Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Regional Competitions (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Alamo 2012 (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=103781)

mwmac 02-03-2012 11:25

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Aren_Hill (Post 1137591)
well anything saying they didn't just drive onto the bridge to balance?

chat indicated they hung, ruled a technical, usfirst showed no balance pts for Match 1, 118 asked for ruling, balance points restored. I did not see as stream was down for early matches

BigJ 02-03-2012 11:25

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber (Post 1137593)
Congrats... there was a balance. Who was on the bridge? Can you tell me that from that information? If you can could you also tell me some lottery numbers? I'd like to retire early.

Just providing the information that likely led to the assumption. Chill :)

thefro526 02-03-2012 11:31

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Match 009, 148 did not move and their number was red.

Did they get a red card? Or does Red mean no comms?

tim-tim 02-03-2012 11:37

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thefro526 (Post 1137596)
Match 009, 148 did not move and their number was red.

Did they get a red card? Or does Red mean no comms?

No, there was a field issue that bypassed them.

That match will be rerun right before lunch

Justin Ridley 02-03-2012 11:41

Re: Alamo 2012
 
The Robonauts were informed this morning our mechanism would be penalized if used. We did not attempt to hang in our first match, nor will we for the remainder of this tournament. 2936 balanced the bridge for 10 pts. The head ref announced the ruling to the regional during a break after match 4. I will post more details on this at a later time.

JaneYoung 02-03-2012 11:42

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber (Post 1137593)
Congrats... there was a balance. Who was on the bridge? Can you tell me that from that information? If you can could you also tell me some lottery numbers? I'd like to retire early.

Can we save the snarkiness for other places and leave it off CD and off this thread?

Jane

jwfoss 02-03-2012 11:44

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Justin Ridley (Post 1137600)
The Robonauts were informed this morning our mechanism would be penalized if used. We did not attempt to hang in our first match, nor will we for the remainder of this tournament. 2936 balanced the bridge for 10 pts. The head ref announced the ruling to the regional during a break after match 4. I will post more details on this at a later time.

Thank you again for providing us direct information on your team's situation. I am interested to hear the exact wording of the ruling and how it will effect teams throughout the rest of the season. I look forward to your comments.

thefro526 02-03-2012 11:46

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tim-tim (Post 1137598)
No, there was a field issue that bypassed them.

That match will be rerun right before lunch

Thanks for the clarification.

Tom Bottiglieri 02-03-2012 11:47

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Justin Ridley (Post 1137600)
The Robonauts were informed this morning our mechanism would be penalized if used. We did not attempt to hang in our first match, nor will we for the remainder of this tournament. 2936 balanced the bridge for 10 pts. The head ref announced the ruling to the regional during a break after match 4. I will post more details on this at a later time.

That's too bad Justin. I was really hoping this would be ruled legal.

Andy Baker 02-03-2012 12:00

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Justin Ridley (Post 1137600)
The Robonauts were informed this morning our mechanism would be penalized if used. We did not attempt to hang in our first match, nor will we for the remainder of this tournament. 2936 balanced the bridge for 10 pts. The head ref announced the ruling to the regional during a break after match 4. I will post more details on this at a later time.

Thanks for the update, Justin. Congrats to your team for going out on a limb and designing a mechanism that was risky, but inspirational at the same time. You guys created this most likely for the sake of seeing if it could be done, and to push the envelope.

I believe that you guys did this in a very appropriately timed fashion, publishing a video around the time of kickoff and also demonstrating this during practice day at a week 1 regional.

As usual, 118 is a classy and innovative team.

Sincerely,
Andy Baker

tim-tim 02-03-2012 13:06

Re: Alamo 2012
 
118 just flipped and took a hit while trying to balance on the coopertition bridge.

Hope everything is ok

jblay 02-03-2012 13:30

Re: Alamo 2012
 
1477's fender shooting is deadly. It will be interesting to see where they go tomorrow. 118 is also fender shooting but to the side with the turret, the two of them would fit well together and would be a deadly combo. It will also be interesting to see what 148 can do when fully operational and how they fit into the equation. I have a strong feeling that 2 of these 3 teams will be in the top alliance.

AdamHeard 02-03-2012 13:32

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy Baker (Post 1137608)
Thanks for the update, Justin. Congrats to your team for going out on a limb and designing a mechanism that was risky, but inspirational at the same time. You guys created this most likely for the sake of seeing if it could be done, and to push the envelope.

I believe that you guys did this in a very appropriately timed fashion, publishing a video around the time of kickoff and also demonstrating this during practice day at a week 1 regional.

As usual, 118 is a classy and innovative team.

Sincerely,
Andy Baker

I'm curious if Tuesday's team update will provide any commentary on this issue, or will FIRST just let the ruling of a head ref at one regional be the indication to all teams around the world of whether or not this system is legal.

Kevin Sevcik 02-03-2012 13:38

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 1137641)
I'm curious if Tuesday's team update will provide any commentary on this issue, or will FIRST just let the ruling of a head ref at one regional be the indication to all teams around the world of whether or not this system is legal.

It would seem like someone should announce it. I know it will likely get passed around among the head refs, but everyone in FIRST isn't following the situation on CD and all that. Or, at least, FIRST shouldn't assume they are.

Tristan Lall 02-03-2012 13:41

Re: Alamo 2012
 
So is it just me, or is something screwy about the co-opertition bridge scoring?

In the rankings page, three teams are listed with 2 CP each, and all others have 0 CP each. That's not possible if the Twitter feed is accurate. CPs are scored for both alliances simultaneously, and can't be erased by DQs (although the QPs that ordinarily result would not count).

(Also, the FMS web feed seems to have just gone down, so you may have to wait a while to check this.)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi