![]() |
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Quote:
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
This design is amazing. I can only imagine all of the details that need to be attended to for this to work as a ramp, as a robot that balances on the end, and as a gathering + shooting robot. So many constraints to satisfy on one robot! It makes me happy to see a really cool design like this.
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Quote:
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
I can't believe how many people are surprised at a robot like this - I expected it.
Its just like 148's Tumbleweed in 2008 where its going to show its true colors in the elimination matches and be the pick of a lifetime for any alliance who can hold their own with their first two robots. Not only that, but a robot that can pretty much guarantee that an opposing alliance robot can get on the ramp with them will probably earn them the top seed anyway. Great design. I just hope that this will be the new start of a wave of simple robot designs for all teams in the years to come. |
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
if you couldn't see this thing and someone explained that only a 6"x20something" piece of it was in contact with only the top of the bridge, would you think it was legal?
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Quote:
It was a direct port from badcaps.net forums where I am a super-mod... the forum needed a dead horse smiley. I wouldn't consider it overly graphic... yeah, there is a whip and there is some red flecks but honestly? |
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Wow. :ahh: The design is so simple yet elegant! and the purpose makes a lot of sense.
I can't wait to see this thing in action! |
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Great job! My team is working on a different/similar design because we were doing a holding mechanism that was similar but powered by motors and had no ramp so we have a higher notch shooter.
I also did some pixel calculations using paint and this is my find (roughly): wheels = 104 pixels sooo, 1 inch = 17.33 pixels 14 inches= 242.67 pixels Past the frame perimeter: extends = 237 pixels sooo, final extends = ~~13.67 inches, seems good to me. also in the picture with the ramp set up, was that 22 degrees. I calculated about 27 degrees (probably just a calculation error, unless the picture was before a mod that allowed it to be only 22 degrees). |
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Quote:
I'm thinking like 469 (2010), this robot, 71 (2002), 148 (2008). I think teams forget that in order to be successful with one of these specialized designs, you have to have major good engineering, tweaking, and testing going on. |
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Quote:
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
First of all I want to congratulate on such a great design and execution . When I posted the link in our team's forum I added caption to the effect 'this is what I would call a power play (a play that executed correctly will almost guarantee whining a match)'
I am wondering how this ramp design will change the value of wide vs. narrow chassis in alliance selections. Many teams chose wide chassis because it may aid in a) balancing 3 bots, and b) with size of ball intake. This design takes away the value of the wide bots for balancing. As a matter of fact , wide bots would have harder time aligning with and climbing your ramp. Good luck. I hope the rules are interpreted in your favor . |
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Quote:
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Quote:
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Quote:
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:01. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi