Revised Championship Predictions

[Jay O'Donnell]

For everyone else sitting at home, I think it'll be fun to make predictions again now that we know our elimination alliances. State who will beat who in each round and then do Einstein. Have Fun!

Archimedes:
1 beats 8
2 beats 7
3 beats 6
5 beats 4

1 beats 5
2 beats 3

2 beats 1

Archimedes Champs: 33, 469, 1519

Curie:
1 beats 8
2 beats 7
6 beats 3
4 beats 5

4 beats 1
2 beats 6

4 beats 2

Curie Champs: 2056, 967, 3990

Galileo:

1 beats 8
2 beats 7
3 beats 6
5 beats 4

1 beats 5
2 beats 3

1 beats 2

Galileo Champs: 118, 1114, 4039
Newton:
1 beats 8
2 beats 7
3 beats 6
5 beats 4

5 beats 1
3 beats 2

5 beats 3

Newton Champs: 341, 68, 2826

Einstein:
Archimedes beats Curie
Galileo beats Newton

Archimedes beats Galileo

Champions: 33, 469, 1519

[Andrew Lawrence]

I mostly agree with all of your predictions, but I think alliance 1 will take it all on Newton.

[Jay O'Donnell]

I mostly agree with all of your predictions, but I think alliance 1 will take it all on Newton.

That was my toughest call, considering how good 1538 and 1986 are, but something was telling me to go with that 5th seeded alliance.

[Steven Donow]

Archimedes:

1 beats 8
2 beats 7
3 beats 6
4 beats 5

1 beats 4
2 beats 3

2 beats 1

Archimedes Champs: 33, 469, 1519

Curie:
1 beats 8
7 beats 2 (gotta throw something bold in there :P)
6 beats 3
4 beats 5

4 beats 1
7 beats 6

4 beats 7

Curie Champs: 2056, 967, 3990

Galileo:
1 beats 8
2 beats 7
3 beats 6
5 beats 4

1 beats 5
2 beats 3

1 beats 2

Galileo Champs: 118, 1114, 4039

Newton:
1 beats 8
2 beats 7
3 beats 6
5 beats 4

1 beats 5
3 beats 2

1 beats 3

Newton Champions: 1538, 1986, 217

Archimedes beats Curie
Newton beats Galileo

Newton beats Archimedes

World Champions: 1538, 1986, 217

[Alex Cormier]

Archimedes:
1. 2415 987 2959
2. 33 469 1519
3. 2468 254 11
4. 868 2590 71
5. 126 3310 1756(?)
6. 948 20 973
7. 3467 379 365
8. 4450 1334 1660(not sure)

1>8
2>7
3>6
4>5

1>4
2>3

2>1

Curie:
1. 1678 148 862
2. 1983 3539 2996
3. 4814 67 1918
4. 2056 967 3990
5. 1310 3824 1684
6. 1717 234 135
7. 359 233 16
8. 4565 103 2168

1>8
2>7
3>6
4>5

4>1
2>3

4>2

Galileo:
1. 118 1114 4039
2. 2169 3284 2175
3. 1425 2474 2337
4. 2630 111 3641
5. 1241 1477 610
6. 3656 1806 4334
7. 2338 2512 1323
8. 245 1732 27

1>8
2>7
6>3
5>4

1>6
5>2

1>5

Newton:
1. 1538 1986 217
2. 128 195 1676
3. 303 3476 1640
4. 3997 829 1741
5. 341 68 2826
6. 2252 1718 141
7. 2052 2054 225
8. 1569 175 190

1>8
2>7
3>6
5>4

1>5
2>3

1>2

Einstein:
Archimedes beats Curie
Galileo beats Newton

Galileo beats Archimedes

Champions: 118, 1114, 4039

[bam-bam]

Reposted from another thread. (Was not aware of this one at time of posting).

Archimedes

1. 2415 987 2959
2. 33 469 1519 (SF)
3. 2468 254 11 (F)
4. 868 2590 71 (SF)
5. 126 3310 1756 (QF)
6. 948 20 973 (QF)
7. 3467 379 365 (QF)
8. 4450 1334 1660 (QF)


1 over 8
2 over 7
3 over 6, 3 matches
4 over 5, 3 matches

1 over 4
3 over 2, 3 matches (Yes... 2468-254-11 over 33-469-1519)

1 over 3, barely (1 wins it on autonomous)

Curie

1. 1678 148 862 (F)
2. 1983 3539 2996 (QF)
3. 4814 67 1918
4. 2056 967 3990 (QF)
5. 1310 3824 1684 (QF)
6. 1717 234 135 (QF)
7. 359 233 16 (SF)
8. 4565 103 2168 (QF)

1 over 8, 3 matches (I wouldn't be surprised if it went the other way)
7 over 2, 3 matches
3 over 6
4 over 5, 3 matches

1 over 4, 3 matches
3 over 7, 3 matches

3 over 1

Galileo

1. 118 1114 4039
2. 2169 3284 2175 (F)
3. 1425 2474 2337 (QF)
4. 2630 111 3641 (QF)
5. 1241 1477 610 (QF)
6. 3656 1806 4334 (SF)
7. 2338 2512 1323 (QF)
8. 245 1732 27 (QF) (If they weren't #8, they could've been finalists)


1 over 8
2 over 7
6 over 3, 3 matches
5 over 4

1 over 5
2 over 6, 3 matches (I am rooting for #6, though)

1 over 2

Newton

1. 1538 1986 217
2. 128 195 1676 (QF)
3. 303 3476 1640 (SF or F)
4. 3997 829 1741 (QF)
5. 341 68 2826 (SF)
6. 2252 1718 141 (QF)
7. 2052 2054 225 (SF or F)
8. 1569 175 190 (QF)

1 over 8
7 over 2, 3 matches (VERY close matches)
3 over 6
5 over 4

1 over 5
3 vs. 7... honestly it's so even, I can' tell at all.

1 over 3/7

Archimedes: 2415-987-2959
Curie: 4814-67-1918
Galileo: 118-114-4039
Newton: 1538-1986-217

Curie over Arch, 3 matches
Galileo vs. Newton (No idea who will win at all)

Galileo/Newton over Curie

I'm calling either 118-1114-4039 or 1538-1986-217 to win.

[Joe Ross]

Archimedes

1 beats 8
2 beats 7
3 beats 6
4 beats 5

1 beats 4
3 beats 2

3 beats 1

Archimedes Champs 2468 254 11

Curie
1 beats 8
2 beats 7
6 beats 3
5 beats 4

5 beats 1
2 beats 6

5 beats 1

Curie Champs 1310 3824 1684


Galileo

1 beats 8
7 beats 2
3 beats 6
5 beats 4

1 beats 5
3 beats 7

1 beats 3

Galileo Champs 118 1114 4039


Newton

1 beats 8
2 beats 7
3 beats 6
5 beats 4

1 beats 5
2 beats 3

1 beats 2

Newton Champs 1538 1986 217

Einstein:

Archimedes beats Curie
Galileo beats Newton

Galileo beats Archimedes

World Champion 118 1114 4039

[Tetraman]

Archimedes:
1. 2415 987 2959 over 8. 4450 1334 1660
5. 126 3310 1756 over 4. 868 2590 71
2. 33 469 1519 over 7. 3467 379 365
3. 2468 254 11 over 6. 948 20 973

1. 2415 987 2959 over 5. 126 3310 1756
2. 33 469 1519 over 3. 2468 254 11

2. 33 469 1519 over 1. 2415 987 2959


Curie:
1. 1678 148 862 over 8. 4565 103 2168
4. 2056 967 3990 over 5. 1310 3824 1684
7. 359 233 16 over 2. 1983 3539 2996
3. 4814 67 1918 over 6. 1717 234 135

4. 2056 967 3990 over 1. 1678 148 862
3. 4814 67 1918 over 7. 359 233 16

3. 4814 67 1918 over 4. 2056 967 3990


Galileo:
1. 118 1114 4039 over 8. 245 1732 27
5. 1241 1477 610 over 4. 2630 111 3641
2. 2169 3284 2175 over 7. 2338 2512 1323
3. 1425 2474 2337 over 6. 3656 1806 4334

1. 118 1114 4039 over 5. 1241 1477 610
3. 1425 2474 2337 over 2. 2169 3284 2175

1. 118 1114 4039 over 3. 1425 2474 2337


Newton:
1. 1538 1986 217 over 8. 1569 175 190
5. 341 68 2826 over 4. 3997 829 1741
6. 2252 1718 141 over 3. 303 3476 1640
7. 2052 2054 225 over 2. 128 195 1676

5. 341 68 2826 over 1. 1538 1986 217
6. 2252 1718 141 over 7. 2052 2054 225

5. 341 68 2826 over 6. 2252 1718 141


Einstein:
Arch 33 469 1519 over Curie 4814 67 1918
Galileo 118 1114 4039 over Newton 341 68 2826

Galileo 118 1114 4039 over Arch 33 469 1519

[Lil' Lavery]

Was trying to set up a Bracketmaker challenge, but apparently my login no longer works. :confused:


My bracket in pretty/detailed format! (http://betterbracketmaker.com/#!/8e1dbb330c715)

My bracket in semi-pretty, non detailed format!

Archimedes:

1 beats 8
1 beats 4
4 beats 5
1 beats 2
3 beats 6
2 beats 3
2 beats 7


Curie:

1 beats 8
4 beats 1
4 beats 5
4 beats 3
3 beats 6
3 beats 7
7 beats 2


Galileo:

1 beats 8
1 beats 5
5 beats 4
1 beats 3
3 beats 6
3 beats 2
2 beats 7


Newton:

1 beats 8
1 beats 4
5 beats 4
1 beats 7
3 beats 6
7 beats 3
7 beats 2


Einstein:

A1 beats C4
Galileo #1 beats Archimedes #1
G1 beats N1

[mjustice66]

Here are mine (http://betterbracketmaker.com/#!/09dec56cfb715)

[robotFish]

Archimedes:
1 beats 8
2 beats 7
3 beats 6
4 beats 5

1 beats 4
2 beats 3

2 beats 1

Archimedes Champs: 33, 469, 1519

Curie:
1 beats 8
7 beats 2
6 beats 3
4 beats 5

4 beats 1
7 beats 6

7 beats 4

Curie Champs: 359,233,16

Galileo:
1 beats 8
2 beats 7
3 beats 6
4 beats 5

1 beats 4
2 beats 3

1 beats 2

Galileo Champs: 118, 1114, 4039

Newton:
1 beats 8
2 beats 7
3 beats 6
4 beats 5

5 beats 1
3 beats 2

5 beats 3

Newton Champs: 341, 68, 2826

Einstein:
Archimedes beats Curie
Newton beats Galileo

Archimedes beats Newton

Champions: 33, 469, 1519

[Racer26]

Archimedes:

1 over 8
4 over 5 5 over 4
2 over 7
3 over 6

1 over 5
2 over 3

2 over 1

Archimedes Champions: 33, 469, 1519

Curie:

8 over 1 1 over 8
4 over 5
7 over 2 2 over 7.
3 over 6

4 over 1 1 over 4 (TFOUL win? Come ON!)
3 over 2

3 over 1 1 over 3

Curie Champions: 4814, 67, 1918 1678, 148, 862

Galileo:

1 over 8
5 over 4
2 over 7
3 over 6

1 over 5 (this was an awesome set) 5 over 1
2 over 3

5 over 2

Galileo Champions: 1241, 610, 1477

Newton:

1 over 8
5 over 4 4 over 5
2 over 7
3 over 6

1 over 4
2 over 3 3 over 2

1 over 3 3 over 1

Newton Champions: 1538, 1986, 217 303, 3476, 1640

Einstein:

A over C
G over N

G over A

2013 World Champions: 1241, 610, 1477

[Basel A]

Predicted with flippy147852

Archimedes

1. 2415 987 2959 (F)
2. 33 469 1519 (W)
3. 2468 254 11 (SF)
4. 868 2590 71 (SF)
5. 126 3310 1756 (QF)
6. 948 20 973 (QF)
7. 3467 379 365 (QF)
8. 4450 1334 1660 (QF)


1 over 8
2 over 7
3 over 6
4 over 5

1 over 4
2 over 3, 3 matches

2 over 1, 3 matches

Curie

1. 1678 148 862 (SF)
2. 1983 3539 2996 (W)
3. 4814 67 1918 (SF)
4. 2056 967 3990 (F)
5. 1310 3824 1684 (QF)
6. 1717 234 135 (QF)
7. 359 233 16 (QF)
8. 4565 103 2168 (QF)

1 over 8
2 over 7, 3 matches
3 over 6, 3 matches
4 over 5

4 over 1, 3 matches
2 over 3

2 over 4

Galileo

1. 118 1114 4039 (W)
2. 2169 3284 2175 (SF)
3. 1425 2474 2337 (F)
4. 2630 111 3641 (QF)
5. 1241 1477 610 (SF)
6. 3656 1806 4334 (QF)
7. 2338 2512 1323 (QF)
8. 245 1732 27 (QF)


1 over 8
2 over 7
3 over 6
5 over 4

1 over 5, 3 matches
3 over 2, 3 matches

1 over 3

Newton

1. 1538 1986 217 (W)
2. 128 195 1676 (QF)
3. 303 3476 1640 (SF or F)
4. 3997 829 1741 (QF)
5. 341 68 2826 (SF)
6. 2252 1718 141 (QF)
7. 2052 2054 225 (F)
8. 1569 175 190 (QF)

1 over 8
7 over 2
3 over 6
5 over 4

1 over 5
7 over 3

1 over 7

Archimedes: 33 469 1519
Curie: 1983 3539 2996
Galileo: 118 1114 4039
Newton: 1538 1986 217

Archimedes beats Curie
Newton beats Galileo

Archimedes beats Newton in 3 matches

[A. Estrella 78]

Right so far with Archimedes. Not so sure about 2 beating 1 though in the finals.

[A. Estrella 78]

I stand corrected. 1519, 33, 469 beat the #1 seed in Archimedes.:rolleyes: Haha.

[saikiranra]

Looking at things right now, I think Newton will defeat Archimedes in the finals. Go Code Orange!

[saikiranra]

I take back my words. It looks like the Galileo alliance has advanced, not Newton.

[EricH]

I take back my words. It looks like the Galileo alliance has advanced, not Newton.

Scoring error in semis put Galileo and Newton in a 1-1 tie instead of a 2-0 Newton win. Galileo then made it 2-1 by putting on an automode clinic and scoring discs fast and furious.

So, now for the question:

Archimedes? Or Galileo?

[IndySam]

Glad to see none of you experts picked us (Newton 4) to beat the #5 alliance.
We were pretty sure we could beat #5 and we did.

Also I was sure that #3 was the best alliance on Newton and was surprised that nobody picked them.

I guess it was hard to predict by not being there watching this division in person.

[Jaxom]

Glad to see none of you experts picked us (Newton 4) to beat the #5 alliance.
We were pretty sure we could beat #5 and we did.
I can't prove it since I didn't post yesterday (was a bit too busy to be looking at CD; go figure :)) but I was pretty sure you were going to win as well. Not sure I'm an expert, though.

Also I was sure that #3 was the best alliance on Newton and was surprised that nobody picked them.
I didn't think at the time that they were the best alliance, but I do know I was really hoping we didn't have to play them. I guess I was right. :ahh: They were a great alliance and they deserved the win. I'm just sorry that things didn't work out to make Newton the Einstein winners. We've never been in the division that won champs; I guess if it can't be you you'd like it to be the team that beat you. ;)

[PayneTrain]

Well...

Galileo v. Archimedes will go to a third match.

That's all I got.

Mine turned out ok.

I'd like to thank the academy.

[OZ_341]

Glad to see none of you experts picked us (Newton 4) to beat the #5 alliance.
We were pretty sure we could beat #5 and we did.

Also I was sure that #3 was the best alliance on Newton and was surprised that nobody picked them.

I guess it was hard to predict by not being there watching this division in person.
This is first time I am seeing these predictions.
While we did feel good about the alliance we had formed from the #5 position, we certainly had a ton of respect for the #4 alliance and the Digital Goats. Nice work on Newton.

[IndySam]

This is first time I am seeing these predictions.
While we did feel good about the alliance we had formed from the #5 position, we certainly had a ton of respect for the #4 alliance and the Digital Goats. Nice work on Newton.

Thanks, you guys were great. I was just funnin' the guys in this thread. I didn't think we would win either.