Log in

View Full Version : IRI OPR Ranking


Ed Law
19-07-2010, 09:46
Here are the OPR numbers for IRI. There is no surprise. Some very high numbers. Amazing matches. Wish we were there.

ISITME_YESITIS
19-07-2010, 14:30
You are missing the elimination matches. :ahh:

Chris is me
19-07-2010, 14:36
Only at IRI is the normal robot with the highest OPR... a backup bot! :eek:

Ed Law
20-07-2010, 01:08
You are missing the elimination matches. :ahh:

Sorry I did not include them earlier. Elimination matches are not used to calculate OPR numbers. These have to be done manually and I did not have time to do it at work.

Here is an updated speadsheet with elimination results. Most selections alligned with their OPR scores. There were 4 teams that had relatively high OPR but did not get picked: 107, 1038, 141 and 461.

dodar
20-07-2010, 01:21
1732 did get picked

Ed Law
20-07-2010, 01:34
1732 did get picked

Thanks. Corrected. It is late and I was half asleep.

vance
20-07-2010, 13:08
I can't help but wonder what the least amount of wins an alliance captain at IRI has had.

Zach O
20-07-2010, 14:09
I can't help but wonder what the least amount of wins an alliance captain at IRI has had.

Team 1058, the 8th seed alliance captain, had the least amount of wins. Their record was (3-1-4)

Basel A
20-07-2010, 14:21
Team 1058, the 8th seed alliance captain, had the least amount of wins. Their record was (3-1-4)

I believe he meant ever, but I could be wrong.

vance
20-07-2010, 14:30
I believe he meant ever, but I could be wrong.

Indeed ever. Of course I know our record was 3-1-4. I suppose number of losses is a better indicator of success.

BrendanB
20-07-2010, 14:34
Indeed ever. Of course I know our record was 3-1-4. I suppose number of losses is a better indicator of success.

I think that their record is the least number of wins since previous years it was based on wins and losses, not points, but I may be wrong from 2003 and back (a little fuzzy on the rules).

Collin Fultz
20-07-2010, 15:47
I think technically the answer would be whomever was #1 seed alliance captain in 2001, since that game was 4-0 and there weren't "winners" during qualification matches. They would have had 0 wins.

Zach O
20-07-2010, 16:24
Indeed ever. Of course I know our record was 3-1-4. I suppose number of losses is a better indicator of success.

Sorry, I thought your question was IRI specific. I thought the answer was rather easy... :P