View Full Version : pic: Division OPR Comparison
joelg236
16-04-2014, 17:50
[cdm-description=photo]40441[/cdm-description]
joelg236
16-04-2014, 17:54
Related - the stats used here and a few extra interesting stats.
http://i.imgur.com/MrrhDs1.png
Stats here (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8oF1GHzyAwHaHdILTk0bkVIdDA/edit?usp=sharing).
Jefferson
16-04-2014, 18:17
I really like the presentation of the data for comparison here. Thanks for putting it together.
I wonder how it would change using average OPR instead of max. Some teams have a pretty significant variation from regional to regional.
And wow... Curie seems to be STACKED at the top.
Abhishek R
16-04-2014, 18:23
This is a great format, really shows a lot of cool relations. Seems like although Curie is stacked up top, it has a weaker middle tier than the other divisions.
joelg236
16-04-2014, 18:24
I really like the presentation of the data for comparison here. Thanks for putting it together.
I wonder how it would change using average OPR instead of max. Some teams have a pretty significant variation from regional to regional.
And wow... Curie seems to be STACKED at the top.
We're definitely one of those teams. Unfortunately, it's hard to tell if a team has a lucky showing (good schedule, etc.) or just got a lot better (I think our team did).
I'll try and do the same analysis with average opr when I get home.
Jefferson
16-04-2014, 19:32
We're definitely one of those teams. Unfortunately, it's hard to tell if a team has a lucky showing (good schedule, etc.) or just got a lot better (I think our team did).
I'll try and do the same analysis with average opr when I get home.
Both metrics definitely have their merits. Teams that improve significantly can get drug down by a regional that's not representative of their abilities.
I really like the presentation of the data for comparison here. Thanks for putting it together.
I wonder how it would change using average OPR instead of max. Some teams have a pretty significant variation from regional to regional.
And wow... Curie seems to be STACKED at the top.
I think 7 out of the top 10 teams are in Curie.
joelg236
16-04-2014, 23:25
More charts for you all
CCWM By Division
http://i.imgur.com/TE0lOJU.png
Top 10 CCWM
http://i.imgur.com/06MKRbJ.jpg
Top 25 CCWM
http://i.imgur.com/AKig0rU.jpg
Top 10 OPR
http://i.imgur.com/vsde1hl.jpg
Top 25 OPR
http://i.imgur.com/kolEcH7.jpg
Tim Lehmann4967
17-04-2014, 08:26
It really looks as if they're attempting to end the Curie Curse! It is a shame Galileo is lacking a bit, but it'll be fun!
It really looks as if they're attempting to end the Curie Curse! It is a shame Galileo is lacking a bit, but it'll be fun!
On the contrary, look at the middle of the pack. Those teams are significantly stronger on Galieo. Remember that an alliance will only be as strong as its "weakest" link. Any alliance coming off of Galileo is going to be very well rounded.
joelg236
17-04-2014, 12:48
On the contrary, look at the middle of the pack. Those teams are significantly stronger on Galieo. Remember that an alliance will only be as strong as its "weakest" link. Any alliance coming off of Galileo is going to be very well rounded.
In OPR only. I wouldn't count out some of our middle tier teams.
Tim Lehmann4967
17-04-2014, 22:16
On the contrary, look at the middle of the pack. Those teams are significantly stronger on Galieo. Remember that an alliance will only be as strong as its "weakest" link. Any alliance coming off of Galileo is going to be very well rounded.
Galileo, while having a lower starting OPR is much more of a well rounded division. Curie, is pretty stacked near the top, and drops off significantly. it would be very cool to watch if there was a alliance made up of those high OPR teams. That is very unlikely to happen though, and to some extent OPR does not mean much in this years game.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.