Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=102873)

Al Skierkiewicz 06-03-2012 19:14

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Martin,
You have pointed out a common mistake when checking the rules. In the case of the Q&A the answer is referring to the bumper. Another part of the rules say that the bumper must be fully supported by robot frame.

[R33]
Bumpers must be supported by the structure/frame of the Robot (i.e. each end of the Bumper must be rigidly attached
to the Frame Perimeter, the gap between the backing material and the frame must not be greater than ¼ in. and no
section of Bumper greater than 8 in. may be unsupported). See Figure 4-7.

It is for this reason, I always add..."all bumper rules must be satisfied".

Joe Ross 06-03-2012 22:59

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GaryVoshol (Post 1139961)
The most common method of "erasing" the 5th bumper number is to put tape over it. So they exchange one rules violation for another. Is that what we really want?

Allowable bumper materials are plywood, noodles, fabric, fasteners and optional angle reinforcements. Nothing else.

Do you also believe that paint, sharpie ink, and embroidery thread are illegal since they aren't on that list?

Alan Anderson 06-03-2012 23:41

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Ross (Post 1140461)
Do you also believe that paint, sharpie ink, and embroidery thread are illegal since they aren't on that list?

<R35> says team numbers must be displayed on the Bumper. It doesn't quite say the markings are considered part of the Bumper, though that much word-warping is probably silly. I'll just say that I believe the markings are not part of the Bumper construction.

martin417 07-03-2012 12:13

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz (Post 1140360)
Martin,
You have pointed out a common mistake when checking the rules. In the case of the Q&A the answer is referring to the bumper. Another part of the rules say that the bumper must be fully supported by robot frame.

[R33]
Bumpers must be supported by the structure/frame of the Robot (i.e. each end of the Bumper must be rigidly attached
to the Frame Perimeter, the gap between the backing material and the frame must not be greater than ¼ in. and no
section of Bumper greater than 8 in. may be unsupported). See Figure 4-7.

It is for this reason, I always add..."all bumper rules must be satisfied".

Which brings up one of my gripes about the way the GDC answers Q&A. The question was asked clearly. They could have answered the question in a way that actually answered the question and removed all ambiguity. Instead, they answered the question in a way that caused at least one person (me) to re-interpret the rules incorrectly. I understand that they don't want to analyze designs in the Q&A, but they answered the very same question very clearly in the team update from yesterday. Why not do that during the build season?

Al Skierkiewicz 07-03-2012 14:23

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Martin,
You are not the only one who has complained about the answers. Although this may be of little comfort, please remember that for every question answered the GDC spends a great deal of time discussing the ramifications. It is not a perfect system but it is the only one we have right now. I will pass your message along when I can.

Gary Dillard 13-03-2012 08:11

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Hey Al, I just got a note that says I have to take a test in order to be an inspector. Apparently my good looks and quick wit aren't enough to qualify this year.

Al Skierkiewicz 13-03-2012 08:30

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Gary,
I wrote the test especially for you! No cheating now.

Jim Wilks 13-03-2012 09:34

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
The test seemed too easy to me.

The completion certificate with last years' Logomotion graphic on it made me laugh.

Al Skierkiewicz 13-03-2012 10:26

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
OK,
Time for the list after week 2 and you shouldn't be surprised.

The overwhelming biggest problem for two weeks running is bumpers. Every regional LRI has reported large numbers (up to 50% of teams) have some issue with bumpers. Please get the word out to Week 3 regional events and teams that split numbers are not allowed under any circumstances. You can whine, moan and yell but you cannot get us to change our minds. Split numbers will not pass inspection. We are working for the GDC here guys and they have spoken. Please see Team UPDATE - 2012-03-06. This includes full numbers on both sides of an opening. Only one set per 90 degree interval and only four sets total.
Bumpers must be a minimum of 8" length on either side of an exterior vertex and must be fully supported by the frame of the robot. This mean that the bumper may not overhang the frame to satisfy the 8" length rule. Believe me, teams all over the world are managing to get four digit team numbers in the space of an 8" bumper and make them readable. This is a no brainer. Just do it.
Legal motors do not include Globe motors. Several teams at almost every event have shown up with these motors. The AndyMark gear motor is a great substitute for this motor. Painting the motor to try and hide it's identity is also not cool. If we can't identify the motor, you will need to replace it with something we can check against the checklist.
While shooters have not been a real issue so far, we do check for the safety of rotating mechanisms and energy storage from springs and surgical tubing. We want everyone to be safe, especially those on the field like potential sponsors, refs and field resetters.
If you want to make changes to your robot during a competition, please see your LRI prior to making the change. They have the experience to give you advice and counsel you on the legality of your change. When you make a change to your robot, any change, you must request reinspection. There are several rules that cover this and the repercussions are severe in some cases. All teams are subject to a finals inspection prior to eliminations rounds. Most events ask you to come to the inspection area following your last qualifying match to be reweighed with bumpers on and battery out. If your weight matches you first inspection weight, you will usually be passed. If we see something different or your weight is different, you will have to explain what changes you made and show them to inspectors. We can perform random full reinspections at any time during the event including during the finals inspection process.
We want everyone to play but we are expected to hold everyone to the rules.

JB987 13-03-2012 11:38

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Is it fair to say that removal of a fabricated component that is broken or not working as designed is a change that doesn't require re-inspection as long as it isn't a required electrical or pneumatic component or one that results in a potential safety hazard? For example, what if a team decides to remove a broken bridge lowering component?

IndySam 13-03-2012 11:44

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
It's always a good idea to inform the LRI when you make any change.

In the case of removal of an item, getting yourself re-weighed will save troubles at elimination inspection time.

Gary Dillard 13-03-2012 11:48

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
I think that the problem with the numbers on the bumpers has to do with being engineers and liking symmetry. You can walk down our street and tell which houses have engineers living there - every shrub and flower bed is nice and symmetrical. Looking at a robot with 4 numerals crammed on one side and nothing on the other side is equivalent to scraping your nails on a chalkboard to an engineer. So here's how we solved it; for offseason demos we like to put half red bumpers and half blue bumpers on - it gives a little color flair. We put the team number on the left front red bumper and the right front blue bumper. We "tolerate" the competition time when we're asymmetrical and we meet the rules, then the entire rest of the year we can be content.

Al Skierkiewicz 13-03-2012 12:49

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Joe,
When you remove a damaged component with the intention of repairing or replacing ASAP then you are repairing your robot and do not need inspection. When you remove an arm or shooter or ramp, with no intention of returning it to the robot, then you are modifying your design. The inspection process is fairly simple for that. An inspector may note that you have removed something large so that when you come in for finals, we will expect a weight change. Some events may ask you to reweigh immediately so they can note the change.
However, if you have a wheeled shooter and pneumatic shooter, for instance, and would like to change from one to the other, robot rules require that both be weighed with the robot at the time of your first inspection.
[R03]
The Robot weight may not exceed 120 lbs. When determining weight, the basic Robot structure and all elements of all
additional Mechanisms that might be used in different configurations of the Robot shall be weighed together.

Jon Stratis 13-03-2012 12:57

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JB987 (Post 1143535)
Is it fair to say that removal of a fabricated component that is broken or not working as designed is a change that doesn't require re-inspection as long as it isn't a required electrical or pneumatic component or one that results in a potential safety hazard? For example, what if a team decides to remove a broken bridge lowering component?

Even with removal of a component, inspectors still want to take a look at the change. Many times removing a component will leave sharp or jagged edges or holes that could present a safety issue, or pose possible damage to the field, game pieces, or other robots. These types of re-inspection take only a couple of minutes, and will save you hassle Saturday when you get re-weighed for eliminations!

Jaxom 13-03-2012 13:21

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jgw (Post 1143466)
The test seemed too easy to me.

The completion certificate with last years' Logomotion graphic on it made me laugh.

Wait a minute! They told us on the FRC forums several weeks ago that had been fixed, after I mentioned it. Just consider it a collector's item. ;)

Cal578 13-03-2012 22:24

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz (Post 1143496)
...Painting the motor to try and hide it's identity is also not cool...

Did that really happen, Al? It's understandable if someone innocently tries to use a motor they didn't realize was illegal. But painting a motor looks deliberate, and it's extremely disappointing that someone would knowingly break the rules and attempt to hide. That's just cheating, and there's no GP in that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz (Post 1143496)
...They [robot inspectors] have the experience to give you advice and counsel you...

Our inspector at FLR was great, made the robot inspection a very positive experience for the students. And the LRI was awesomely helpful. He went out of his way to help us improve our firmware (2 cameras causing a bit of lag, he showed us how to set the frame rate in the software instead of manually). My hat is off to the inspectors, and the great job they do. I hope Buckeye goes so well.

pfreivald 13-03-2012 22:48

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cal578 (Post 1143854)
Our inspector at FLR was great, made the robot inspection a very positive experience for the students. And the LRI was awesomely helpful. He went out of his way to help us improve our firmware (2 cameras causing a bit of lag, he showed us how to set the frame rate in the software instead of manually). My hat is off to the inspectors, and the great job they do. I hope Buckeye goes so well.

The inspection team at FLR is awesome; they're a model for what inspection teams should be!

Grim Tuesday 13-03-2012 23:39

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pfreivald (Post 1143871)
The inspection team at FLR is awesome; they're a model for what inspection teams should be!

We couldn't agree more. Rob, the LRI there was incredibly helpful to our team in inspecting our Kinect setup, as well as being an all around awesome person. The whole Inspection team was nothing but helpful, performing the pre-inspection to make sure that everyone got through the process as quickly as possible. Furthermore, when we found out that our bumpers were illegal (Someone cut the pool noodles an inch too short, so they didn't cover the ends), they were wonderful about the whole thing. The worst part is, the Inspectors never get the recognition they deserve: Refs and Field personnel always get seen and applauded by the crowd, as well as Refs sometimes joining the line of Judges high fiving people. Inspectors should be atleast bumped up to that level of prestige, if not higher.

Wayne Doenges 14-03-2012 07:49

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz
...Painting the motor to try and hide it's identity is also not cool...

This team broke several rules:
1) Using an illegal motor
2) Q. Does painting a motor violate rule R49?
A. Painting is not listed as an exception to modifying motors in Rule [R49], so it is not allowed.

Al Skierkiewicz 14-03-2012 15:05

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Thanks for the great comments on the FLR inspection team. I will pass along your comments. They really made me smile and I am sure Tom will be happy as well.
I have had teams paint legal and illegal parts, batteries, just about anything all in the process to make the robot look nice. Painting or removing the finish on motors are both illegal modifications. Yes it happens, most of us are experienced enough to notice. Someday LRIs may have a an option of taking team members around with us to see some of the reasons that inspections are needed. The majority of issues are really simple mistakes, not reading all the rules, or flaws in memory from years past. But yes, Virginia, there are problems, every event.

Peck 14-03-2012 21:39

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz (Post 1144191)
Someday LRIs may have a an option of taking team members around with us to see some of the reasons that inspections are needed.

Well, one option might be placing images of stupid mistakes others have made where people line up for inspection or on-line.

Tristan Lall 15-03-2012 04:56

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wayne Doenges (Post 1143993)
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz
...Painting the motor to try and hide it's identity is also not cool...

This team broke several rules:
1) Using an illegal motor
2) Q. Does painting a motor violate rule R49?
A. Painting is not listed as an exception to modifying motors in Rule [R49], so it is not allowed.

I would actually rule another way on this, instead of relying on that Q&A. It's the inspector's prerogative to require verification—and if the identifying features of the motor (most notably the serial number) are obscured by paint, the team won't be able to satisfy the inspector. I avoid that Q&A, because there's a flip side to this: what about other kinds of paint that don't exist for the purpose of cheating?

Some years, labelling mostly-unmodifiable parts with paint is allowed. Other years, it's apparently not.1

(This is an implication that verges on the absurd, and I'd be very tempted to take a step down the slippery slope of ignoring absurd rules, in order to bypass this potential issue. What inspector has any desire to cause a team to become irate over illegality of the paint marker they used to label a motor? I actually find myself wishing that FIRST had contradicted itself, or made another statement to the contrary, so that inspectors could instead premise their decision on a negligent misrepresentation or the likelihood of misunderstanding.)

1 I really wish FIRST would think harder about what it means to modify something. This has come up many times before. (And what about ink and tape?)

Al Skierkiewicz 15-03-2012 09:08

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Peck,
There is not enough room for all of those in just one year. We discuss them on the LRI phone conference so we can get an idea if a trend is forming.

ianschofield 15-03-2012 11:14

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Hi All
Have been reading this thread with great interest as a rooky inspector at the Toronto west reg,
Have taken the test got my certificate but not received any further info from first yet. But looking forward to the event I was there last year as a team mentor and had a blast. So can we rookies get some advice from the old hands?

Al Skierkiewicz 15-03-2012 12:37

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Ian,
I suggest you get in touch with your LRI. They should have a variety of info that can be of use. Please look over the Inspection Checklist. It is laid out so that all you have to do is go through and check each item in turn. The motor section has everything listed that is a legal motor. Talk with students and have them lead you through the process. They want to show off so let them. When anything is in doubt or when an issue arises that confounds everyone, please check back with the LRI. If he can't answer, he has a variety of other people to turn to for info, including the Head Ref, FTA, Chief Robot Inspector and everyone above them if need be. One thing to remember since this happens all the time...Never accept when the team tells you an item passed at another regional. Your regional is the only one that counts.

Doc Wu 16-03-2012 23:56

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianschofield (Post 1144571)
Hi All
Have been reading this thread with great interest as a rooky inspector at the Toronto west reg,
Have taken the test got my certificate but not received any further info from first yet. But looking forward to the event I was there last year as a team mentor and had a blast. So can we rookies get some advice from the old hands?

Inspectors work in a number of areas. When you get to your regional your LRI may assign you to a particular area, like weighing/measuring, or pair you up with an experienced inspector to get the hang of it.

Remember, there is no shame in saying you don't know the answer to a certain issue. You can always go back and ask the LRI to clarify any issue on a particular robot. Teams will appreciate your double-checking something you are not sure of instead of making an off-the-cuff decision.

Make sure the teams know you are there to help them pass inspection and offer suggestions whenever possible how to make things legal.

This is my second year as a Robot Inspector and it's been very rewarding working with teams in the pits.

sandiegodan 20-03-2012 02:24

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
1 Attachment(s)
I made this quick gage for inspection out of 3/16" plywood. After inspecting in San Diego and fumbling with a tape measure and frequently finding the bumper gage missing from the inspection area, I thought it would make some of the common measurements quicker to check. I made two of them and brought them to Los Angeles and it seemed to saved some time. Interested in any improvements to help with simple checks.

The key dimensions are:
5" wide for legal bumper width
14" long for maximum appendage extension
2" for minimum bumper height
10" for maximum bumper height
8" for minimum bumper coverage at vertices

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/at...d=13322241 18

I'm scheduled to inspect in Central Valley and at Championships so I should get some good use out of these. Easy to make if anyone sees the benefit.

Peck 23-03-2012 01:11

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sandiegodan (Post 1146552)
I made this quick gage for inspection out of 3/16" plywood. After inspecting in San Diego and fumbling with a tape measure and frequently finding the bumper gage missing from the inspection area, I thought it would make some of the common measurements quicker to check. I made two of them and brought them to Los Angeles and it seemed to saved some time. Interested in any improvements to help with simple checks.

The key dimensions are:
5" wide for legal bumper width
14" long for maximum appendage extension
2" for minimum bumper height
10" for maximum bumper height
8" for minimum bumper coverage at vertices

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/at...d=13322241 18

I'm scheduled to inspect in Central Valley and at Championships so I should get some good use out of these. Easy to make if anyone sees the benefit.

what is the depth of the cutout and why was it chosen. (my gut say it is the depth of legal bumpers but I want to be sure)

Al Skierkiewicz 09-04-2012 10:01

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
OK,
It's been a wild season so this is my list before Champs. I am sure some of you that are coming to Champs know that something on your robot isn't quite right, was missed by an inspector, or simply you changed and didn't get reinspected. Well, the time has come to make that part compliant with the rules prior to inspection at Champs. So everyone knows, here are some of the things we will be doing, checking for and insuring you correct before match play...

1. All teams must ship their bagged robot in a crate. The first thing you will need to do is open the crate and remove the bagged robot. Have your B&T form ready when crate is opened. We will have inspectors standing by to check your B&T docs and get you signed off as soon as possible. Do not open the bag until released to do so. B&T rules are still in effect.
2. Bumpers have been an issue all season and will be checked again in St. Louis. 8" minimum length for hard parts on either side of an exterior vertex, fully supported by robot frame, with team numbers in only four locations, with no split numbers.
3. While bolt heads, welds and other fasteners can protrude from the frame perimeter, the entire robot including these protrusions still must fit inside the sizing box.
4. If your robot uses any of the ARA motors, be prepared to show documentation.
5. Globe motors are not allowed. You will need to remove them from your robot and replace as needed with a legal motor, i.e. an AndyMark gearmotor, window motor or van door motor, etc.
6. Correct wire size/breaker choice will be checked.
7. As to pneumatics, only an FRC legal compressor may be used to pressurize the robot. The one and only one, legal compressor may not exceed nominal 12V, 1.05 cfm flow rate, it must be controlled by the Crio, powered from the robot battery, filling storage on the robot at either 120 psi or 60 psi (if an off-board compressor option is chosen you may choose to only store 60 psi and save the weight of the regulator).
8. All firmware must be up to date i.e. cRIO image (v43) and DS software Rev 11.30.11.00 or newer and Jag CAN firmware at 99.
9. We will be using Inspection checklist Rev C which follows the Robot Rules Rev B for this event. I encourage all teams to go over the checklist before arriving in St. Louis (read that as today, please).
10. While we hear "but it passed in XXXX" every year, the inspectors have been trained to selectively eliminate that from their hearing database. This is the big show and everything must be tip top!

If you qualified over the weekend and/or are planning a trip to Champs and/or if you were an inspector this year, please sign up for inspecting at Champs in the VIMS Championship section. I need at least 20 more inspectors for Wednesday afternoon/evening and Thursday morning. Thanks to all who have signed up already. This is going to be the biggest Championship ever.

DonRotolo 10-04-2012 21:39

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz (Post 1155814)
7. As to pneumatics, only an FRC legal compressor may be used to pressurize the robot. The one and only one, legal compressor
<snip>
10. While we hear "but it passed in XXXX" every year, the inspectors have been trained to selectively eliminate that from their hearing database.

One and only one compressor. IF you have a second compressor, even a legal one, you may NOT use it unless you retire the 1st compressor. The unfair advantage of a second compressor is to keep your main compressor cooler and/or to wear less.

It does not matter where else it passed, inspectors always approach it as if it were the first event of the season. Don't even bother saying it.

Inspectors are there to help you pass inspection. Giving them agita is counterproductive.

sandiegodan 11-04-2012 00:00

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
This is my rookie year as an inspector as well. So far I've inspected in San Diego, Los Angeles and Central Valley in California.

Keeping on the theme of pneumatics, I've seen a lot of relief valves not adjusted correctly even after several competitions. Going to be insisting on this 100% at CMP's.

I've also seen several yellow ring regulators being used as the primary.

Even though both these are clearly on the inspection list, they aren't being checked thoroughly. I assume at Championships we are going to be insistent these are brought into compliance.

Don't get me started on bumpers and numbering ...

Tristan Lall 11-04-2012 01:57

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sandiegodan (Post 1156655)
Keeping on the theme of pneumatics, I've seen a lot of relief valves not adjusted correctly even after several competitions. Going to be insisting on this 100% at CMP's.

My guess is that FIRST ordered (or received) a batch of these Norgren 16-004-011 relief valves without having specified the preset or the threadlocker (i.e. 16-004-011-Z125). In theory, if you order the right part, they come preset and are not adjustable. It's also possible that Norgren erred.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandiegodan (Post 1156655)
I've also seen several yellow ring regulators being used as the primary.

Absolutely required and enforceable, yet the rule is utterly useless (and has been forever). The Monnier 101-3002-1 is rated to 250 lb/in2 maximum input pressure. (And I suspect there's probably a safety factor on top of that.)

It's probably relegated to the secondary position because someone at FIRST panicked when they saw 5–50 lb/in2 on old datasheets, and didn't know that this was just the the range within which the regulator was designed to be adjusted (and moreover, didn't know that regulators rarely fail catastrophically, and that there's a large difference between the rated pressure and the burst pressure anyway). Besides, at some point, Monnier issued an engineering note certifying that the regulators could actually be adjusted through 60 lb/in2 for FRC use, and has since updated their catalogue to match. The 0–100 lb/in2 gauge range tells you what gauge to buy—see later in the catalogue for examples. (Recall that the gauges go on the regulated output ports, not the one input port. This is not a pressure rating!)

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandiegodan (Post 1156655)
Even though both these are clearly on the inspection list, they aren't being checked thoroughly. I assume at Championships we are going to be insistent these are brought into compliance.

That has been typical practice at the Championship. I'd say that (as of a couple years ago) about 30% of Championship teams using pneumatics showed up with the Monnier (yellow ring) regulator or an ill-adjusted relief valve. And they've all been to at least one event already, and the rules on these items have been relatively consistent for about a decade.

Al Skierkiewicz 11-04-2012 08:16

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Tristan,
Pre-calibrated valves have not been available in the KOP for three years. The procedure is simple enough and the solution is less costly for the KOP.

The Norgren is a holdover from a time when the primary regulator was not adjustable.

And yes, many of the yellow ring regulators were missed during the season. they always are. The Norgren is the one that is entirely black including the base.

The supplies in the KOP are carefully chosen by the KOP engineers. If you think about it, the KOP engineers have a nearly impossible task each year. They have to come up with a cost effective grouping of parts that anyone can use, meet certain acceptable standards for safety, are readily available as spares and are durable enough that they can be used over and over in other robots. All of this in addition to their other duties and the need to sit in on GDC discussions about the game on a regular basis. Thank you Kate and Collin for the great job you do each year.

Tristan Lall 11-04-2012 19:21

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz (Post 1156760)
Pre-calibrated valves have not been available in the KOP for three years. The procedure is simple enough and the solution is less costly for the KOP.

FIRST says "[t]he valve may or may not have been calibrated prior to being supplied to teams", and has implied in the past that the uncalibrated relief valves were inadvertent. If it's now an intended cost-saving measure (which makes sense), FIRST should simply state that clearly, and link to the adjustment instructions in the manual (for those who lose the ones in the bag).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz (Post 1156760)
The Norgren is a holdover from a time when the primary regulator was not adjustable.

Do you mean the Norgren regulator, or the Norgren relief valve? And which regulator wasn't adjustable?

The old Norgren regulator (R07-153-RNEA) used around 2002 (and I believe before that) was of a similar type to the current one (R07-100-RNEA). Incidentally, the Norgren R07-100-RNEA (primary regulator, with the all-black case) is a 5–50 lb/in2 adjustable relieving regulator, rated for 300 lb/in2 maximum. It happens to work at 60 lb/in2, but that's outside the manufacturer's specified output range.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz (Post 1156760)
The supplies in the KOP are carefully chosen by the KOP engineers.

No question about that.

Al Skierkiewicz 12-04-2012 08:15

Re: Tips from a veteran Robot Inspector
 
Tristan,
At one time the relief valves came pre-calibrated and teams who have those from previous KOP may not need to calibrate them. Those received in 2010 KOP may have been calibrated or not depending on the lot they came from. The remainder and those shipped in 2011 and 2012 KOP were reported to be not calibrated.
The Norgren regulator was used because it could not be adjusted to anything higher than 60 psi and in most cases was shipped at that setting.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi