View Full Version : 2015 High Score
cmrnpizzo14
27-02-2015, 11:12
Let's keep a running tab here for high scores that people have seen (since not everyone checks TBA).
Please post the teams, match #, event, and any details about the match you have.
Ginger Power
27-02-2015, 22:51
What's the highest score so far? I've seen a 124 at Lake Superior but I'm sure that's not the highest given that some teams are averaging over 90.
http://frc-events.usfirst.org/2015/TXDA/rankings
148 is averaging 126 without auton points.
orangemoore
27-02-2015, 23:00
South Florida had a score of 132
Uniwersel
27-02-2015, 23:03
http://frc-events.usfirst.org/2015/TXDA/rankings
148 is averaging 126 without auton points.
Just a heads up, that data stopped updating right before lunch. These are the current standings of Dallas:
1) 987 101.5 avg
2) 148 81.4 avg
3) 118 77.2 avg
4) 1477 76 avg
5) 4300 (only gave the top 4 averages)
6) 4499
7) 2950
8) 647
9) 704
10) 457
11) 3350
12) 5431
Source: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1450861&postcount=4
987 scored 148 in one of their matches.
I believe there was a 135 at the Auburn Mountainview event in the PNW
Bluman56
27-02-2015, 23:12
4488 and 2550 scored 148 points with none of those coming from auton in qualification match 47 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1hSlJTkENo&spfreload=10&ab_channel=PNWFIRSTRobotics) of the Oregon City District Event. It was personally my favorite match of the day.
4488 and 2471 scored 148 points with none of those coming from auton in qualification match 47 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1hSlJTkENo&spfreload=10&ab_channel=PNWFIRSTRobotics) of the Oregon City District Event. It was personally my favorite match of the day.
2471 was on the other alliance.
Bluman56
27-02-2015, 23:17
2471 was on the other alliance.
You are absolutely correct. My apologies.
HailStorm25
28-02-2015, 00:08
PNW District Event at Oregon City, OR
Match #47
Teams: 2550, 4488, 5450 (Blue Alliance)
High Score: 148 points
Its the highest score I've seen so far.
There was already a thread made for this last night. (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=135265)
brandon.cottrell
28-02-2015, 00:16
I can't wait until we look back on this in week 5 or 6 and think about how weird it was that people were only scoring 100ish points, usually less.
RoboChair
28-02-2015, 01:56
There was already a thread made for this last night. (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=135265)
Actually, no. This thread has it beat by almost 12 hours.
jagoldman
28-02-2015, 02:20
Has anyone seen what team 987's robot looks like?
Jay O'Donnell
28-02-2015, 07:00
Has anyone seen what team 987's robot looks like?
You can go through this stream to see some matches from Dallas, some have 987 in them. http://new.livestream.com/accounts/6965108/events/3832663
Ginger Power
28-02-2015, 07:20
Actually, no. This thread has it beat by almost 12 hours.
My bad! I looked through all the recent threads and didn't see one. I didn't bother searching for one because I figured it would be updated fairly regularly. Sorry about that!
jojoguy10
28-02-2015, 08:06
PNW District Event at Oregon City, OR
Match #47
Teams: 2550, 4488, 5450 (Blue Alliance)
High Score: 148 points
Its the highest score I've seen so far.
You guys did awesome that round! Very fun to watch from behind the cameras :-)
See you at Philomath!
Dallas Quals 6 2897 1477 987 148 pts
(unconfirmed. I was watching, and i'm pretty sure this was the score, but they've been having data issues showing results)
987 high rollers are killin it in Dallas. Theyre getting 2 capped stacks plus another cap on a 4ish stack. Their bot is working great and the driver is clearly ready. They're the only team so far that doesn't look like they're in week 1. Obviously having a former world champ with them for this match helped. match 30 with three former world champs didn't quite pan out like most expected. We'll see if the 148/118 combo today can crack 148...
orangemoore
28-02-2015, 13:40
148 and the rest of the their alliance was able to put up 158 points in their most recent match.
Bluman56
28-02-2015, 13:40
Dallas Qualification Match 51
148, 3005, 3676 scored 158 points due to a last second coop stack. Crazy stuff.
148 was able to put up 158 points in their most recent match.
That's 3 capped stacks plus a 5 tote stack from 148. Then the coop stack went from robin to batman to an alliance member who put it nearly on, it almost fell, but then you could see JVN concentrating really hard and the stack defied physics. 46 tote 72 RC + coop
That was a serious wall of totes since they were lengthwise!
MrForbes
28-02-2015, 14:39
3350 987 3735 got 160....
orangemoore
28-02-2015, 14:40
987 got 160....
Evidence
Ginger Power
28-02-2015, 15:28
525, 3130, 4215 just put up 133 points in the playoffs. It was so impressive... no coop points.
orangemoore
28-02-2015, 15:58
178 at Dallas
Noudvanbrunscho
28-02-2015, 15:59
team 148 just got 178 Points. :cool:
3735, 5411 and 148 just put up 178 point in Dallas!
EDIT: I can see we all got very excited :p
Ginger Power
28-02-2015, 16:01
3130, 525, 4215 just put up 152 with no coop in the playoffs. I feel as though this year we will need to define high scores by coop and non-coop.
3130, 525, 4215 just put up 152 with no coop in the playoffs. I feel as though this year we will need to define high scores by coop and non-coop.
coop takes time to execute though. To remove that as a factor I am waiting until elims.
Ginger Power
28-02-2015, 16:28
coop takes time to execute though. To remove that as a factor I am waiting until elims.
It's overvalued for the amount of time it takes imo.
cadandcookies
28-02-2015, 16:37
It's overvalued for the amount of time it takes imo.
Maybe at the very highest levels of play, but after watching every match at Northern Lights, I can say that for the vast majority of teams it's the easiest way to get 40 points.
Ginger Power
28-02-2015, 16:52
Maybe at the very highest levels of play, but after watching every match at Northern Lights, I can say that for the vast majority of teams it's the easiest way to get 40 points.
I meant overvalued as in it's a ton of points for doing something pretty easy. 40 points is more than double what most teams are getting with totes, RC's and auton.
World High is 160 from announcer at IE
World High is 160
Qual or Elim?
Congrats 148,118 and 5057! 196pts
Noudvanbrunscho
28-02-2015, 17:38
196 points in Dallas :)
3130, 525, 4215 at northern lights got 163 at last finals match. Thanks for a great time competing against u guys and thanks for 5172 and 4786 for being a great alliance in the finals:D
QuadFish
28-02-2015, 18:18
196 from 148 and 118 at last qualifies in dallas
http://oi57.tinypic.com/20rqq13.jpg
148, 987, 3802 just put up 215...wow
http://i.imgur.com/MeiPzkh.png
http://i.imgur.com/SsjvzSV.png
Ginger Power
28-02-2015, 22:04
http://i.imgur.com/MeiPzkh.png
http://i.imgur.com/SsjvzSV.png
This post is pure evil. I wasn't able to watch the stream due to volunteering at Duluth. I saw the "video" I freaked out and got really excited only to figure out it's a picture of a video. :mad: :D
(Not really mad)
I_AM_Clayton
28-02-2015, 22:06
215 points
This post is pure evil. I wasn't able to watch the stream due to volunteering at Duluth. I saw the "video" I freaked out and got really excited only to figure out it's a picture of a video. :mad: :D
(Not really mad)
Sorry could not figure how to snip without arrow LOL after rewind
Gaurav27
19-03-2015, 16:34
Unofficial World High Score in a practice Match at Waterloo:
http://s29.postimg.org/dnm7pob3r/highscore.png
DVR Timestamp is at the bottom of the image if you'd like to watch the full match here:
http://new.livestream.com/accounts/12312913/events/3856128
carpedav000
19-03-2015, 17:20
The highest score I have seen in Indy so far was Q37 at the Kokomo District Tournament. 1501 (Team THRUST), 829 (Digital Goats), and 71 (Team Hammond) scored 153.
dsherw00d
19-03-2015, 20:08
2056 and 1114 on the same alliance - c'mon:yikes:
We were on the field with 2056 in Oshawa and then opposite in quarterfinals. When they had their 203 match it was pretty crazy. I watched 1114 on line at the Toronto event. Both incredible. Good news is that they are both already going to Champs, so spots will be open:)
orangemoore
19-03-2015, 20:18
2056 and 1114 on the same alliance - c'mon:yikes:
We were on the field with 2056 in Oshawa and then opposite in quarterfinals. When they had their 203 match it was pretty crazy. I watched 1114 on line at the Toronto event. Both incredible. Good news is that they are both already going to Champs, so spots will be open:)
They are together twice at Waterloo.
It will be interesting.
Match 14 and Match 20
microbuns
19-03-2015, 20:50
We (4917) are with them first (match 14, time is 11:14... it's 1114's time to shine :P). We think we can contribute a fair number of points as well. Here's for hoping for a WR!
WillRobinson
20-03-2015, 11:20
Wouldn't be surprised to see 250+ from 1114 and 2056.
cmrnpizzo14
20-03-2015, 11:24
1114, 2056, and 4917 were amazing with the stacking they were just severely limited by the recycling containers. 1114's grabber didn't seem to be working so they only used the 3 that started on their side. Still put up 202 though, not too shabby. I think that they had 6 or 7 stacks that were all at least 5 high.
Lil' Lavery
20-03-2015, 13:03
1114/2056/2935 just put up 284 in Q20 at Waterloo.
They had 192 with ~55 seconds left. Insane.
Jay O'Donnell
20-03-2015, 13:04
1114/2056/2935 just put up 284 in Q20 at Waterloo.
They had 192 with ~55 seconds left. Insane.
Any video of it besides going through the webcast?
Any video of it besides going through the webcast?
I'll have video of the 284 point match in a few minutes.
Lil' Lavery
20-03-2015, 13:05
Any video of it besides going through the webcast?
Literally just happened. Last match before lunch at Waterloo.
Ginger Power
20-03-2015, 13:05
We're going to need more totes...
Bob Steele
20-03-2015, 13:08
That was 284 including a six point penalty on their alliance.
whew
Video: http://www.watchfirstnow.com/archives/122770292
284 points, only 5 RC's involved...
Nathan Streeter
20-03-2015, 13:40
1114/2056/2935 just put up 284 in Q20 at Waterloo.
They had 192 with ~55 seconds left. Insane.
Absolutely incredible match...
1114 ran their 3-tote auto, then made 3 stacks of 6 with RC and litter from the landfill, and a stack of two totes from the HP station.
2056 ran a 2-RC from step auto (which was unsuccessful), then made 2 stacks of 6 with RC and litter from 1114's ramp, and placed the co-op stack up on the step.
2935 held 1114's ramp without getting the tether stuck anywhere. They almost scored a gray tote from the HP.
20 auto + 40 co-op + 5*42 6-stacks w/noodle + 4 (2 gray totes) + 16 (4 noodles on other side?) - 6pts (1 foul) = 284 pts!!!
Also, in Qual 24 at Waterloo, 1114 just put up 3 6-stacks with noodle and RC! 2 from the landfill (with 58s left, I think) and 1 from the HP station... just using an upside-down gray tote as a 'ramp'... which actually seemed to work quite well for them! (EDIT: I missed the first bit of this match the first time I saw it and incorrectly thought 1114 scored 3 stacks from the landfill and 1 from the HP... I think 1114 actually scored 2 stacks from the landfill and 1 from the HP)
George Nishimura
20-03-2015, 13:47
252 from 1114, 5406, 1285 without co-op. 5406 making this Waterloo regional even more stacked than usual, amazing performance so far. Another incredible Canadian rookie!
I know it just happened, but is there a video of the 252 point match?
George Nishimura
20-03-2015, 13:51
I know it just happened, but is there a video of the 252 point match?
At around 30:45. (http://new.livestream.com/WatchFIRSTNow/events/3856128)
carpedav000
20-03-2015, 14:49
1024 (Kil-A-Bytes), 135 (The Black Knights), and 5010 just scored 178 in Q27 at Purdue.
Wired_Mike
20-03-2015, 15:12
Quals 20 at Waterloo... 1114, 2056, and 2935 just put up a score 284.
ArtemusMaximus
20-03-2015, 15:33
Quals 20 at Waterloo... 1114, 2056, and 2935 just put up a score 284.
That was nice round. Nicely Done 1114!
http://www.watchfirstnow.com/archives/122770292
We made the high score with 4091, and 744 in match 94 at the Orlando regional. We scored 172
1114/2056/2935 just put up 284 in Q20 at Waterloo.
They had 192 with ~55 seconds left. Insane.
Here's an HD full-field video of the match: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTz0ezZKMHQ
2137, 1918, and 4967 scored 228 at West Michigan. Could have been 248 but 4967 missed their 3-tote auto that they have been hitting fairly regularly.
Here's an HD full-field video of the match: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTz0ezZKMHQ
Steve Bezos just called and said he wants those 3 robots for Amazon's new mega mile wherehouse....They want to lay off an entire shift of people. That is amazing at 284 points.
Imagine how many bins an hour stacked 6 high that would be? LOL
We're going to need more totes...
Yes, I missed the prediction by a week...I said someone would be out of useable bullets (field pcs. by week 3), week 4 would be good, get crackin' 1114 and company! (Although 1114 is a Top Notch Company already in their own right....But, it never is bad to hire or at least invite good, or even better, excellent help along either!)
Is a Championship 300+ or 350+ match, out of the question. (A great combo fast canburgler, and tote flipper, and stacker is all they need to use them all up!) 1114 gobbles those totes in record time. I'd swear that bot was alive. (Who's brain did you implant?)
RoboChair
21-03-2015, 01:07
Five Stacks the Legend!
Here's an HD full-field video of the match: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTz0ezZKMHQ
Just watched that 5 times over, that slide of the 2 rows down to steal the 2 Shelf RC's is sweet, now iterrate something that slides between shelf and the upsidedown totes and just flips the whole row upright so 1114 can gobble and stack those up too. Sweeeet stackin' boys & girls.
Hate the game all you want, it can be outright exciting at times. (How many of you will ever be asked in a future career to build a robot that plays frisbee or basketball...And how many will be asked to task a robot to work in a factory or wherehouse in the future...Or on MARS, and beyond!) A whole lot more of the latter than the former I hope...For $$$$'s then too. Instead of just fun.
I can see the Engineer mentors that already do that for $$$'s being disappointed though. But, we need to give the GDC a break, those particular machines in that vid are a wonder to behold and watch.
1114/2056/2935 just put up 284 in Q20 at Waterloo.
They had 192 with ~55 seconds left. Insane.
____________________________
Homework for a student math wiz please (No Mentors please...Put away that engineering calculator...Yes, I saw you).
With the increase from 4 to eight Divisional Fields, and a Max. 400 bot field increased to a Max. 600 bot strong invite list to The FIRST FRC Championships.
What are the mathematical odds that under the old, and the new rules 1114/2056/2935 will or could possibly end up in the same Division this year under a completely blind draw? Looking forward to an answer by opening day of The Championships math wizzes.
Play together while you can I say. (It may be your very last chance).
____________________________
Homework for a student math wiz please (No Mentors please...Put away that engineering calculator...Yes, I saw you).
With the increase from 4 to eight Divisional Fields, and a Max. 400 bot field increased to a Max. 600 bot strong invite list to The FIRST FRC Championships.
What are the mathematical odds that under the old, and the new rules 1114/2056/2935 will or could possibly end up in the same Division this year under a completely blind draw? Looking forward to an answer by opening day of The Championships math wizzes.
Play together while you can I say. (It may be your very last chance).
Edit: missed the bit where it was aimed at students.
The math is simple probability.
waialua359
21-03-2015, 05:30
Yes, I missed the prediction by a week...I said someone would be out of useable bullets (field pcs. by week 3), week 4 would be good, get crackin' 1114 and company! (Although 1114 is a Top Notch Company already in their own right....But, it never is bad to hire or at least invite good, or even better, excellent help along either!)
Is a Championship 300+ or 350+ match, out of the question. (A great combo fast canburgler, and tote flipper, and stacker is all they need to use them all up!) 1114 gobbles those totes in record time. I'd swear that bot was alive. (Who's brain did you implant?)
I doubt that 350 can be achieved during eliminations, especially at CMPs during eliminations.
40 from coopertition is huge, especially when going for a high score. At CMPs, eliminations will feature many great alliances where going for step bins will negate some of the opportunities for alliances to get the RCs.
Would love to be proven wrong.
alexander.h
21-03-2015, 14:06
Not the top score overall, but certainly the high score at the Montreal Regional for the time being with 2590, 3360 and 5528 putting up 204 points during the fourth match of the playoffs.
1114/2056/5719 just put up 280 in eliminations SF2
1114 built 3 capped/littered 6stacks plus an extra 6stack. (and canswiped 3 cans)
2056 built 2 capped/littered 6stacks plus a capped/littered 5stack.
1114/2056/5719 just put up 280 in eliminations SF1
1114 built 3 capped/littered 6stacks plus an extra 6stack. (and canswiped 3 cans)
2056 built 2 capped/littered 6stacks plus a capped/littered 5stack.
They used all the totes except 3. (not including totes upside down or on the bump)
With the increase from 4 to eight Divisional Fields, and a Max. 400 bot field increased to a Max. 600 bot strong invite list to The FIRST FRC Championships.
What are the mathematical odds that under the old, and the new rules 1114/2056/2935 will or could possibly end up in the same Division this year under a completely blind draw? Looking forward to an answer by opening day of The Championships math wizzes.
I'm a mentor. I'm here to say that it's very slim. Because, you see, the "old" rules are just about the same as the new rules.
Why, you ask? Because it's simple: You're placed in a division by order of entry (with payment, IIRC). For any given three teams to end up in the same division, they would need to register X spots apart, where X is the number of divisions. You can't know how many spots apart you actually register, however. So it's very difficult, and solving with pure stats is probably going to inflate the numbers a smidge. But you solve the problem in the exact same way, just with X being 2X for the new way.
Oh, and then you have to factor in 1114's CCA. Means they'd be one of the first teams to register.
I'm a mentor. I'm here to say that it's very slim. Because, you see, the "old" rules are just about the same as the new rules.
Why, you ask? Because it's simple: You're placed in a division by order of entry (with payment, IIRC). For any given three teams to end up in the same division, they would need to register X spots apart, where X is the number of divisions. You can't know how many spots apart you actually register, however. So it's very difficult, and solving with pure stats is probably going to inflate the numbers a smidge. But you solve the problem in the exact same way, just with X being 2X for the new way.
Oh, and then you have to factor in 1114's CCA. Means they'd be one of the first teams to register.
I thought that stopped being true a number of years ago, and nowadays your division assignment is strictly random.
If I'm right, its just simple 1/<N-divisions> likelihood of being in a division with a specific team.
1114/2056/5719 just put up 280 in eliminations SF2
HD full-field video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HweJQKTZm_Q)
I thought that stopped being true a number of years ago, and nowadays your division assignment is strictly random.
If I'm right, its just simple 1/<N-divisions> likelihood of being in a division with a specific team.
Nope.
Previously: Take all teams in a list sorted by number. Go down the list: 1, 2, 3, 4, repeat. (If you're sneaky, reverse a few.) Sort by assigned numbers 1-4. That's the divisional list, and it was so predictable that CD could guess EASILY what the divisions would be based on the team list.
Then they changed it, and it LOOKS strictly random. Now that first list is sorted by registration order for CMP. It's been that way for a few years. Frank noted it in a blog about a year ago, I think (timewise). The only change is that now there are more divisions.
blarson001
23-03-2015, 10:13
High score at the Wisconsin regional was 216 in the semis with 2062, 2826, and 2530
Top10 Alliance Final Scores (Qual Matches) Weeks 1 through 4
event Match r1 r2 r3 b1 b2 b3 rs bs ra ba rf bf rs+bs ra+ba rf+bf sMax aMax fMax
ONWA 20 2935 1114 2056 5158 4308 4039 284 105 20 0 6 12 389 20 18 284 20 12
ONWA 24 5719 1305 5158 1114 5406 1285 22 252 0 20 12 0 274 20 12 252 20 12
MIWMI 47 4995 3234 2405 4967 2137 1918 71 228 8 0 0 0 299 8 0 228 8 0
ILIL 38 648 1701 2220 2481 3201 4096 57 215 0 20 0 0 272 20 0 215 20 0
ONWA 14 2056 1114 4917 865 244 5158 208 32 20 0 0 0 240 20 0 208 20 0
ONWA 36 1114 244 1241 216 4917 5719 207 47 20 0 0 0 254 20 0 207 20 0
ONWA 46 4618 1676 1114 4917 3161 2056 207 192 20 20 0 6 399 40 6 207 20 6
ARFA 80 418 2200 3284 1208 2451 2481 82 206 0 20 0 0 288 20 0 206 20 0
MOSL 82 5492 3284 4330 4256 1986 2783 113 204 0 20 6 0 317 20 6 204 20 6
ONTO 54 2852 2056 1246 781 1241 5076 202 78 20 0 0 0 280 20 0 202 20 0
Top10 Total Match Final Scores (Qual Matches) Weeks 1 through 4
event Match r1 r2 r3 b1 b2 b3 rs bs ra ba rf bf rs+bs ra+ba rf+bf sMax aMax fMax
ONWA 46 4618 1676 1114 4917 3161 2056 207 192 20 20 0 6 399 40 6 207 20 6
ONWA 20 2935 1114 2056 5158 4308 4039 284 105 20 0 6 12 389 20 18 284 20 12
MOSL 82 5492 3284 4330 4256 1986 2783 113 204 0 20 6 0 317 20 6 204 20 6
NYTR 44 1493 195 287 870 263 340 162 150 0 0 0 0 312 0 0 162 0 0
ONWA 3 4039 4807 5406 1241 4907 2056 140 170 0 0 0 0 310 0 0 170 0 0
UTWV 76 1619 3289 4175 3245 192 5071 172 137 0 0 0 0 309 0 0 172 0 0
ILIL 74 2481 2040 4314 3201 2512 938 165 142 20 20 0 0 307 40 0 165 20 0
ONWA 41 4678 5406 4618 3683 4308 1285 126 180 20 0 0 0 306 20 0 180 20 0
ONWA 54 2056 5406 329 4618 4907 216 202 102 0 0 0 0 304 0 0 202 0 0
CASA 75 295 1280 2643 100 2073 2085 156 144 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 156 0 0
tr6scott
23-03-2015, 12:32
https://youtu.be/MLtHtbcM_CY
Video of the Qualifications 228 put up in West Michigan.
Citrus Dad
23-03-2015, 12:33
Is a Championship 300+ or 350+ match, out of the question. (A great combo fast canburgler, and tote flipper, and stacker is all they need to use them all up!) 1114 gobbles those totes in record time. I'd swear that bot was alive. (Who's brain did you implant?)
See discussions elsewhere about Einstein and division final strategies. High scores in those matches are more likely in the 250 range as alliances play to win, not rack up high points. There's a difference in this year's game.
I know it's not the overall high score, but the high at Virginia this week was 155 during Semifinal 4.
Lil' Lavery
23-03-2015, 12:50
See discussions elsewhere about Einstein and division final strategies. High scores in those matches are more likely in the 250 range as alliances play to win, not rack up high points. There's a difference in this year's game.
Einstein still has quarterfinals and semifinals where teams need to play for averages.
JamesBrown
23-03-2015, 13:09
HD full-field video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HweJQKTZm_Q)
They make this game look incredibly easy.
They used all the totes except 3. (not including totes upside down or on the bump)
By champs elimination alliances could be running out of totes. With some of the great stacking robots also having quick can grabbers from the step, the wise 3rd pick may not be the fast can grabber but instead the upside down and step tote manipulator. If an alliance can ensure they get 2 of the 4 step cans then they can win through sheer number of totes.
MaGiC_PiKaChU
23-03-2015, 22:35
Not the top score overall, but certainly the high score at the Montreal Regional for the time being with 2590, 3360 and 5528 putting up 204 points during the fourth match of the playoffs.
here it is : http://www.watchfirstnow.com/archives/122923941
jvriezen
24-03-2015, 09:58
High score at the Wisconsin regional was 216 in the semis with 2062, 2826, and 2530
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grH3fj9SS2k
stewie2013
24-03-2015, 14:00
280 points in waterloo by some crazy canucks https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/11081352_924198740978513_698903409113848582_n.jpg? oh=6f050770e38fb1f5d5e99e4ca538fe09&oe=55BBC7B2&__gda__=1438147699_b3b4a3acbd516a06fbbbe812f01f309 e
215 points by the blue alliance (2481, 4096, 3201) in Q38 at CIR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xyg05LTih3Y
EricLeifermann
24-03-2015, 14:38
Nope.
Previously: Take all teams in a list sorted by number. Go down the list: 1, 2, 3, 4, repeat. (If you're sneaky, reverse a few.) Sort by assigned numbers 1-4. That's the divisional list, and it was so predictable that CD could guess EASILY what the divisions would be based on the team list.
Then they changed it, and it LOOKS strictly random. Now that first list is sorted by registration order for CMP. It's been that way for a few years. Frank noted it in a blog about a year ago, I think (timewise). The only change is that now there are more divisions.
Here (http://www.usfirst.org/roboticsprograms/frc/blog-Divisions-and-Preliminary-Match-Schedules)is the blog post.
blaze8902
25-04-2015, 15:02
Hopper division, Semi 1-2
987, 2826, 2512. 290pts.
Edit:Read Blue Alliance info wrong. Fixed.
Edit edit: Actually it's just wrong on the blue Alliance
EricLeifermann
25-04-2015, 15:03
Hopper division, Semi 1-2
987, 2826, 4265. 290pts.
We played with 2512 in that match not 4265.
blaze8902
25-04-2015, 21:01
Fixed. It's wrong on the Blue Alliance, or at least the mobile app if that matters.
WillNess
26-04-2015, 00:07
What was the whole seasons high score over every event?
What was the whole seasons high score over every event?
290, today in Hopper Semifinal 2.
WillNess
26-04-2015, 00:23
290, today in Hopper Semifinal 2.
It's sad that we never got to 300 :(
There's always IRI, right? We're heading to China again, so it won't be us:D
WillNess
26-04-2015, 13:20
Does anyone have a video to Hopper Semifinal 2?
Does anyone have a video to Hopper Semifinal 2?
I know we have it recorded. It will probably be uploaded when we get back to Vegas.
WillNess
26-04-2015, 13:45
I know we have it recorded. It will probably be uploaded when we get back to Vegas.
Cool can you PM me when it is?
I know we have it recorded. It will probably be uploaded when we get back to Vegas.
Can you PM me also?::rtm::
Does anyone have a video to Hopper Semifinal 2?
Team 1676 (https://www.youtube.com/user/Team1676) recorded HD 1080p60 footage of all the qualification and elimination matches on Hopper, including Semifinal 2, as well as the Einstein matches, which should begin uploading later this evening.
EDIT: Here's our full-field video from Hopper Semifinal 2, with the offical high score of 290 points https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3h6WeeZBRI
I also have a recording of the highest scoring match, Semifinal 2 on Hopper.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL-NnuZzOkU
Noudvanbrunscho
27-04-2015, 09:10
Sad that it's not 300+ :(. i bet it will happen at some offseason events though.
EricLeifermann
27-04-2015, 11:07
Sad that it's not 300+ :(. i bet it will happen at some offseason events though.
It would have been 302 had We, 2826, not goofed around with a tote alignment at the feeder station and 987 stacked the last 3 totes they had.
No complaints though, it was an awesome match and an even more awesome weekend.
Dog-n-Pony Show
29-04-2015, 05:45
The two highest qualification round scores at St. Louis came from Curie: score 278 by 148, 1114 and 369 (match 104) and score 270 by 3663, 303 and 4143 (match 78).
Dog-n-Pony Show
29-04-2015, 06:02
Where do you get the data for these? I'd love to see the results for the top 100 for 2015, both individual team and combined match scores.
Top10 Alliance Final Scores (Qual Matches) Weeks 1 through 4
event Match r1 r2 r3 b1 b2 b3 rs bs ra ba rf bf rs+bs ra+ba rf+bf sMax aMax fMax
ONWA 20 2935 1114 2056 5158 4308 4039 284 105 20 0 6 12 389 20 18 284 20 12
ONWA 24 5719 1305 5158 1114 5406 1285 22 252 0 20 12 0 274 20 12 252 20 12
MIWMI 47 4995 3234 2405 4967 2137 1918 71 228 8 0 0 0 299 8 0 228 8 0
ILIL 38 648 1701 2220 2481 3201 4096 57 215 0 20 0 0 272 20 0 215 20 0
ONWA 14 2056 1114 4917 865 244 5158 208 32 20 0 0 0 240 20 0 208 20 0
ONWA 36 1114 244 1241 216 4917 5719 207 47 20 0 0 0 254 20 0 207 20 0
ONWA 46 4618 1676 1114 4917 3161 2056 207 192 20 20 0 6 399 40 6 207 20 6
ARFA 80 418 2200 3284 1208 2451 2481 82 206 0 20 0 0 288 20 0 206 20 0
MOSL 82 5492 3284 4330 4256 1986 2783 113 204 0 20 6 0 317 20 6 204 20 6
ONTO 54 2852 2056 1246 781 1241 5076 202 78 20 0 0 0 280 20 0 202 20 0
Top10 Total Match Final Scores (Qual Matches) Weeks 1 through 4
event Match r1 r2 r3 b1 b2 b3 rs bs ra ba rf bf rs+bs ra+ba rf+bf sMax aMax fMax
ONWA 46 4618 1676 1114 4917 3161 2056 207 192 20 20 0 6 399 40 6 207 20 6
ONWA 20 2935 1114 2056 5158 4308 4039 284 105 20 0 6 12 389 20 18 284 20 12
MOSL 82 5492 3284 4330 4256 1986 2783 113 204 0 20 6 0 317 20 6 204 20 6
NYTR 44 1493 195 287 870 263 340 162 150 0 0 0 0 312 0 0 162 0 0
ONWA 3 4039 4807 5406 1241 4907 2056 140 170 0 0 0 0 310 0 0 170 0 0
UTWV 76 1619 3289 4175 3245 192 5071 172 137 0 0 0 0 309 0 0 172 0 0
ILIL 74 2481 2040 4314 3201 2512 938 165 142 20 20 0 0 307 40 0 165 20 0
ONWA 41 4678 5406 4618 3683 4308 1285 126 180 20 0 0 0 306 20 0 180 20 0
ONWA 54 2056 5406 329 4618 4907 216 202 102 0 0 0 0 304 0 0 202 0 0
CASA 75 295 1280 2643 100 2073 2085 156 144 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 156 0 0
Where do you get the data for these?
From here (http://frc-events.usfirst.org/) or here (http://www.thebluealliance.com/events) or here (http://docs.frcevents.apiary.io/) or here (http://www.thebluealliance.com/apidocs).
I'd love to see the results for the top 100 for 2015, both individual team and combined match scores.
Go to the link below and download the attachment named Weeks1-7 raw data (Qual&Playoff Matches, Team Rankings)
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/3127
For alliance qual (or playoff) scores, open Q.CSV (or P.CSV) in Excel, and sort it any way you like.
For "average" team qual scores, use R.CSV column D "Qual" divided by 3... or use OPR or some other metric. The only way to get true individual team scores is from manual scouting data.
You can find CMP Qual Match raw data and analysis here (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/3132).
Dog-n-Pony Show
30-04-2015, 01:30
Thanks for that info - very helpful! The only thing I am still missing is the stats for the Championship Subdivision Playoffs and for Einstein. Are those available somewhere?
From here (http://frc-events.usfirst.org/) or here (http://www.thebluealliance.com/events) or here (http://docs.frcevents.apiary.io/) or here (http://www.thebluealliance.com/apidocs).
Go to the link below and download the attachment named Weeks1-7 raw data (Qual&Playoff Matches, Team Rankings)
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/3127
For alliance qual (or playoff) scores, open Q.CSV (or P.CSV) in Excel, and sort it any way you like.
For "average" team qual scores, use R.CSV column D "Qual" divided by 3... or use OPR or some other metric. The only way to get true individual team scores is from manual scouting data.
You can find CMP Qual Match raw data and analysis here (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/3132).
Thanks for that info - very helpful! The only thing I am still missing is the stats for the Championship Subdivision Playoffs and for Einstein. Are those available somewhere?
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/download/4448
It would have been 302 had We, 2826, not goofed around with a tote alignment at the feeder station and 987 stacked the last 3 totes they had.
No complaints though, it was an awesome match and an even more awesome weekend.
I have to agree. Even if it wasn't 300+ points I'm not gonna complain. No matter how much 300+ would of been awesome I really don't care. 290 was good enough.
EricLeifermann
30-04-2015, 12:30
Interestingly, 2826 has the high score on every field we played on(counting the 2 Einstein fields as 1 field). 216 in Wisconsin, 268 in North Star, 290 on Hopper and 283 on Einstein.
trilogy2826
30-04-2015, 12:31
Deleted - Eric Beat me to it
Highest combined score: 498 in Semis 5 on Einstein
Looks like we didn't crack 500! Although I didn't do the Ether/Basel -esque data analysis to confirm this.
RyanShoff
01-05-2015, 13:10
top 10 alliance scores all 11793 matches using Ether's data:
event Match r1 r2 r3 b1 b2 b3 rs bs sMax
HOPPER 10 987 2826 2512 3255 1723 3042 290 166 290
ONWA 20 2935 1114 2056 5158 4308 4039 284 105 284
CMP 13 987 2826 2512 1023 3996 2338 283 215 283
HOPPER 8 987 2826 2512 5413 78 2016 282 108 282
ONWA 10 2056 1114 5719 4917 4678 3161 280 112 280
CURIE 104 148 369 1114 2994 4146 1816 278 145 278
ARCHIME 14 1023 3996 2338 314 2974 4451 274 108 274
CMP 9 1114 148 1923 1023 3996 2338 272 210 272
CMP 11 1114 148 1923 987 2826 2512 190 271 271
CURIE 78 3663 303 4143 4613 56 4468 270 124 270
Oddly strong bias towards the red alliance...
Whether the matches are quals or elims was lost when combining all the sheets.
Whether the matches are quals or elims was lost when combining all the sheets.
HOPPER P 10
ONWA Q 20
CMP P 13
HOPPER P 8
ONWA P 10
CURIE Q 104
ARCH P 14
CMP P 9
CMP P 11
CURIE Q 78
top 10 alliance scores all 11793 matches using Ether's data:
event Match r1 r2 r3 b1 b2 b3 rs bs sMax
HOPPER 10 987 2826 2512 3255 1723 3042 290 166 290
ONWA 20 2935 1114 2056 5158 4308 4039 284 105 284
CMP 13 987 2826 2512 1023 3996 2338 283 215 283
HOPPER 8 987 2826 2512 5413 78 2016 282 108 282
ONWA 10 2056 1114 5719 4917 4678 3161 280 112 280
CURIE 104 148 369 1114 2994 4146 1816 278 145 278
ARCHIME 14 1023 3996 2338 314 2974 4451 274 108 274
CMP 9 1114 148 1923 1023 3996 2338 272 210 272
CMP 11 1114 148 1923 987 2826 2512 190 271 271
CURIE 78 3663 303 4143 4613 56 4468 270 124 270
Oddly strong bias towards the red alliance...
Whether the matches are quals or elims was lost when combining all the sheets.
HOPPER P 10
ONWA Q 20
CMP P 13
HOPPER P 8
ONWA P 10
CURIE Q 104
ARCH P 14
CMP P 9
CMP P 11
CURIE Q 78
Since the high seed played red in playoffs, six out of seven isn't too surprising. Three for three in quals is curious, but only a seven-to-one shot.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.