pic: Archimedes Scouting: OPR vs. Robot Performance

[evanperryg]

[cdm-description=photo]42131[/cdm-description]

[SoftwareBug2.0]

Have you considered a scatter plot?

[GeeTwo]

While there is a definite correlation between OPR and performance, as I read this, in order to find the #2 scoring team (top left), you would have had to reach down to about #12 or #15 in OPR.

[Ether]

...the average points they actually contributed

Where did you get "the average points they actually contributed"? From manual scouting?

[Abhishek R]

The fact that there are only 4 blue circles rather than a full spectrum from red to blue indicates a dropoff in points actually contributed. However, there is a pretty good variety of circle sizes, so it seems like there wasn't a large dropoff in OPR. Would it be possible to get a scatterplot of this for clarity?

[evanperryg]

I do have a scatter plot, I'll put it up tonight!
Oh, and the color is based on manual scouting data. It takes into account all aspects of autonomous and teleop scoring, excluding co-op.

[Bennett548]

I'm guessing there was a dropoff in points scored because a good robot that can score 3x capped stacks in qualifications will have a high OPR, but in playoff they won't necessarily have 3 cans and 18+ totes to use because they are sharing them with the other high scoring team on their alliance.

Playoff scores were higher on average, but a really good robot's individual contribution doesn't have much room to grow.

Edit: I mis-read the description of the graph, I thought it was circle size=qual OPR, color=playoff average contribution.