pic: Top 20 teams' OPRs compared via standard deviation distribution - 2008-2015

[Citrus Dad]

[cdm-description=photo]41819[/cdm-description]

[Lil' Lavery]

So.... 1114 has built the two best robots of the 3v3 era?

Seriously though, cool chart. A lot of interesting data here, even if it's packed in there pretty tight. Any chance we can get the .xls?

[Kevin Leonard]

This is incredibly cool and informative. It shows how much better the 99th percentile is each year compared to the 90th percentile team, and how different games and teams have made that the way it is.

[Nathan Streeter]

This is incredibly cool and informative. It shows how much better the 99th percentile is each year compared to the 90th percentile team, and how different games and teams have made that the way it is.

For the record... this graph only shows the top 99th percentile (or so). With >2000 teams in FRC, the top 20 are the 99th percentile.

[Kevin Leonard]

For the record... this graph only shows the top 99th percentile (or so). With >2000 teams in FRC, the top 20 are the 99th percentile.

Shhhhhh

[Citrus Dad]

This is incredibly cool and informative. It shows how much better the 99th percentile is each year compared to the 90th percentile team, and how different games and teams have made that the way it is.

Here's the one you want:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=136227

[Citrus Dad]

So.... 1114 has built the two best robots of the 3v3 era?

Seriously though, cool chart. A lot of interesting data here, even if it's packed in there pretty tight. Any chance we can get the .xls?

Here's the file:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/3123

BTW, one tweak--I used the 2015 OPR net of coop points because I wanted to isolate individual team contribution as much as possible. The distribution isn't much different with coop pts included.