Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Robot Showcase (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   Team 166 2012 Robot (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=102789)

klmx30302 14-02-2012 10:48

Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Our robot is 99% done so I thought I would post a couple of pictures:





It is just waiting on software and a minor modification to the bridge manipulator.

More to come later today.

Hallry 14-02-2012 11:32

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Looks great, what point baskets can it score on?

mlantry 14-02-2012 11:34

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
is that surgical tubing or something else on your elevator/ ball lifter.

one4robots 14-02-2012 11:40

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
It looks like polycord on the ball lifter. Is that correct?

klmx30302 14-02-2012 12:13

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mlantry (Post 1126397)
is that surgical tubing or something else on your elevator/ ball lifter.

Quote:

Originally Posted by one4robots (Post 1126400)
It looks like polycord on the ball lifter. Is that correct?

We are using 4 strands of polycord on the ball lifter and 5 entrapption stars at the bottom. Here is a test video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEJdL5qK4KI
Since that video was recorded we have added 2 lexan plates at the bottom to center the ball when it gets to the polycord.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hallry (Post 1126396)
Looks great, what point baskets can it score on?

When the software is tweaked and tested we should be able to get 3 pointers from the middle of the field or farther.

klmx30302 15-02-2012 20:58

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Yet another photo!:


And a 8 minute long video of low power shooter testing!:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7Ww1HwYT0Q

We really wanted to see just how far we can shoot balls, but we were limited due to the 12.5 foot ceiling in our cafetorium.

Rogue Leader 15-02-2012 21:08

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Wow! It looks very nice! I'm curious about your shooting mechanism though. Is it a turret design utilizing the Lazy Susan? Or is it fixed? (The first picture would make it look misleading) If it is a Lazy Susan, I'm even more curious as to how you feed the balls in. Either way, great looking 'bot! :cool:

klmx30302 15-02-2012 21:19

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue Leader (Post 1127663)
Wow! It looks very nice! I'm curious about your shooting mechanism though. Is it a turret design utilizing the Lazy Susan? Or is it fixed? (The first picture would make it look misleading) If it is a Lazy Susan, I'm even more curious as to how you feed the balls in. Either way, great looking 'bot! :cool:



This may clear that up a bit, we hold the shooter with wheels in the front, and a axel in the back, we rotate the turret with a lead-screw.

What will be interesting is that our team *may* be participating in our school pep rally on friday, which may or may not involve trying to shoot balls into one of the hoops in the gym...

Drivencrazy 15-02-2012 21:40

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
So it looks like the balls roll down those two rectangular pieces from the collector to the shooter. Am I right? Looks pretty sweet and good luck in the pep rally! They are a great way to get some exposure in your school and get some kids interested in robotics.

KrazyCarl92 15-02-2012 21:40

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Multiple cameras? (One for the shooter presumably, and then one above the intake?)

Care to elaborate on the functionality, purpose, design implications with TWO cameras???

klmx30302 15-02-2012 22:00

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KrazyCarl92 (Post 1127690)
Multiple cameras? (One for the shooter presumably, and then one above the intake?)

Care to elaborate on the functionality, purpose, design implications with TWO cameras???

The camera near the shooter is used to lock the shooter onto a hoop and automatically adjust the motor speed so all that the drive team has to do is press the "fire" button.

The 2nd camera (the one near the intake) is primarily used to aid drivers with ball collection, but it could possibly be used to automatically lock onto a ball and pick it up (we have a ball recognizing algorithm written but it isnt in any current code on the robot).

Nick Bouressa 15-02-2012 22:04

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue Leader (Post 1127663)
Wow! It looks very nice! I'm curious about your shooting mechanism though. Is it a turret design utilizing the Lazy Susan? Or is it fixed? (The first picture would make it look misleading) If it is a Lazy Susan, I'm even more curious as to how you feed the balls in. Either way, great looking 'bot! :cool:

Hello! The turret is rotated by a lead screw driven by the AndyMark motor beneath the shooter. And on the shooter assembly there is a slider with the plastic lead screw connector thing (technical name of course) mounted on a pivot, which compensates for the arc when the shooter rotates. We had thought about using a Lazy Susan, but this design seemed to fit better and weigh less.

Its kind of hard to see from the pictures, but the shooter pivots on a rod that is blocked in every picture by the vertical support beam on the shooter, or the balls.

EDIT: To elaborate on the pep rally, we *are* participating in it and will try to score in a basket. Which will be great exposure to allot of people in or school, teachers and students alike. In other years we have talked about the team before, but its never been during build season before so we never had the robot to show off.

klmx30302 17-02-2012 12:13

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
The robot is finished!!! Final Weight 119Lb
More Pictures!:





And 3 videos of us testing a little of everything:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWNNDdnIVgk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGEjrogrRSI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B97aowiqFbg

Later I will have video from us at the school pep rally and from 151's reveal event tonight.

Pep rally video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kYG7VGNId8

johnr 17-02-2012 16:17

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
I was just wondering if you are concerned about the bridge manipulator blocking/separating your team number?

Nick Bouressa 17-02-2012 20:20

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnr (Post 1128941)
I was just wondering if you are concerned about the bridge manipulator blocking/separating your team number?

Hrrm..... We haven't really thought about that before, however because that part will only be in its lowered position for a short amount of time, I don't think we need to be concerned about splitting the number. If that part were stay down for a large part o the match, I would be concerned about it covering the numbers.

Nate Laverdure 17-02-2012 20:23

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick Bouressa (Post 1129080)
Hrrm..... We haven't really thought about that before, however because that part will only be in its lowered position for a short amount of time, I don't think we need to be concerned about splitting the number. If that part were stay down for a large part o the match, I would be concerned about it covering the numbers.

If you were worried, you could replace the pointy bit with clear polycarbonate. Robot looks awesome-- great job!

klmx30302 17-02-2012 21:58

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Were back from reveal and we finally got some video of our shooter operating in a room with a high ceiling: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxjSHXYgjiQ

But, In this video the shooter is limited to 6 volts by software, the only thing I know is that it is spinning at or below 4000 rpm.

Alex.q 17-02-2012 23:05

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
I like the robot, well done. However, doesn't the two part mechanism for putting down the bridge violate the single appendage rule? I might not be seeing it, but it doesn't appear to be one contiguous appendage outside the frame. If this indeed is the case, a quick fix might be just to tie a cable/string from one side to the other so that they are "contiguous".

klmx30302 18-02-2012 06:34

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex.q (Post 1129194)
I like the robot, well done. However, doesn't the two part mechanism for putting down the bridge violate the single appendage rule? I might not be seeing it, but it doesn't appear to be one contiguous appendage outside the frame. If this indeed is the case, a quick fix might be just to tie a cable/string from one side to the other so that they are "contiguous".

We have a piece of threaded rod connecting the two sides when it is outside the frame perimeter.

klmx30302 23-02-2012 12:13

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Ok, now that the robot is done here is pictures of it all put together:





Final weight: 118.8 Pounds

More picures in this web album:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1080665...eat=directlink

Chef Jeff 23-02-2012 12:51

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by klmx30302 (Post 1126379)
Our robot is 99% done so I thought I would post a couple of pictures:





It is just waiting on software and a minor modification to the bridge manipulator.

More to come later today.

Hey 166 Great job good luck this year , had a great time hanging out with your team last year in Vegas .

Nick Bouressa 23-02-2012 21:24

Re: Team 166 2012 Robot
 
Thanks again for the great time in Vegas last year. Vegas was amazing! (We even got to stay longer because our flight was cancelled!)
Good luck this year!!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:47.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi