP |
07-03-2012 09:16 PM
gracie.
how do you put together a ranking sheet like this?
07-03-2012 09:47 PM
MARS_James
07-05-2012 12:30 PM
Bjenks548
Does this not include championship data? If so there's an error with 548, we got 34QS in 9 matches on Newton. (3.77 points per match)
07-05-2012 12:34 PM
MARS_JamesIt doesn't include Finals only regionals and district events (including district championships)
07-05-2012 10:22 PM
Tubatroopa
Wow...2738...we are one of the oldest teams and our rank is so low. I guess it's just inspiration to do better next year 
07-05-2012 11:48 PM
Ed Law
|
Wow...2738...we are one of the oldest teams and our rank is so low. I guess it's just inspiration to do better next year
![]() |
07-06-2012 06:47 AM
Ether| It is a ranking of how well teams played to the seeding system in each district/regional and normalized to the number of matches they played. |
| The title World Rankings in this post is a little misleading. |
07-07-2012 03:24 PM
MARS_JamesI added the combined rankings from every regional so every team is only listed once next I will be doing the QS without CP for everyone only being listed once
I may do a final one with rankings from nationals
07-11-2012 07:52 AM
CamrenAm I opening it in the wrong format? Can i open it in a spreadsheet so I can search for my team or do I have to look through thousands of numbers to find my team?
07-11-2012 08:00 AM
IndySam
|
Am I opening it in the wrong format? Can i open it in a spreadsheet so I can search for my team or do I have to look through thousands of numbers to find my team?
|
07-11-2012 11:15 AM
tr6scott<CTRL> and "F" at the same time... is your friend.
07-11-2012 08:38 PM
CamrenThanks guys. also if you would have included offseason events i think 3081 would be almost in the top 1000 seeing as we seeded 2nd and placed 2nd and scored alot more points then are 2 season events
07-12-2012 12:00 PM
sprocketman92So i'm confused my team is 3947 and i was wondering if somebody could tell me what these rankings mean for my team. Thanks
07-12-2012 12:39 PM
Ether|
So i'm confused my team is 3947 and i was wondering if somebody could tell me what these rankings mean for my team. Thanks
![]() |
07-12-2012 12:49 PM
IndySam
|
So i'm confused my team is 3947 and i was wondering if somebody could tell me what these rankings mean for my team. Thanks
![]() |