![]() |
Team 254 2012 Robot...DONE!
Slipstream wanted another 15 minutes of fame and took a few lessons from MJ.
~EJ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2UA7...layer_embedded |
Re: Team 254 2012 Robot...DONE!
![]() |
Re: Team 254 2012 Robot...DONE!
The sad thing is, I say the title and wasn't that surprised.
|
Re: Team 254 2012 Robot...DONE!
Nice job! I do have a question for you. How far does the arm extend beyond the edge of the frame?
|
Re: Team 254 2012 Robot...DONE!
Good work. While everyone went for shooters, you thought outside of the box.
It maaaay however break this rule: Quote:
|
Re: Team 254 2012 Robot...DONE!
We're screwed. Again. :p Thanks for uploading this! Great idea!
|
Re: Team 254 2012 Robot...DONE!
Nice layup :P Did I spy Devastator in the background there...?
|
Re: Team 254 2012 Robot...DONE!
What height is the hoop you scored in at? Is it equivalent to any of the heights of the actual competition hoops?
|
Re: Team 254 2012 Robot...DONE!
Ironically a design like this would be perfectly legal for the middle level hoop and I would not be at all surprised to see it.
|
Re: Team 254 2012 Robot...DONE!
Quote:
|
Re: Team 254 2012 Robot...DONE!
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Team 254 2012 Robot...DONE!
Quote:
|
Re: Team 254 2012 Robot...DONE!
Hey, rules are rules. Can't dunk on the top hoop :rolleyes:
|
Re: Team 254 2012 Robot...DONE!
Quote:
|
Re: Team 254 2012 Robot...DONE!
Yep, Joseph is right. I think that the design committee wanted teams to actually compete and score with the spirit of Basketball in mind.
Shooting for the top would provide a better challenge than to just "dunk it in" (which is illegal and impossible to do with the fender and the 14 in extension limit, for the goals were designed not to be contacted by robots in any way NORMALLY). |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:35. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi