Log in

View Full Version : Fantasy FIRST

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
  1. [FF]: West Michigan Tier 1 (15 replies)
  2. [FF]: 2011 Oklahoma (15 replies)
  3. [FF]: Detroit Tier 2 (19 replies)
  4. [FF]: Detroit Tier 1 (15 replies)
  5. [FF]: 2011 St. Louis Teir 2 (8 replies)
  6. [FF]: 2011 St. Louis Tier 1 (13 replies)
  7. [FF]: 2011 Bayou (16 replies)
  8. [FF]: 2011 Kettering RERUN Tier 2 (9 replies)
  9. [FF]: 2011 Kettering RERUN Tier 1 (12 replies)
  10. [FF]: 2011 Traverse City RERUN Tier 2 (8 replies)
  11. [FF]: 2011 Traverse City RERUN Tier 1 (5 replies)
  12. [FF]: 2011 Peachtree (26 replies)
  13. [FF]: [FF]: 2011 Boilermaker Tier 2 (15 replies)
  14. [FF]: 2011 Boilermaker Tier 1 (23 replies)
  15. [FF]: 2011 Chesapeake (38 replies)
  16. [FF]: 2011 Sacramento Teir 2 (22 replies)
  17. [FF]: 2011 Sacramento Tier 1 (15 replies)
  18. [FF]: 2011 Arizona (32 replies)
  19. [FF]: 2011 Isreal (32 replies)
  20. [FF]: 2011 NYC Regional (30 replies)
  21. [FF]: 2011 Pittsburgh Tier 2 (22 replies)
  22. [FF]: 2011 Pittsburgh Tier 1 (9 replies)
  23. [FF]: 2011 Wisconsin (46 replies)
  24. [FF]: 2011 Florida (24 replies)
  25. [FF]: Lake Superior Tier 2 (22 replies)
  26. [FF]: Lake Superior Tier 1 (20 replies)
  27. [FF]: 2011 WPI Teir 2 (13 replies)
  28. [FF]: 2011 WPI Tier 1 (18 replies)
  29. [FF]: 2011 Greater Kansas City (29 replies)
  30. [FF]: 2011 San Deigo (48 replies)
  31. [FF]: 2011 Alamo Teir 2 (21 replies)
  32. [FF]: 2011 Alamo Tier 1 (32 replies)
  33. [FF]: 2011 New Jersey Regional (34 replies)
  34. [FF]: 2011 Kettering District Tier 2 (6 replies)
  35. [FF]: 2011 Kettering District Tier 1 (16 replies)
  36. [FF]: [FF]: [FF]: 2011 FLR Tier 2 (20 replies)
  37. [FF]: 2011 FLR Tier 1 (28 replies)
  38. [FF]: [FF]: [FF]: 2011 Traverse City Tier 2 (23 replies)
  39. [FF]: 2011 Traverse City Tier 1 (15 replies)
  40. [FF]: 2011 BAE Regional Teir 2 (41 replies)
  41. [FF]: 2011 BAE Regional Teir 1 (24 replies)
  42. [FF]: [FF]: Kettering Kickoff 2010 (91 replies)
  43. [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion (251 replies)
  44. [FF]: 2011 Seaon Long Fantasy FIRST (468 replies)
  45. [FF]: FF Draft Assistant Rewrite (34 replies)
  46. [FF]: 2010 IRI (144 replies)
  47. [FF]: 2010 MARC (47 replies)
  48. [FF]: 2010 Beantown Blitz (49 replies)
  49. [FF]: 2010 Battlecry (49 replies)
  50. [FF]: Newton draft (61 replies)
  51. [FF]: Galileo Division Draft (84 replies)
  52. [FF]: 2010 Curie Division Draft (70 replies)
  53. [FF]: 2010 Archimedes Division Draft (69 replies)
  54. [FF]: [FF]: MI State Championship Tier 2 (31 replies)
  55. [FF]: MI State Championship Tier 1 (29 replies)
  56. [FF]: 2010 Palmetto League 2 (22 replies)
  57. [FF]: 2010 Palmetto League 1 (27 replies)
  58. [FF]: Las Vegas League 2 (43 replies)
  59. [FF]: 2010 Las Vegas League 1 (16 replies)
  60. [FF]: 2010 North Carolina League 2 (23 replies)
  61. [FF]: 2010 North Carolina League 1 (14 replies)
  62. [FF]: 2010 Seattle League 2 (18 replies)
  63. [FF]: Seattle League 1 (25 replies)
  64. [FF]: 2010 Oklahoma League 2 (15 replies)
  65. [FF]: 2010 Oklahoma League 1 (27 replies)
  66. [FF]: 2010 1000 Lakes League 2 (21 replies)
  67. [FF]: 2010 1000 Lakes League 1 (22 replies)
  68. [FF]: 2010 North Star League 2 (34 replies)
  69. [FF]: 2010 North Star League 1 (26 replies)
  70. [FF]: 2010 Buckeye League 2 (30 replies)
  71. [FF]: 2010 Buckeye League 1 (28 replies)
  72. [FF]: 2010 Sacramento Tier 2 (35 replies)
  73. [FF]: 2010 Sacramento Tier 1 (16 replies)
  74. [FF]: 2010 Long Island League 2 (16 replies)
  75. [FF]: 2010 Long Island League 1 (22 replies)
  76. [FF]: 2010 Toronto Tier 2 (18 replies)
  77. [FF]: 2010 Toronto Tier 1 (24 replies)
  78. [FF]: 2010 Lone Star Tier 2 (23 replies)
  79. [FF]: 2010 Lone Star Tier 1 (38 replies)
  80. [FF]: 2010 Boston League 2 (22 replies)
  81. [FF]: 2010 Boston League 1 (19 replies)
  82. [FF]: 2010 Hawaii League 3 (17 replies)
  83. [FF]: 2010 Hawaii League 2 (11 replies)
  84. [FF]: 2010 Hawaii League 1 (8 replies)
  85. [FF]: 2010 Colorado League 2 (19 replies)
  86. [FF]: 2010 Colorado League 1 (15 replies)
  87. [FF]: 2010 LA League 2 (22 replies)
  88. [FF]: 2010 LA League 1 (23 replies)
  89. [FF]: 2010 Troy District League 3 (25 replies)
  90. [FF]: 2010 Troy District League 2 (14 replies)
  91. [FF]: 2010 Troy District League 1 (43 replies)
  92. [FF]: 2010 Waterloo League 3 (6 replies)
  93. [FF]: 2010 Waterloo League 2 (22 replies)
  94. [FF]: 2010 Waterloo League 1 (20 replies)
  95. [FF]: 2010 Philadelphia League 2 (15 replies)
  96. [FF]: 2010 Philadelphia League 1 (30 replies)
  97. [FF]: 2010 Utah League 3 (14 replies)
  98. [FF]: 2010 Utah League 2 (9 replies)
  99. [FF]: 2010 Utah League 1 (13 replies)
  100. [FF]: 2010 VCU Regional Tier 2 (21 replies)
  101. [FF]: 2010 VCU Regional Tier 1 (22 replies)
  102. [FF]: 2010 Dallas League 2 (20 replies)
  103. [FF]: 2010 Dallas League 1 (26 replies)
  104. [FF]: 2010 St. Louis League 3 (15 replies)
  105. [FF]: [FF]: [FF]: 2010 St. Louis League 2 (5 replies)
  106. [FF]: 2010 St. Louis League 1 (23 replies)
  107. [FF]: 2010 Boilermaker League 2 (27 replies)
  108. [FF]: 2010 Boilermaker League 1 (17 replies)
  109. [FF]: West Michigan Tier 3 (11 replies)
  110. [FF]: West Michigan Tier 2 (20 replies)
  111. [FF]: West Michigan Tier 1 (27 replies)
  112. [FF]: 2010 Detroit League 3 (9 replies)
  113. [FF]: 2010 Detroit League 2 (16 replies)
  114. [FF]: 2010 Detroit League 1 (20 replies)
  115. [FF]: [FF]: [FF]: 2010 Midwest Tier 2 (26 replies)
  116. [FF]: 2010 Midwest Tier 1 (44 replies)
  117. [FF]: 2010 Connecticut League 2 (26 replies)
  118. [FF]: 2010 Connecticut League 1 (29 replies)
  119. [FF]: 2010 SVR League 2 (16 replies)
  120. [FF]: 2010 SVR League 1 (19 replies)
  121. [FF]: 2010 Israel League 2 (17 replies)
  122. [FF]: 2010 Israel League 1 (27 replies)
  123. [FF]: 2010 NYC League 2 (23 replies)
  124. [FF]: 2010 NYC League 1 (36 replies)
  125. [FF]: 2010 Wisconsin League 2 (27 replies)
  126. [FF]: 2010 Wisconsin League 1 (34 replies)
  127. [FF]: [FF]: 2010 Ann Arbor Tier 3 (6 replies)
  128. [FF]: 2010 Ann Arbor Tier 2 (19 replies)
  129. [FF]: 2010 Ann Arbor Tier 1 (16 replies)
  130. [FF]: 2010 Pittsburgh League 3 (11 replies)
  131. [FF]: 2010 Pittsburgh League 2 (11 replies)
  132. [FF]: 2010 Pittsburgh League 1 (9 replies)
  133. [FF]: 2010 Florida League 2 (33 replies)
  134. [FF]: 2010 Florida League 1 (23 replies)
  135. [FF]: 2010 Cass Tech Tier 2 (21 replies)
  136. [FF]: 2010 Cass Tech Tier 1 (15 replies)
  137. [FF]: 2010 Chesepeake League 2 (25 replies)
  138. [FF]: 2010 Chesepeake League 1 (26 replies)
  139. [FF]: [FF]: 2010 WPI League 3 (19 replies)
  140. [FF]: [FF]: 2010 WPI League 2 (16 replies)
  141. [FF]: 2010 WPI League 1 (20 replies)
  142. [FF]: 2010 Arizona League 2 (25 replies)
  143. [FF]: 2010 Arizona League 1 (28 replies)
  144. [FF]: 2010 Oregon Tier 2 (28 replies)
  145. [FF]: 2010 Oregon Tier 1 (15 replies)
  146. [FF]: [FF]: 2010 BAE League 2 (36 replies)
  147. [FF]: 2010 BAE League 1 (23 replies)
  148. [FF]: 2010 Greater Kansas City League 2 (57 replies)
  149. [FF]: 2010 Greater Kansas City League 1 (36 replies)
  150. [FF]: 2010 Kettering Tier 3 (19 replies)
  151. [FF]: 2010 Kettering Tier 2 (18 replies)
  152. [FF]: 2010 Kettering Tier 1 (33 replies)
  153. [FF]: 2010 New Jersey League 2 (32 replies)
  154. [FF]: 2010 New Jersey League 1 (43 replies)
  155. [FF]: 2010 Traverse City Tier 3 (23 replies)
  156. [FF]: 2010 Traverse City Tier 2 (21 replies)
  157. [FF]: 2010 Traverse City Tier 1 (29 replies)
  158. [FF]: 2010 FLR League 3 (21 replies)
  159. [FF]: 2010 FLR League 2 (28 replies)
  160. [FF]: 2010 FLR League 1 (24 replies)
  161. [FF]: 2010 Bayou League 3 (20 replies)
  162. [FF]: 2010 Bayou League 2 (28 replies)
  163. [FF]: 2010 Bayou League 1 (23 replies)
  164. [FF]: Peachtree League 2 (43 replies)
  165. [FF]: Peachtree League 1 (50 replies)
  166. [FF]: Washington, DC Tier 2 (29 replies)
  167. [FF]: Washington, DC Tier 1 (49 replies)
  168. [FF]: San Deigo League 3 (28 replies)
  169. [FF]: San Deigo League 2 (24 replies)
  170. [FF]: San Deigo League 1 (30 replies)
  171. [FF]: Season Long Auction League (8 replies)
  172. first fantasy (3 replies)
  173. [FF]: 2010 Season Long Fantasy FIRST (489 replies)
  174. [FF]: IRI Auction League (71 replies)
  175. [FF]: Monty Madness (75 replies)
  176. [FF]: Battlecry (88 replies)
  177. [FF]: Championship Brackets Tournement (5 replies)
  178. [FF]: 2009 Championships Free- For-All (55 replies)
  179. [FF]: 2009 Championships (199 replies)
  180. [FF]: MI State Championship Tier 2 (26 replies)
  181. [FF]: MI State Championship Tier 1 (56 replies)
  182. [FF]: 2009 Minnesota North Star Regional Tier 2 League (27 replies)
  183. [FF]: 2009 Minnesota North Star Regional Tier 1 League (18 replies)
  184. [FF]: [FF]: 2009 Minnesota 1000 Lakes Regional Tier 2 League (23 replies)
  185. [FF]: 2009 Minnesota 1000 Lakes Regional Tier 1 League (16 replies)
  186. [FF]: 2009 Sacremento Regional Teir 2 League (19 replies)
  187. [FF]: 2009 Sacremento Regional Teir 1 League (16 replies)
  188. [FF]: SBPLI Long Island Regional Tier 3 (18 replies)
  189. [FF]: SBPLI Long Island Regional Tier 2 (14 replies)
  190. [FF]: SBPLI Long Island Regional Tier 1 (16 replies)
  191. [FF]: 2009 Palmetto Regional Tier 3 League (16 replies)
  192. [FF]: 2009 Palmetto Regional Tier 2 League (23 replies)
  193. [FF]: 2009 Palmetto Regional Tier 1 League (31 replies)
  194. [FF]: 2009 Lonestar Regional Tier 2 League (25 replies)
  195. [FF]: 2009 Lonestar Regional Teir 1 League (21 replies)
  196. [FF]: [FF]: 2009 Troy FIRST Robotics District Competition Tier 3 League (15 replies)
  197. [FF]: [FF]: [FF]: 2009 Troy FIRST Robotics District Competition Tier 2 League (18 replies)
  198. [FF]: 2009 Troy FIRST Robotics District Competition Tier 1 League (46 replies)
  199. [FF]: Microsoft Seattle Regional Tier 2 (21 replies)
  200. [FF]: Microsoft Seattle Regional Tier 1 (19 replies)
  201. [FF]: 2009 West Michigan FIRST Robotics District Competition Tier 3 League (11 replies)
  202. [FF]: 2009 West Michigan FIRST Robotics District Competition Tier 2 League (16 replies)
  203. [FF]: 2009 West Michigan FIRST Robotics District Competition Tier 1 League (18 replies)
  204. [FF]: [FF]: 2009 Las Vegas Teir 2 Leauge (28 replies)
  205. [FF]: 2009 Las Vegas Tier 1 League (22 replies)
  206. [FF]: [FF]: [FF]: 2009 Hawaii Reagional Tier 1 League (21 replies)
  207. [FF]: 2009 Hawaii Regiona Tier 3 League (15 replies)
  208. [FF]: 2009 Hawaii Regiona Tier 2 League (25 replies)
  209. [FF]: [FF]: GTR Tier 2 (28 replies)
  210. [FF]: [FF]: GTR Tier 1 (32 replies)
  211. [FF]: [FF]: 2009 Conneticut Regional Tier 2 League (26 replies)
  212. [FF]: 2009 Conneticut Regional Tier 1 Leage (27 replies)
  213. [FF]: 2009 Colorado Regional Tier 2 League (15 replies)
  214. [FF]: 2009 Colorado Regional Tier 1 League (30 replies)
  215. [FF]: [FF]: [FF]: 2009 Waterloo Regional Tier 1 League (21 replies)
  216. [FF]: [FF]: 2009 Waterloo Tier 4 League (14 replies)
  217. [FF]: [FF]: 2009 Waterloo Tier 3 League (18 replies)
  218. [FF]: 2009 Waterloo Tier 2 League (18 replies)
  219. [FF]: 2009 Philadelphia Regional Tier 2 League (24 replies)
  220. [FF]: 2009 Philadelphia Regional Tier 1 League (27 replies)
  221. [FF]: St. Louis Tier 3 (7 replies)
  222. [FF]: St. Louis Tier 2 (15 replies)
  223. [FF]: St. Louis Tier 1 (7 replies)
  224. [FF]: Detroit Tier 3 (10 replies)
  225. [FF]: Detroit Tier 2 (16 replies)
  226. [FF]: Detroit Tier 1 (15 replies)
  227. [FF]: 2009 VCU Regional Tier 2 League (26 replies)
  228. [FF]: 2009 VCU Regional Tier 1 League (26 replies)
  229. [FF]: Lansing Tier 3 (13 replies)
  230. [FF]: Lansing Tier 2 (10 replies)
  231. [FF]: 2009 Chesapeake Regional Tier 2 League (17 replies)
  232. [FF]: Lansing Tier 1 (11 replies)
  233. [FF]: 2009 Chesapeake Regional Tier 1 League (37 replies)
  234. [FF]: Boilermaker Tier 3 (8 replies)
  235. [FF]: Boilermaker Tier 2 (20 replies)
  236. [FF]: Boilermaker Tier 1 (12 replies)
  237. [FF]: 2009 Bayou Regional Tier 3 League (21 replies)
  238. [FF]: 2009 Bayou Regional Tier 2 League (5 replies)
  239. [FF]: 2009 Bayou Tier 1 League (9 replies)
  240. [FF]: 2009 Arizona Regional Tier 2 League (19 replies)
  241. [FF]: 2009 Arizona Regional Tier 1 League (20 replies)
  242. [FF]: Cass Tech Tier 3 (9 replies)
  243. [FF]: Cass Tech Tier 2 (13 replies)
  244. [FF]: Cass Tech Tier 1 (15 replies)
  245. [FF]: [FF]: 2009 Wisconsin Regional Tier 2 League (19 replies)
  246. [FF]: 2009 Wisconsin Regional Teir 1 League (31 replies)
  247. [FF]: 2009 Israel Regional Tier 2 League (38 replies)
  248. [FF]: 2009 Silicon Valley Tier 2 (21 replies)
  249. [FF]: 2009 Silicon Valley Tier 1 (17 replies)
  250. [FF]: 2009 Israel Regional Tier 1 League (40 replies)