Log in

View Full Version : Speed Test!


MattK
02-03-2004, 06:44
I'm the Webmaster for www.chaos131.com and it seems that our server might be running a bit slow.

I would appreciate it if you could visit our site and give me a bit of info back about how fast it loaded (if at all :D ).


All input is greatly appreciated!

-Matt

jacob_dilles
02-03-2004, 06:54
9.5 seconds on 1.5MbPS cable... that would be about 2 and a half minuts on dialup. very well desigend but for accsesablity you might wana cut down on the pics

Jay H 237
02-03-2004, 06:54
It came right up for me, about two to three seconds. I'll also tell you I'm connecting through a LAN to a broadband cable modem.

edomus
02-03-2004, 07:06
2 seconds through 300kbs dsl

Steve W
02-03-2004, 07:06
At 7:00 am about 4 seconds on 1.5 DSL.

David66
02-03-2004, 07:10
1.5 seconds appx. comcast cable connection through LAN

Brandon Martus
02-03-2004, 08:07
from the chiefdelphi.com server:

[/home/chiefdel]# ping chaos131.com
PING chaos131.com (64.202.167.129) from 216.7.168.120 : 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from ip-64-202-167-129.secureserver.net (64.202.167.129): icmp_seq=1 ttl=114 time=41.1 ms
64 bytes from ip-64-202-167-129.secureserver.net (64.202.167.129): icmp_seq=2 ttl=114 time=41.1 ms
[chop]
64 bytes from ip-64-202-167-129.secureserver.net (64.202.167.129): icmp_seq=45 ttl=114 time=41.0 ms
64 bytes from ip-64-202-167-129.secureserver.net (64.202.167.129): icmp_seq=46 ttl=114 time=44.9 ms
64 bytes from ip-64-202-167-129.secureserver.net (64.202.167.129): icmp_seq=47 ttl=114 time=41.0 ms

--- chaos131.com ping statistics ---
47 packets transmitted, 47 received, 0% loss, time 46461ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.965/41.633/47.120/1.163 ms


(post website topics in the website forum next time, please.)

ahecht
02-03-2004, 09:05
I'm the Webmaster for www.chaos131.com and it seems that our server might be running a bit slow.

I would appreciate it if you could visit our site and give me a bit of info back about how fast it loaded (if at all :D ).

Loading wasn't that bad, but I didn't like the pop-up. I'd ditch no-ip.org and go with a dynamic ip service such as freedns.afraid.org (http://freedns.afraid.org) that doesn't impose any type of ads.

deltacoder1020
02-03-2004, 11:04
or use one of the most well-known free dns sites out there, www.dyndns.org

as for the site itself... matt, you see that nice big text to the left of the pictures on the front page (the quote by kelso)? there's no need for that to be an image, and text loads a heck of a lot faster. the buttons up top are each a different image, but you could just make one background image and then put text on top of each one. for the pictures down at the bottom (the links to the photos, acrobat reader, email, and kickoff), the GIF file format would probably work better, because the images are mostly large blocks of single colors, rather than photo-type images. finally, the "history" page is so chock full of images it isn't even funny - you could probably make most of the images into text, and it would be simpler to read as well.

that's my $.02 of constructive criticism :)

MattK
02-03-2004, 15:05
Thanks for the input everyone! Brandon, I completely forgot about the website forum (I was trying to finish up homework, brush my teeth and post on CD at the same time this morning) sorry.

I have considered taking away some of the images from the site, its just with images I know they will display the same on almost every system.

Has anyone experienced REALLY slow load times (something over 5 or 6 seconds)?


Thanks again,
Matt

iBob
02-03-2004, 17:18
On my wireless network hooked up to dsl it loaded in maybe 2 seconds.

P.S. That site looks a lot like my favorite computer company's...

MattK
02-03-2004, 19:27
On my wireless network hooked up to dsl it loaded in maybe 2 seconds.

P.S. That site looks a lot like my favorite computer company's...

:D

Petey
02-03-2004, 19:35
Thanks for the input everyone! Brandon, I completely forgot about the website forum (I was trying to finish up homework, brush my teeth and post on CD at the same time this morning) sorry.

I have considered taking away some of the images from the site, its just with images I know they will display the same on almost every system.

Has anyone experienced REALLY slow load times (something over 5 or 6 seconds)?


Thanks again,
Matt

For the entire page to load, yes, but my school network isn't the fastest thing in the world. I don't think that it was exceptionally slow.

Nice looking site, Matt.

--Petey

squide
02-03-2004, 20:37
6 seconds - RoadRunner Hawaii

Elgin Clock
02-03-2004, 20:41
It came right up for me, about two to three seconds. I'll also tell you I'm connecting through a LAN to a broadband cable modem.
Same exact situation here...

jacob_dilles
02-03-2004, 21:36
9-10 mbps cable modem.
Nice Work! :)

9-10 mips modem I WANT ONE!!! lol im at 1.5 with COX its tearable

MattK
02-03-2004, 22:43
I WANT ONE TOO! I am "stuck" at 2.5 on comcast!

Racer26
18-03-2004, 17:32
I WANT ONE TOO! I am "stuck" at 2.5 on comcast!

Pssh. HAHAHAHA. I am "stuck" at..... wait for it to load...... 28.8kbps dialup! but I only pay $10 CANADIAN/mo for it, so i cant complain too much

RoteAugen
18-03-2004, 17:44
hey ManchCentral!

it was instantaneous on Adelphia Cable in Amherst, NH.. though I'm not sure if that has to do with distance lol.

hope the traffic on sunday isn't too bad when the Pats come :yikes:

seeya in atlanta!

PS- oo! before I go, if you guys need any parts or anything, let us know.. We take care of our neighbors; especially in far off lands such as georgia

Elgin Clock
21-03-2004, 04:43
Pssh. HAHAHAHA. I am "stuck" at..... wait for it to load...... 28.8kbps dialup! but I only pay $10 CANADIAN/mo for it, so i cant complain too much
28.8? Are you in the dark ages up there in Canada??? I don't think anyone is stuck using 28.8k anymore in the US. I think that 56k is the standard now - and you can get that for $10 a month here.

Aaron Knight
21-03-2004, 20:45
Very quick (a few seconds) on residential cable.

Sidenote: You may wish to modify your design so Apple legal (http://www.apple.com) doesn't deside to come after y'all with a cease and desist.