![]() |
Bumper Rule Question
According to the bumper rule (R27) we need at least 8 inches of bumper space on each side of each exterior vertex. My question is, even if we don't have 8 inches of frame on each side of the vertex, do we just cover all the available space, or do we have to extend the frame? Please help.
|
Re: Bumper Rule Question
Start with the Team Update from 1-17:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Bumper Rule Question
Quote:
|
Re: Bumper Rule Question
Quote:
|
Re: Bumper Rule Question
Quote:
http://frc-manual.usfirst.org/TeamUpdates/0#term 86 |
Re: Bumper Rule Question
To clarify our question: In the front and back of our robot, there is an opening for the balls to go through. On each side of the opening, the frame of our robot is only 6.25 inches. Our question is if we don't have 8 inches of robot to cover, do we just build our bumpers to fit what we have?
|
Re: Bumper Rule Question
Quote:
You build the bumpers 8" long and rebuild the frame to support them as required by [R33]. Bumpers measuring less than 8" from the vertices of the frame perimeter are grounds for not passing inspection. |
Re: Bumper Rule Question
To make it even clearer: You MUST have 8" of frame, 6.25 inches is 1.75 inches too short.
|
Re: Bumper Rule Question
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Bumper Rule Question
Perhaps it is easier to answer that all bumper rules must be satisfied. That is, 8" on either side of an exterior vetrtices, and supported at the ends, and no gaps in the frame larger than 8", and small gaps of less than 1/4" are allowed when those gaps are generated by hardware, welds, or frame joiners, etc.
|
Re: Bumper Rule Question
Quote:
Wouldn't that be impossible though, at least for two of the bumpers? Doesn't the wood have to overlap the wood of the perpendicular bumper? How would the end be rigidly attached to the Frame Perimeter then? Or is 'end' a relative term, and just means 'as close to the end as possible'? I have an example picture below: ![]() Thanks in advance. ::rtm:: |
Re: Bumper Rule Question
Ryan,
The picture shown is a new, allowable corner defined by the GDC this year. The thought being that one bumper gives support to the other and teams who wish to design one piece bumpers can take advantage of this new ruling to strengthen the corners. |
Re: Bumper Rule Question
Quote:
![]() |
Re: Bumper Rule Question
I have one question regarding what Mr. Skierkiewicz wrote. Specifically, he said there cannot be a gap in the frame of more than 8". I didn't read that proviso in the rules. Does this mean we cannot have more than an 8" segment cut out of the frame or does he mean that the bumper cannot cover more than an 8" cut out in the frame? Put another way, can you remove more than an 8" segment of frame perimeter, provided that there is at least eight inches on either side of that opening or are you limited to an 8" maximum opening?
|
Re: Bumper Rule Question
Quote:
Bumpers must be supported by the structure/frame of the Robot (i.e. each end of the Bumper must be rigidly attached to the Frame Perimeter, the gap between the backing material and the frame must not be greater than ¼ in. and no section of Bumper greater than 8 in. may be unsupported). See Figure 4?7. Al forgot to specify that that gap was behind the bumper. You can remove more than 8" of frame perimeter, provided that you do not try to mount bumper across the gap, and provided that you leave the required bumper areas at the corners fully supported. |
Re: Bumper Rule Question
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:54. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi