Log in

View Full Version : 639 bot sees action in Iraq


plutonium83
26-09-2004, 10:03
In a bugeting mistake on Capitol Hill, the Pentagon accedentally bought The Red Tulip for 2 million dollars. It is now seeing action in Iraq, autonomously changing lightbulbs on Iraqi highways

Jay H 237
26-09-2004, 12:37
Well, on the down side, I'm not sure what good the lightbulbs are going to do with the current power grid issues in Iraq, but on the bright side, it looks like fundraising won't be an issue for your team anymore! :D

Kyle Love
26-09-2004, 15:09
What was the robots job? ;) haha I was just curious.

-Kyle

Sam Oldak
26-09-2004, 17:20
This reminds me of a great idea. How about a FIRST yearbook, where each robot has a picture, and a "most likely to ..." line. That might be fun.

Tom Bottiglieri
26-09-2004, 19:44
This reminds me of a great idea. How about a FIRST yearbook, where each robot has a picture, and a "most likely to ..." line. That might be fun.

"Team 195's robot, most likely to... sit in a room and never be used again, then be stripped for parts next build season"

Yan Wang
26-09-2004, 21:00
639 waaay too liberal for that to ever happen, Kev. Nice try! :)

plutonium83
26-09-2004, 22:46
Frankly, I dont care if our team is liberal or not.

n0cturnalxb
26-09-2004, 23:53
This reminds me of a great idea. How about a FIRST yearbook, where each robot has a picture, and a "most likely to ..." line. That might be fun.


Oh it definitely would :)

Team 1159's 2004 bot would be commandeering a pirate ship ;D

Jeremiah Johnson
27-09-2004, 08:39
Team 648 "most likely to... take over the world with it's hook of doom." :yikes:

Denman
27-09-2004, 08:43
Team 759 "most likely to..... drown trying to get to america with its overweight lifting arm"

plutonium83
27-09-2004, 16:41
"Team 33..... mostly likely to join the NBA ;) "

Squirrelrock
19-11-2004, 11:36
This reminds me of a great idea. How about a FIRST yearbook, where each robot has a picture, and a "most likely to ..." line. That might be fun.

Oh yeah. That'd be sweet. I'll see if 617 can start that at the Nasa/VCU regional as a fundraiser - pics are free of your robot, and the book, maybe, I don't know, $20US?

That's one eluva fundraiser! :D

telkanuru
13-12-2004, 19:59
Team 246... most likely to fall over and not work... whoops :p

Levin571
13-12-2004, 20:04
Most likely to make overly complicated robot where half the features are scraped during the first competition (a.k.a. the winch of extraordinary irritation)

telkanuru
13-12-2004, 20:13
Dude, sabre? Epee here! You have fallen to the dark side![/digression]

Gabriel
13-12-2004, 20:24
come to think of it, FIRST robots could be useful in Iraq, there are plenty of FIRST robots made up of enough 1/4" plate to armor a humvee...

Eria4044
22-01-2005, 11:39
come to think of it, FIRST robots could be useful in Iraq, there are plenty of FIRST robots made up of enough 1/4" plate to armor a humvee...

But I doubt any FIRST robot could survive a combat situation there. And if they're doing simple stuff like light bulbs then why buy them for 2 million? A soldier doesn't make that much in his entire life.

GateRunner
22-01-2005, 13:34
Spam's "SAM" has been over there since the end of competition last year. sadly, with no air threat to speak of, SAM (Surface to Air Meat) has had little to do save charge his pneumatics.
http://www.spamrobotics.com/gallery2/albums/build04/YearbookpicMED.jpg

dhitchco
25-01-2005, 14:42
From the original thread posted on 9/26/04, I now add the following thoughts:

1) Look at the original photo AGAIN (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=2507). The BIGGER tank is actually our rookie robot coming after yours (ha, ha). Oh, ok that's not part of "gracious professionalism....."

2) Since I work for a military contractor, so thoughts about what makes a FIRST robot different than a military robot:

---In the military, the robots are called UGVs (unmanned ground vehicles) and are used for cave exploration, urban combat in buildings, etc.

---In FIRST, you know exactly what the "battlefield" looks like; UGVs don't have that luxury and have to "feel" their way along uncharted territory. Glad you don't have to do that programming?

---In FIRST, you know exactly who and where your "enemy" is. Combat UGVs don't have that luxury. Anything can happen at any time.

---In FIRST, your robot can't be offensively "shot at". In a combat UGV, the vehicle has to be both offensive and defensive. Weighs a lot more than 100 lbs too.

---In FIRST, you have a predefined mission (grab & stack tetras). In a combat UGV, you may receive new instructions in real-time which changes the robot's mission

---In FIRST, nobody will be jamming your wireless radio transmission to the robot. In combat, you have to assume that you will be jammed.

---In FIRST, you have minimal feedback from the robot (feelers, touch plates, streaming video). In combat, your robot will indeed be OUT OF SIGHT all the time. Makes for a fun video gaming exercise.

Lastly, war robots and war in general is NOT fun. In FIRST, make sure you have FUN......and pray for the soldiers and robots that are fighting around the world for us.

Eria4044
25-01-2005, 17:01
So is it like the Mars rovers, where there's someone controlling them from mission control? I assume so. But do you have backup programming, and if so, what?

plutonium83
25-01-2005, 23:10
I'm pretty tired of this thread.

Zippiot
25-01-2005, 23:47
didn't we drop an emp bomb on iraq? that would permanently disable all electronics in a 200 mile range....so unless we rebuilt all of it there would be no good to light bulbs on the freeway. but considering that it is in action now i assume that the grid has been repaired.

russell
25-01-2005, 23:55
The only way you could possibly fit something with enough power to disable electronics for 200 miles into a case the size of a bomb (or the size of a plane for that matter) would be to use a nuke, and Im thinking I would have heard about that.

h0x4r
26-01-2005, 00:05
yea, take a look at this http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/publicfeature/nov03/1103ebom.html

russell
26-01-2005, 00:39
(There is, however, an effort to build a microwave weapon for controlling crowds; a person subjected to it definitely feels pain and is forced to retreat.)
That doesnt sound pleasant. Someone should call the ACLU on that one.

h0x4r
26-01-2005, 00:49
yea, maybe <.< >.> not sure, maybe some animal testing first....... o no, PETA is here, help!!!!

neways, y would they have that bot in Iraqi neways?

Eria4044
26-01-2005, 17:22
That doesnt sound pleasant. Someone should call the ACLU on that one.

The American Civil Rights Union? You mean it's in their interesets to keep riot control weapons limited to guns? That makes perfect sense. :rolleyes:

*This message is not endorsed by PETA, the ACLU, the ASPCA, the U.S. Armed Forces, or KB Toys.

Can't See Me
29-01-2005, 12:46
I can't believe you guys are actually acting like the bot is actually over in Iraq...

mtaman02
29-01-2005, 13:02
my old team did that a couple of years ago put the picture of a robot in the fore / back ground of a picture and made a contest to see who can guess where the robot is (ex. ivory tower etc...)

Eria4044
31-01-2005, 16:28
I can't believe you guys are actually acting like the bot is actually over in Iraq...

What? It's not like they used photoshop or anything. And those SPAM pictures were totally credible.

geeknerd99
15-02-2005, 18:25
Take a look at the tank's shadow. Now take a look at the robot's shadow.