Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Forced needed to get on Bridge (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=102047)

ArmandoSal 05-02-2012 17:23

Forced needed to get on Bridge
 
Hello, I am just wondering if anyone has found out the force needed to tilt the Bridge so that a robot can get on it. Thanks.

bladetech932 05-02-2012 17:32

Re: Forced needed to get on Bridge
 
This was posted in another thread i saw a while back as 16 to 18 lbs of force on the most outer part of the bridge. I am not sure of these measurements however, Could someone confirm this?

Djur 05-02-2012 20:02

Re: Forced needed to get on Bridge
 
The weight of 2 batteries at halfway is needed to tip, so ~1 battery's worth is needed at the edge. That's about 13 pounds, so design for 20 lbs to be on the safe side.

slijin 05-02-2012 20:18

Re: Forced needed to get on Bridge
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bladetech932 (Post 1120545)
This was posted in another thread i saw a while back as 16 to 18 lbs of force on the most outer part of the bridge. I am not sure of these measurements however, Could someone confirm this?

That's about right. To clarify, it takes ~59 lbf-ft of torque to tip the bridge.

bladetech932 05-02-2012 21:44

Re: Forced needed to get on Bridge
 
for teams that have matched their bridge to the specs of competition. how did you adjust the balance of your bridge? did anyone recreate the 16-18 lbs on both sides while keeping the bridge balanced? any info would be greatly appreciated.

Alan Anderson 05-02-2012 21:54

Re: Forced needed to get on Bridge
 
With an extra 160 pounds of concrete blocks mounted underneath the deck, our wooden bridge now passes the "two battery" test.

jdunston94 05-02-2012 22:01

Re: Forced needed to get on Bridge
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Anderson (Post 1120705)
With an extra 160 pounds of concrete blocks mounted underneath the deck, our wooden bridge now passes the "two battery" test.

instead of putting aton of uneeded weight on the underside of the bridge we just put surgical tubing


and it is right around 18lbs of force perpendicular to the bridge to push it down

bladetech932 05-02-2012 22:18

Re: Forced needed to get on Bridge
 
Quote:

instead of putting aton of uneeded weight on the underside of the bridge we just put surgical tubing
How did you attach the tubing?

mesamb1 05-02-2012 23:56

Re: Forced needed to get on Bridge
 
We took eye hooks and screwed them into the bottom of the bridge. Then we adjusted the tubing till it met the specs.

bladetech932 06-02-2012 00:10

Re: Forced needed to get on Bridge
 
alright thanks. i will try that on monday

Siri 06-02-2012 10:53

Re: Forced needed to get on Bridge
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jdunston94 (Post 1120714)
instead of putting aton of uneeded weight on the underside of the bridge we just put surgical tubing


and it is right around 18lbs of force perpendicular to the bridge to push it down

This will not actually yield the competition bridge dynamics. How much it is off will be situation-dependent. In short though, you're now using spring force (F=-kx) rather than distributed bass to balance the moments. This means that, while you may pass the battery test, as your bridge moves, the moment caused by the spring force will not fully mimic what the simply heavier competition bridge would do. It probably won't affect your bridge lowering tests, but if you're practicing (much less autonomously programming) balancing on it, don't count on the results being the same unless you've tested it.

bladetech932 06-02-2012 15:17

Re: Forced needed to get on Bridge
 
Quote:

We took eye hooks and screwed them into the bottom of the bridge. Then we adjusted the tubing till it met the specs.
could anyone who has done this post a picture of the bridge with the surgical tubing set-up?

Dale 11-02-2012 16:02

Re: Forced needed to get on Bridge
 
1 Attachment(s)
Our bridge now meets the balance test with a bunch of old dead FRC batteries. It took ten batteries , five per side, to meet the 2012 battery test. See the attached photo. The center of the first 2x4 is 16" back from the edge of the bridge. There's plywood over the top of all the batteries when it's put together.

dcreed@epic.com 22-02-2012 10:29

Re: Forced needed to get on Bridge
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by slijin (Post 1120647)
That's about right. To clarify, it takes ~59 lbf-ft of torque to tip the bridge.



I'm confused... some people are saying 16-19lbs of force at the end of the bridge and then someonw say the ~59 lbf-ft of torque to tip the brige.. so say if using a window van motor with 25.8 ft-lbf applied to the end of the bridge? Would this tip the bridge or not?

Thanks,
Dan

Alan Anderson 22-02-2012 11:35

Re: Forced needed to get on Bridge
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dcreed@epic.com (Post 1132490)
I'm confused... some people are saying 16-19lbs of force at the end of the bridge and then someonw say the ~59 lbf-ft of torque to tip the brige..

Where's the confusion? The end of the bridge is about 40-48 inches from the hinge point, depending on which end, so 59 lb-ft of torque would be between 15 and 17.5 pounds.

Quote:

so say if using a window van motor with 25.8 ft-lbf applied to the end of the bridge? Would this tip the bridge or not?
How much force are you applying to the end of the bridge? A one-foot-long direct-driven rod perpendicular to the motor shaft could work. A two-foot-long rod would not.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:39.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi