F Elliott
19-01-2014, 20:01
We wish to mount two DC motors per side that are mechanically linked, for a total of four drive motors. Lets assume we have plenty of motors and controllers to build it anyway we wish. Two options:
A. Use one motor controller with two motors per channel with the motors on each side wired in parallel and connected to one channel (L, R) being careful of shorts.
B. Use two motor controllers and connect one motor per channel with each motor being programmed on a separate channel (LF, LR, RF, RR)
QUESTIONS
1. Which approach would give us better drive power? Better reliability?
2. Given that the motors on each side are mechanically linked, is it necessary to use Option A or is it just a programming convenience or saves a motor controller?
3. Under Option A, wiring two motors in parallel to one channel should draw twice the current in that channel. Are the controllers able to reliably supply that?
4. Under Option B, if the two motors are always programmed as a sequential two-line operation, will that work or will the motors potentially "fight" one another?
5. Under option B, what if we wired the two front motors to one controller and the two rear motors to the second controller? That way, if one controller died, perhaps we'd still be able to drive?
In short, how would you wire and program the motors and why?
THANKS!
Photo of one side of the prototype drive. The shoulder bolts will be replaced with shorter bolts to eliminate the aluminum spacers outside the wheels.
http://friedbits.com/downloads/DriveTrain-20141118-5.jpg
A. Use one motor controller with two motors per channel with the motors on each side wired in parallel and connected to one channel (L, R) being careful of shorts.
B. Use two motor controllers and connect one motor per channel with each motor being programmed on a separate channel (LF, LR, RF, RR)
QUESTIONS
1. Which approach would give us better drive power? Better reliability?
2. Given that the motors on each side are mechanically linked, is it necessary to use Option A or is it just a programming convenience or saves a motor controller?
3. Under Option A, wiring two motors in parallel to one channel should draw twice the current in that channel. Are the controllers able to reliably supply that?
4. Under Option B, if the two motors are always programmed as a sequential two-line operation, will that work or will the motors potentially "fight" one another?
5. Under option B, what if we wired the two front motors to one controller and the two rear motors to the second controller? That way, if one controller died, perhaps we'd still be able to drive?
In short, how would you wire and program the motors and why?
THANKS!
Photo of one side of the prototype drive. The shoulder bolts will be replaced with shorter bolts to eliminate the aluminum spacers outside the wheels.
http://friedbits.com/downloads/DriveTrain-20141118-5.jpg