Chief Delphi - New Vision sample program

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)

- Java (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=184)

- - New Vision sample program (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=100792)

Re: New Vision sample program

I have a question regarding the sample program, given that we have an image, what's to do with it? How can I begin to translate the image into motor movement?

Re: New Vision sample program

are there javadocs for the new code?

Re: New Vision sample program

Quote:

Originally Posted by xmendude217 (Post 1112351)

I have a question regarding the sample program, given that we have an image, what's to do with it? How can I begin to translate the image into motor movement?

We base our movement off of center_mass_x_normalized.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dxk3355 (Post 1113280)

are there javadocs for the new code?

Some of the methods involved seem to not be setup for javadocs.

Re: New Vision sample program

Is there a Netbeans plugin update? So far it looks like the CriteriaCollection, which is used in the Java sample code, doesn't exist.

Re: New Vision sample program

Quote:

Originally Posted by kamehameHA (Post 1113512)

Is there a Netbeans plugin update? So far it looks like the CriteriaCollection, which is used in the Java sample code, doesn't exist.

The plugin update came at the same time as the new sample.
If your Netbeans isn't set to update every startup/day, go into the Plugins and Reload the updates page.

Re: New Vision sample program

We're doing something very similar to the sample code (thresholding, convex hull, particle analysis), and finding it takes about a second to process each image on the cRio--far too slow for automated targeting.

Has anyone else been able to get the code to work onboard, with acceptable performance?

Thanks,

Steve (software mentor for team 649)

Re: New Vision sample program

Hi,
We copied the sample code into our project and are using the sample images provided. When we run it we get zero particles found. I added some extra code to print a particle report after every image operation and find that there are particles before the final filter is run(see below).

I also had a question about the following lines:

Code:

        cc = new CriteriaCollection();

        cc.addCriteria(MeasurementType.IMAQ_MT_BOUNDING_RECT_WIDTH, 30, 400, false);

        cc.addCriteria(MeasurementType.IMAQ_MT_BOUNDING_RECT_HEIGHT, 40, 400, false);

I read through the vision concepts doc and found descriptions of these criteria. But I was not sure if it meant:
a) crop the entire image to the described rectangle and return particles in the cropped area.
b) only return particles that fit in the size of described rectangle, so search entire image for particles that fit.

Here's the code and output. I am using 10ft2.jpg in this example output. I also tried the other xxft2.jpg images and got the same result, the last filter found zero particles.

Code:

            BinaryImage bigObjectsImage = thresholdImage.removeSmallObjects(false, 2);

            printParticleReports("bigobj", bigObjectsImage);



            // fill in occluded rectangles

            BinaryImage convexHullImage = bigObjectsImage.convexHull(false);

            printParticleReports("convexhull", convexHullImage);



            // find filled in rectangles

            BinaryImage filteredImage = convexHullImage.particleFilter(cc);

            printParticleReports("filtered", filteredImage);

The output is jumbled, see this thread: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=101438

Quote:

[cRIO]
[cRIO] * bigobj******************************************** *
[cRIO] 031250000000000444 , 0.0 )
[cRIO] Area : 301746.0
[cRIO] percent : 98.224609375
[cRIO] Bounding Rect : ( 0 , 0 ) 640*480
[cRIO] Quality : 98.33023755987878
[cRIO]
[cRIO]
[cRIO] Particle(1/2)
[cRIO] Particle Report:
[cRIO] Image Height : 480
[cRIO] Image Width : 640
[cRIO] Center of mass : ( 319 , 240 )
[cRIO] normalized : ( -0.0Particle(2/2)
[cRIO] Particle Report:
[cRIO] Image Height : 480
[cRIO] Image Width : 640
[cRIO] Center of mass : ( 323 , 31 )
[cRIO] normalized : ( 0.009374999999999911 , -0.8708333333333333 )
[cRIO] Area : 272.0
[cRIO] percent : 0.08854166666666666
[cRIO] Bounding Rect : ( 294 , 29 ) 55*7
[cRIO] Quality : 95.77464788732394
[cRIO]
[cRIO]
[cRIO] 2 146.245212
[cRIO] **********************************************
[cRIO]
[cRIO] 652 )
[cRIO] Area : 307200.0
[cRIO] percent : 100.0
[cRIO] Bounding Rect : ( 0 , 0 ) 640*480
[cRIO] Quality : 100.0
[cRIO]
[cRIO]
[cRIO] Particle(1/1)
[cRIO] Particle Report:
[cRIO] Image Height : 480
[cRIO] Image Width : 640
[cRIO] Center of mass : ( 319 , 239 )
[cRIO] normalized : ( -0.0031250000000000444 , -0.004166666666666vexhull************************** *******************
[cRIO]
[cRIO] * con1 146.837495
[cRIO] **********************************************
[cRIO]
[cRIO]
[cRIO] * filtered****************************************** ***
[cRIO] 0 147.054589
[cRIO] **********************************************
[cRIO]

Re: New Vision sample program

Turns out someone had changed the low R param of the RGB filter (from 25 to 40) while switching between our green light filter and sample's red light filter. I changed it back to 25 and was able to run the sample code in our robot project and find targets. Once that worked we are guessing that the criteria lines add a filter that looks for particles that are in the size range 30,40 to 400,400.

Code:

cc.addCriteria(MeasurementType.IMAQ_MT_BOUNDING_RECT_WIDTH, 30, 400, false);

        cc.addCriteria(MeasurementType.IMAQ_MT_BOUNDING_RECT_HEIGHT, 40, 400, false);

These criteria do not crop an image. If that explanation of the bounding rect width/height is incorrect please let me know.

Re: New Vision sample program

We are a second year team that is trying at this late stage in the build cycle to do some image analysis. We have a high level question to help us visualize how to make this work. We are using Java.

Where is the best place to do the image analysis? It seems we have a couple of possibilities:
1. Send images from camera to cRio and then run the image analysis code on cRio.
2. Send images from camera to laptop and then run the image analysis code on laptop
3. Send images from camera to cRio and access the images using ftp to laptop and run image analysis on laptop

Are teams using all of these alternatives? Which one is most popular?
Recommendations?
Other alternatives we haven't thought of?
thanks
Dave Fischer - mentor
Jasper Indiana team 3559