[FTC]: Slow Down Max Speed!!

[JohnFogarty]

in robotC what is the code you need to put in to make your Max speed decrease?

[NickE]

Divide the input by a constant before sending the value to the motors. I'm not too familiar with FTC, but in RobotC for Vex, it would look like something like this:
motor[port1] = vexRT[Ch3] / 1.5;A better solution would probably be to re-gear the robot for the desired speed. In changing the maximum speed in code, you cannot use the maximum power of the motors.

[JohnFogarty]

We need to slow the drive motors because we are using a 4:1 ratio and it's still too fast. i want to make the joysticks max be a certain speed.

[NickE]

The code i put above would scale the input to the output. To limit it without scaling, do something like this:
if(vexRT[Ch1]>80){
motor[port1] = 80;
}else if(vexRT[Ch1]<-80){
motor[port1] = -80;
}else{
motor[port1] = vexRT[Ch1];
}

[JohnFogarty]

The code i put above would scale the input to the output. To limit it without scaling, do something like this:
if(vexRT[Ch1]>80){
motor[port1] = 80;
}else if(vexRT[Ch1]<-80){
motor[port1] = -80;
}else{
motor[port1] = vexRT[Ch1];
}
i will try and see if i can make this into FTC code thanks.

[l0jec]

i will try and see if i can make this into FTC code thanks.

I would recommend you take the scaling route (NickE's first example) as the second example will limit the output to the motor by only listening to 2/3 of the range of your analog stick (less control).
That or use a predefined speed constant with a simplified on/off control.

[JohnFogarty]

I would recommend you take the scaling route (NickE's first example) as the second example will limit the output to the motor by only listening to 2/3 of the range of your analog stick (less control).
That or use a predefined speed constant with a simplified on/off control.
do you know the FTC code for that?

[l0jec]

do you know the FTC code for that?

There are many ways to go about it, but I would create a scaling function. Here is an example with the important constants defined within the function. For best performance, I would recommend you calculate the ratio with the constants defined staticaly outside of the function (avoid calculating the ratio on each call).

int simpleScale(int joyVal) {

const int MAX_JOY_VAL = 127;
const int MAX_MOTOR_VAL = 100;
const int DEADZONE = 5;

//check for deadzone
if(abs(joyVal) < DEADZONE) {
return 0;
}

//calculate ratio based on max motor speed and max analog stick value
float ratio = (MAX_MOTOR_VAL/MAX_JOY_VAL);
//apply ratio to actual joystick value
int result = (joyVal)*ratio;
return result;

}
Note that you should adjust the MAX_MOTOR_VAL constant to whatever max power output you want. Remember that the motors go from -100 to +100, so if you leave it at 100, you get 100% of your power; setting it to 80 gives you 80% and so on.

You can call the function from your main task similar to this:
//scale output to someMotor based on joystick 1 analog stick 1 y axis
motor[someMotor] = simpleScale(joy1_y1);

If you want to turn the motors on/off with a toggle button instead, you should create an if/else set of statements in your main task to check if the on or off buttons have been pressed and set the motors to either the desired max output (on) or to zero (off).

[NickE]

Instead of using variables as in l0jec's example, you could use #define statements to reduce memory usage and potentially speed up the program execution some. With a #define statement, the compiler in RobotC will replace all instances of 'MAX_JOY_VAL', for instance, with the value defined in the statement. The robot will see the defined values and not the names for the values defined in the statements. Be sure not to use either equals signs or semicolons in these lines.

Here's the same code he posted, except with #define statments:
int simpleScale(int joyVal) {

#define MAX_JOY_VAL 127
#define MAX_MOTOR_VAL 100
#define DEADZONE 5

//check for deadzone
if(abs(joyVal) < DEADZONE) {
return 0;
}

//calculate ratio based on max motor speed and max analog stick value
float ratio = (MAX_MOTOR_VAL/MAX_JOY_VAL);
//apply ratio to actual joystick value
int result = (joyVal)*ratio;
return result;

}

[JohnFogarty]

Instead of using variables as in l0jec's example, you could use #define statements to reduce memory usage and potentially speed up the program execution some. With a #define statement, the compiler in RobotC will replace all instances of 'MAX_JOY_VAL', for instance, with the value defined in the statement. The robot will see the defined values and not the names for the values defined in the statements. Be sure not to use either equals signs or semicolons in these lines.

Here's the same code he posted, except with #define statments:
int simpleScale(int joyVal) {

#define MAX_JOY_VAL 127
#define MAX_MOTOR_VAL 100
#define DEADZONE 5

//check for deadzone
if(abs(joyVal) < DEADZONE) {
return 0;
}

//calculate ratio based on max motor speed and max analog stick value
float ratio = (MAX_MOTOR_VAL/MAX_JOY_VAL);
//apply ratio to actual joystick value
int result = (joyVal)*ratio;
return result;

}
Thanks i shall try these :D.

[l0jec]

Instead of using variables as in l0jec's example, you could use #define statements to reduce memory usage and potentially speed up the program execution some. With a #define statement, the compiler in RobotC will replace all instances of 'MAX_JOY_VAL', for instance, with the value defined in the statement. The robot will see the defined values and not the names for the values defined in the statements. Be sure not to use either equals signs or semicolons in these lines.


That is true of normal C, but ROBOTC claims that their scalar constants work like true constants and will not allocate additional memory/etc. Notice that I used the "const" keyword when defining those variables.
If we're not changing the MAX_MOTOR_VAL or MAX_JOY_VAL, then we're still wasting CPU on a floating point calculation on each call though. The ratio variable could also be pulled out of the function and made a constant if we want to be crazy with optimization.

Another more flexible option for such a method would be to take a joystick analog stick value as well as a max motor speed as arguments and calculate a custom scale on the fly. Would be useful if you want to provide multiple scales (based on max output) for different motors from a single function.