Log in

View Full Version : team 33 tranny info


ajlapp
29-06-2004, 15:46
just wondering if team 33 was planning or has already published information about their transmission from this season. hopefully a whitepaper is coming soon, but in the meantime i'd love some decent pictures and a little description. thanks.

Paul H
29-06-2004, 16:39
I'll see Jim next tuesday and see what he's doing with the whitepaper. It's not out yet. I'll try to get some closeups at IRI


This page (http://www.firstwiki.org/index.php/Four_speed_transmission) has some info on it.

Random tidbits that I can think of:
-It's obviously 2 two speed trannies in series
-It's made with a lathe and a mill....or a drill press with a moving table.
-The gears are heat treated pinion rod. We turned them down on the lathe and had them heat treated.
-Yes, the gears will be fine if you heat treat them, and we filed the edges a bit just to be safe. You wouldn't want to use this method if you were designing a transmission for a go kart or something, but for the amount of time a robot is used, it should be fine. We went to three regionals, nationals, and will attend 3 offseasons.
-The side panels are polycarbonate of some sort
-That is actually a big version of the tranny in the picture. It can be compressed down to roughly half the size by staggering the shafts rather than having them in a straight line.
-The automation code uses a shaft encoder that is actually in the transmission, but our demo used banner sensors. Same concept, it bases the shifting on the output RPM.
-There is obviously no motor matching in it, we used #35 chain to match the speeds of the drill gearboxes in low and chips, exactly like the martians (494) did in 2003, and put the output into the transmission
-The transmissions can be mounted between the wheels
-The motor pan/mounts weighed about a pound, it was a folded sheet of aluminum.
-You can also make a rock solid, feather light 2 speed transmission with this method, just build half of it.


Here's something I threw together in Paint, it would be our robot's drivetrain this year if it wasn't for the climbing system.

Paul H
29-06-2004, 16:42
Just looked at that picture again. Obviously, the slave chain between the wheels would have to clear above and below the transmission in the above view, I don't know what I was thinking.

Also, the motor reduction occurs after the transmission. Rather than building it in, we just reduce it between the transmission and the wheel by putting a big sprocket on the wheel and a small one in the transmission (obviously)

ajlapp
30-06-2004, 18:04
thanks for the info.....i talked with jim on several occassions about the tranny, but what i'd really love are some decent pictures. i may be ar iri, but if i'm not please take some basic photos of the gear switching components and post them for me. thanks again.

Billfred
02-07-2004, 03:06
I'm just thinking out loud...

According to my sources, 33's version had the tranny shift on the fly, complete with shift points and everything.

Given that our programming department is sorely lacking, wouldn't it be possible to set up a bump-shifting setup and get World Rally on things? Just set up a switch and a small shifter a driver could nudge with a free hand.

(And count me on the list of people awaiting this white paper. This might just be the next killer app in FIRST.)

ajlapp
02-07-2004, 13:53
actually the demo version of the tranny was setup as a sequential style gearbox. clicking the trigger advanced one gear up, another click went another gear up and so on, then the thumb would walk you back down. obviously this can get hectic on the field so an automatic shift scheduler was used to take the burden of the drivers.

Paul H
03-07-2004, 13:53
Yeah, you could do the bump shifting, but one reason that the whitepaper isn't out yet is because Jim es working on making a totally generic code. He will distribute the code with the whitepaper, so everyone who builds the transmission can have it automated if they choose.

I'll get pictures at IRI.

Joshua May
03-07-2004, 14:02
Yeah, you could do the bump shifting, but one reason that the whitepaper isn't out yet is because Jim es working on making a totally generic code. He will distribute the code with the whitepaper, so everyone who builds the transmission can have it automated if they choose.

I'll get pictures at IRI.

Awesome, you guys are too much.

RogerR
03-07-2004, 14:10
where did you guys buy the pinion rod for the gears?

sanddrag
03-07-2004, 14:44
where did you guys buy the pinion rod for the gears?I'm guessing SDP but they may have gotten it locally.

phrontist
03-07-2004, 19:02
I went to the killer bees booth at least three or four times to watch their demo box, and sent everyone from my team to see it at least once. Here are some of my impressions:

* Shifting is extremely smooth. They would rev up the gearbox, hit a button and it changed in the blink of an eye.

* Very, very, consistent! I never once saw it malfunction in the slightest. I've heard of issues with other trannies ripping gears apart or freezing up, but this is truly a shift on the fly design.

* Four speeds is probably overkill for most applications, and they weren't using four in their (very successful) robot. The two speed served them very well.

See the FIRSTwiki entry! As soon as this whitepaper goes up I plan to wiki it with a vengence (Copyright permitting, naturally). :D

Paul H
03-07-2004, 19:52
I'll ask about the whitepaper and where we got the pinion rod Tuesday at our IRI practice. I'm also going to try to get a video of the demo board shifting and put it online.

ajlapp
05-07-2004, 23:33
the pinion wire is from Mcmaster

RogerR
06-07-2004, 01:14
i read in the original post (by d. lavery) about this transmission that they used 16 DP gears. in addition, i've read (and seen) that they use pinion rod/wire. i've been looking for 16 DP pinion rod/wire for almost a year, and i was persuaded that it didn't exist, until i found out about the 33 transmission. now i'm starting to think i was mixed up. was i wrong? are ya'll using 16 DP gears?

sanddrag
06-07-2004, 01:42
i read in the original post (by d. lavery) about this transmission that they used 16 DP gears. in addition, i've read (and seen) that they use pinion rod/wire. i've been looking for 16 DP pinion rod/wire for almost a year, and i was persuaded that it didn't exist, until i found out about the 33 transmission. now i'm starting to think i was mixed up. was i wrong? are ya'll using 16 DP gears?I don't know what they are using since I've never seen it in person but McMaster does sell 16P spur gear stock. Check the bottom of this page (http://www.mcmaster.com/asp/DisplCtlgPage.asp?ReqTyp=CATALOG&CtlgPgNbr=950&CtlgEdition=&RelatedCtlgPgs=946,947,949,950,948&sesnextrep=417603156743958&ScreenWidth=1024&McMMainWidth=812&ToolsetID=ToolMultiPageNav&ToolsetAct=) Quite a limited tooth count selection though.

RogerR
06-07-2004, 11:41
...Check the bottom of this page (http://www.mcmaster.com/asp/DisplCtlgPage.asp?ReqTyp=CATALOG&CtlgPgNbr=950&CtlgEdition=&RelatedCtlgPgs=946,947,949,950,948&sesnextrep=417603156743958&ScreenWidth=1024&McMMainWidth=812&ToolsetID=ToolMultiPageNav&ToolsetAct=) Quite a limited tooth count selection though.
much appreciated. i'm suprised that i missed that, since mcmaster-carr is usually the first place i look.

Paul H
08-07-2004, 16:43
Yes, that's it, and it is, in fact, from McMaster. Just cut it down on a lathe and you're golden.

Apparently Jim has it mostly drawn in Inventor, but got sidetracked with developing a new streamlined autonomous code. I told him that there's interest here and he's going to try to post it soon.

Paul H
15-07-2004, 19:57
I have video of the transmission running/shifting. I need to get the firewire cable from my friend in order to capture and upload it.

Joshua May
15-07-2004, 20:00
I have video of the transmission running/shifting. I need to get the firewire cable from my friend in order to capture and uplead it.

Awesome, can't wait.

Paul H
15-07-2004, 22:14
Alright, well I can't post the videos just yet, here's some pictures. Nothing really new, but it shows the first through fourth gear positions.


(quick note, third gear in the picture isn't completely in gear. That's what happens when you shift when it's not moving)
http://www.freewebs.com/ddj331/Transmission.htm

SuperDave
03-08-2004, 14:03
Any news on the whitepaper? heh thanks.

Paul H
03-08-2004, 19:29
The last E-Mail I recieved on July 19th said "I'm still working on exploded assembly veiws, parts lists, detail drawings, etc." I haven't heard anything since.


He included this picture of the inventor model, though.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=2396

Joshua May
23-09-2004, 22:29
Sorry to revive this thread, but I was wondering if there are any more updates with the white paper. I'm really interested in looking at this thing more in depth, especially the programming.

ajlapp
09-12-2004, 00:41
me too, looking for a whitepaper...any eta?

Cory
09-12-2004, 00:42
me too, looking for a whitepaper...any eta?

I'm pretty sure that a whitepaper has already been posted... it may have been linked to, I seem to recall it being on an external site.

sanddrag
09-12-2004, 00:45
http://www.ndprep.org/robotics/archive.htm

Joshua May
20-12-2004, 11:07
Sorry to revive the thread (again) but are there any more updates with the programming aspect or the whitepaper?

kc8nod
20-12-2004, 17:20
Sorry to revive the thread (again) but are there any more updates with the programming aspect or the whitepaper?
As mentioned in the post just above, the whitepaper with the mechanical info is available at http://www.ndprep.org/robotics/archive.htm.

However, if the software isn't going to be posted anytime soon, could someone from team 33 answer a few general questions about it?
'frinstance: I the shifting based on RPM alone? Or is anything else taken into account? Depending on how fancy you wanted to get, I can imagine using RPM, voltage, current and the PWM setpoint to calculate the shift point.
Also, do the left and right trannies totally independant of one another?
How about hysteresis? Are there different RPM values for shifing up or down? Or is there a minimum "dwell time" in each gear?

Curious minds want to know!

p.s. fantastic job 33. It is a slick design. I expect to see many of them in competition this year.