Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Rules/Strategy (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Appendage Question (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=100193)

Renesisking 14-01-2012 15:24

Appendage Question
 
Hi everyone,

My team and I are in a debate about this. We are thinking about a "plow" like design to herd balls into our ball conveyor system and we were planning on using two pieces interconnected so that they would be one piece. It would be deployed when necessary and would also be used as the tool to push down the bridge for us to get on. My question is, would that piece be considered as two appendages or one since its one entire piece?

nssheepster 14-01-2012 15:28

Re: Appendage Question
 
One. Since the mechanism is one, it is one thing, even though it can be used for two functions. They wouldn't complain if your shooter could also redistribute balls. They won't complain if your "plow" can hold down the bridge.

Renesisking 14-01-2012 15:33

Re: Appendage Question
 
Awesome, thank you very much!

Grim Tuesday 14-01-2012 19:45

Re: Appendage Question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Renesisking (Post 1105435)
Awesome, thank you very much!

Remember, Chief Delphi is not always right. The post above yours doesn't cite any rule, and our team can't find any that would define an appendage. We asked in Q&A about it, but until that gets answered, there is no answer.

My best guess, and what the opinion of CD has pretty much settled upon is that anything that moves as one piece is an appendage, but there is no official one as of yet.

If this has been clarified, I would appreciate it if someone would point me to the relevant rule.

Renesisking 27-01-2012 20:40

Re: Appendage Question
 
Yea, I haven't heard anything about this yet. Any updates?

nssheepster 27-01-2012 20:49

Re: Appendage Question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Grim Tuesday (Post 1105623)
Remember, Chief Delphi is not always right. The post above yours doesn't cite any rule, and our team can't find any that would define an appendage. We asked in Q&A about it, but until that gets answered, there is no answer.

My best guess, and what the opinion of CD has pretty much settled upon is that anything that moves as one piece is an appendage, but there is no official one as of yet.

If this has been clarified, I would appreciate it if someone would point me to the relevant rule.


Um, I wasn't citing a rule, just citing common sense. There is no rule against appendages having multiple uses, so there's no real issue. Unless that changes in the Q&A, or a Team Update. So far, no problems.

Siri 27-01-2012 22:57

Re: Appendage Question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nssheepster (Post 1114953)
Um, I wasn't citing a rule, just citing common sense. There is no rule against appendages having multiple uses, so there's no real issue. Unless that changes in the Q&A, or a Team Update. So far, no problems.

In fact, the Q&A does address the multiple use issue:

Q: Is there any limit to the kind or number of functions that can be performed by a single appendage as long as it only extends beyond a single edge of the frame perimeter?
A: No.


However, ruling this design legal is not just about its multiple uses. Personally, I find more potential in the phrase "two pieces interconnected so that they would be one piece". As we've been repeatedly told, "There is no formal definition of appendage, however a colloquial definition is "a subordinate part attached to something; an auxiliary part; addition" (courtesy of disctionary.com). To elaborate, an appendage, when extended beyond the Frame Perimeter, is a contiguous assembly."

I would suggest ensuring that your "two pieces" have very, very obvious contiguity.

nssheepster 28-01-2012 12:03

Re: Appendage Question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Siri (Post 1115028)
In fact, the Q&A does address the multiple use issue:

Q: Is there any limit to the kind or number of functions that can be performed by a single appendage as long as it only extends beyond a single edge of the frame perimeter?
A: No.


However, ruling this design legal is not just about its multiple uses. Personally, I find more potential in the phrase "two pieces interconnected so that they would be one piece". As we've been repeatedly told, "There is no formal definition of appendage, however a colloquial definition is "a subordinate part attached to something; an auxiliary part; addition" (courtesy of disctionary.com). To elaborate, an appendage, when extended beyond the Frame Perimeter, is a contiguous assembly."

I would suggest ensuring that your "two pieces" have very, very obvious contiguity.


Agreed. There's a thread on that http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...=100696&page=3

right there.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi