![]() |
2012 FLR Robots
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Here is our robot! Team 3528
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFwkC...91FUAAAAAAAAAA |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
I swear that half of the robots posted in the Showcase section are FLR robots.
On another subject, who would be interested in a Chief Delphi meetup at FLR this year? |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
The link to 191 takes me to a picture of 1551. Everything else looks good, thanks for the list!
Edit: Totally down for the meet up, as long as we pick a convenient time for everyone involved. |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Team 2228
http://www.2011.hflrobotics.com/imag...lery/robot.jpg I might be interested in the meetup. |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Thanks for making my job so much easier!!
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
To teams 145, 1507, 3015, 3157
Heads up: your bumpers as shown here are ILLEGAL as per rule <R35>. <R35>: Teams shall display their team number on the Bumpers in four locations at approximately 90° intervals around the perimeter of the Robot. The numerals must be at least 4 in. high, at least ¾ in. in stroke width, and be either white in color or outlined in white. Team numbers must be clearly visible from a distance of not less than 100 ft, so that judges, referees, and announcers can easily identify competing Robots. Question on 2/8/12 by Team 1619: Quote:
3157, your bumpers in that video have numbers split across the front, also ruled illegal by the Q&A. |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
1405
![]() |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
I added a picture of the Team 2053 robot to CD Media, but I don't know how to add it here. Sorry!
Deb |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Post the url of the picture here.
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/37529 is a better picture than the one linked -- new side panels and a paint job!
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
There are some pretty nice robots attending FLR this year. I expect nothing less! Good luck to all teams atending and I cannot wait to see how everyone does!
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Quote:
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Here is the link to the FIRST Team 2053 robot:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/37531 |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
2 Attachment(s)
Hey Ed! Here is some more updated photos of our robot.
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Hey Larry, these pics look good. We look forward to joining your team and 191 in the 'blinding lights club' this year.
P.S. Thanks for all the help this build season. |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Quote:
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
I am looking forward to seeing all of these bots in person this year. They are looking great!
|
Can't wait to see everyone
I can't wait to see all the robots. (and the people who made them too.) good luck everyone!
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
I thought that I posted the link to the TigerTronics picture, but I guess I didn't. Here is the link to the FIRST Team 2053 robot: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/37531
|
Re: Can't wait to see everyone
It's the only good photo I've got at the current moment. I'll see what I can do about getting a better shot someone else on the team took.
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f2...r/DSCN7062.jpg |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Thanks for getting Devil Tech up there Steve.
Looks like we have some great robots in the mix... I look forward to competing with all of you this year! Edit: Is there a marginally smaller number of teams attending this year? |
Re: Can't wait to see everyone
Quote:
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Quote:
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Yeah, only one Canadian team and no Michigan teams this year :(
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
This sucks I wont be getting any more rubber chickens to add to my collection this year:(
Quote:
Awesome robot maybe we can work together like we did at the Ruckus :) Quote:
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
On our drive train - it has been designed over the past year by mentors and students, and machined and built by the students this entire build season. I personally do not know much of it, however the students are excited to show it off and answer all of your questions. It really is a beauty to behold.
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Quote:
My guess is that 174 put together a swerve with a custom gearbox, similar to what 118 did back in 2007. Maybe a 3 CIM, 1 or 2 FP gearbox running a coaxial swerve? I can see at least one FP motor elsewhere on the robot, so I don't know what is running the drive, but I'm guessing it's handled with a central gearbox. |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Whoops was thinking of 188. But they aren't coming this year.
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
We finished our unveil video a little late... I dropped it in the Robot Showcase, but I figure here's a good place, too: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrM2GlbGOBQ
(Oh, and at about 2:20 you can see the Warlocks bank three in a row in teleop!) |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Looks good 1551. So when you go over the bump do you use the mechs?
Also when will you you use the plaction wheels? For pushing? I want to investigate your robot more at FLR. Curious. |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Quote:
Quote:
B. Bridge traction -- we *can* balance with the mecanum wheels, but the lower speed, higher traction drive is great for easier balancing -- it also allows us to park in place (sideways or longways) and let our alliance partners balance with us as dead weight if that's easier for them. |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Excuse my stupidness when it comes to drive trains. :)
Also, if they would use you as a dead weight wouldn't you use the mechs? Then you could turn easily and go sideways. And it would be easy for them to push you if needed. But I don't know how well the mechs will actually grip the actual material on the bridges because its very slippery. |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Quote:
Looks good, can't wait to learn more about it |
Re: 2012 FLR Robots
Quote:
Our design has been modular from the beginning, with a down/up-scale functionality based on what it is that we are actually able to pull off. That is to say, not only our mechanical systems, but our strategy has been modular -- we designed things so that pushing for more than we think we might be able to accomplish actually brought us closer to more realistic goals as well, so that time was well-spent even if the ultimate functionality envisioned didn't pay off. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:55. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi