Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Regional Competitions (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Alamo 2012 (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=103781)

I-DOG 24-02-2012 21:31

Alamo 2012
 
So who is attending alamo?

midway78224 24-02-2012 21:41

Re: Alamo 2012
 
We will be going to lone star but since we are from san antonio we will be watching from the stands.

Madison 24-02-2012 21:45

Re: Alamo 2012
 
We'll be there with a skeleton crew. It's going to be fun to see how another region plays robots.

AllenGregoryIV 24-02-2012 21:48

Re: Alamo 2012
 
I'll be inspecting and we should have a few other volunteers from my team there as well on Saturday.

JaneYoung 24-02-2012 22:28

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AllenGregoryIV (Post 1134422)
I'll be inspecting and we should have a few other volunteers from my team there as well on Saturday.

Some of the folks from 418 will be joining you guys in helping to support the Alamo Regional by volunteering. I can only come volunteer on Thursday but I am looking forward to it. I'm sooooo excited that Madison and 488 are making the trip to San Antonio for the first time!

Jane

MattC9 24-02-2012 23:06

Re: Alamo 2012
 
2158 is chomping at the bit.

Andrew Schuetze 24-02-2012 23:59

Re: Alamo 2012
 
I'll post on be half of the 36 advancing FTC teams from the Austin, Brownsville, Laredo and two San Antonio FTC qualifiers competing on Friday for a chance to earn a spot at world's. Likewise, 61 FLL teams on Saturday as part of the brand new FLL Championship.
If you team is bringing more than a skeleton crew, we could use some FTC and FLL practice field monitors and judge assistants on Friday and Saturday. PM or send me a note if you want to volunteer.:cool:

Koko Ed 25-02-2012 06:40

Re: Alamo 2012
 
I'll be there telling people where to go, what to do, when to do it and how fast I want them to do it. Don't ask me why. It's a que thang, you gots to understand...

dricks 25-02-2012 08:35

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Team 704 will be there!!

JaneYoung 25-02-2012 09:53

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Koko Ed (Post 1134563)
I'll be there telling people where to go, what to do, when to do it and how fast I want them to do it. Don't ask me why. It's a que thang, you gots to understand...

You'll get to see some of the teams you met at Texas Robot Round-up and meet some new ones. Thank you for coming all this way, Ed!

Jane

Koko Ed 25-02-2012 10:11

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneYoung (Post 1134589)
You'll get to see some of the teams you met at Texas Robot Round-up and meet some new ones. Thank you for coming all this way, Ed!

Jane

Thank Southwest for flying me there. It's why I picked Alamo over Smokey Mountains.

Madison 27-02-2012 20:11

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Out of curiosity, is San Antonio's downtown completely dead and abandoned on a weeknight? We arrive fairly late and will want food, I'm sure. Is Riverwalk always kinda alive?

SR-71 27-02-2012 23:02

Re: Alamo 2012
 
2583 will be there! It should be a good one.

Kevin Sevcik 27-02-2012 23:47

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Madison (Post 1135795)
Out of curiosity, is San Antonio's downtown completely dead and abandoned on a weeknight? We arrive fairly late and will want food, I'm sure. Is Riverwalk always kinda alive?

The Riverwalk's busy till really late. I don't think you'll have too much trouble finding someplace to eat. Most places are open til at least 10pm there. Barriba Cantina is open till 2am, and I'm sure there's other places open late.

Also, it's probably out of your price range ($25 entrees) but Boudro's makes tableside guacamole that's ridiculously good.

Andrew Schuetze 28-02-2012 00:27

Re: Alamo 2012
 
San Antonio has a vibrant downtown. There are many establishments along the Riverwalk which serve food and drinks of both kinds late. There is a McDonalds and even a Fuddruckers if you want a 1/3, 1/2, ... build your own burger on a homemade bun, ... On your way downtown, you can stop at any number of local or chain Mexican food restruantes. Taco Cabana is open late with the original location on Hildebrand & San Pedro just off of US HWY 281 which is on the way from the airport.

In short, Downtown San Antonio is tourist friendly place with the Alamo, Riverwalk, Rivercenter Mall, Ripleys Believe it or Not Museum, House of Wax, ....:D

Andrew Schuetze 28-02-2012 00:30

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Koko Ed (Post 1134592)
Thank Southwest for flying me there. It's why I picked Alamo over Smokey Mountains.

Any reason to you pick SA over any other week one event is a reason the celebrate.:)

JohnSchneider 28-02-2012 00:42

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Schuetze (Post 1135956)
Any reason to you pick SA over any other week one event is a reason the celebrate.:)

Dont sell yourself short... Alamo has a frightening list of teams attending this year. It may be one of the better week 1s.


Im not From SA but I am from the wonderful state that houses it,

And for any visiting teams I would recommend going to the River walk at night.

If you have Wednesday or Sunday to spare, I would also recommend going to the Alamo, its a cool piece of Texas History.

Kevin Sevcik 28-02-2012 01:12

Re: Alamo 2012
 
The Alamo is neat, and all, but Ripley's Believe it or Not is a lot more likely to amuse a bunch of robot nerds.

JohnSchneider 28-02-2012 01:28

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Those aren't just in SA though. Whereas that is the only place to see the Alamo :P

Andrew Schuetze 28-02-2012 10:29

Re: Alamo 2012
 
For the Civil Engineering nerds, the Riverwalk has a north reach that opened in recent years that has a lock system to move the barges upstream. It has some really nice walking / jogging paths and on the right Saturday morning you might find a FIRST Senior Mentor with his relay for life team. SA also has less than year old rent a bike program with bikes parked in stations ready to accept cash or credit for pay by the day/hour rental. Somewhere near the River Center Mall is a Segway self-guided tour of the downtown store. One has to pass a short safety course::safety:: I think before they let you out of the shop.

Madison 28-02-2012 15:05

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Thanks, everyone, for the recommendations. I'm sure we'll wander around Riverwalk during the evenings -- our hotel is, I believe, right alongside it.

My Sunday will be spent at Fiesta Texas. I can't pass up a chance to ride roller coasters.

Kevin Sevcik 28-02-2012 15:54

Re: Alamo 2012
 
It's been a while since I've been, but the Poltergeist was good last time I was there. LIM coaster that launches you at 60 mph into, literally, a huge knot of track. Plus you can hear it sounding spooky from a quarter of the park away.

Madison 28-02-2012 16:44

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Sevcik (Post 1136253)
It's been a while since I've been, but the Poltergeist was good last time I was there. LIM coaster that launches you at 60 mph into, literally, a huge knot of track. Plus you can hear it sounding spooky from a quarter of the park away.

Yeah, I am looking forward to Poltergeist; it's a clone of the Flight of Fear coasters in Virginia and Ohio and I quite liked the Virginia version when I last rode it several years ago. I'm also looking forward to Goliath, a mirror-image of the original Batman: The Ride at Great America near Chicago.

Krypton Coaster is the longest floorless coaster in the world, so that's cool; and for awhile, it had the largest vertical loop in the world. I'm also kinda curious about Rattler. It has an interesting history and has been completely neutered, so I'm interested to see what could've been there.

JaneYoung 28-02-2012 17:17

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Madison (Post 1136282)
Yeah, I am looking forward to Poltergeist; it's a clone of the Flight of Fear coasters in Virginia and Ohio and I quite liked the Virginia version when I last rode it several years ago. I'm also looking forward to Goliath, a mirror-image of the original Batman: The Ride at Great America near Chicago.

Krypton Coaster is the longest floorless coaster in the world, so that's cool; and for awhile, it had the largest vertical loop in the world. I'm also kinda curious about Rattler. It has an interesting history and has been completely neutered, so I'm interested to see what could've been there.

What do you mean by Rattler being neutered and when did that occur? (I think you mean that it has been tamed?)

My husband still talks about the horrors of that ride after several years of trying to forget about it. And he loves roller coasters.

Jane

Madison 28-02-2012 17:27

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneYoung (Post 1136300)
What do you mean by Rattler being neutered and when did that occur? (I think you mean that it has been tamed?)

My husband still talks about the horrors of that ride after several years of trying to forget about it. And he loves roller coasters.

Jane

When The Rattler opened in 1992, it was the tallest, fastest wooden roller coaster in the world. It had a 166' first drop. During the park's off-season each year for the following four years, The Rattler's first drop was in some way re-profiled. The end result was a first drop that is 42' shorter today than when it was originally opened.

The ride was designed and built by the Roller Coaster Corporation of America just before computer's began to revolutionize roller coaster design and is part of a generation of wooden coasters that were, in many ways, too big for their britches. As a consequence, The Rattler was a VERY rough ride when it first opened; the changes to its first dropped were meant to lower its speed and smooth out the violent vibration that occurred at the bottom of that drop.

This video shows the original ride: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4YGPKbKhq0

And this shows the reprofiled drop: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trDnw...feature=fvwrel

JaneYoung 28-02-2012 17:47

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Madison (Post 1136302)
When The Rattler opened in 1992, it was the tallest, fastest wooden roller coaster in the world. It had a 166' first drop. During the park's off-season each year for the following four years, The Rattler's first drop was in some way re-profiled. The end result was a first drop that is 42' shorter today than when it was originally opened.

The ride was designed and built by the Roller Coaster Corporation of America just before computer's began to revolutionize roller coaster design and is part of a generation of wooden coasters that were, in many ways, too big for their britches. As a consequence, The Rattler was a VERY rough ride when it first opened; the changes to its first dropped were meant to lower its speed and smooth out the violent vibration that occurred at the bottom of that drop.

This video shows the original ride: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4YGPKbKhq0

And this shows the reprofiled drop: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trDnw...feature=fvwrel

Ok, we went a few years later which would be after the change. He said, "It was like a controlled crash the entire time." I think you're going to like it. :)

Jane

Kevin Sevcik 29-02-2012 10:47

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Returning to our regularly scheduled programming...

I've worked out a deal with my wife, so I'm actually going to be at Alamo all or most of Saturday. For research purposes. (Spying) And to check in on the various Houston area teams that are attending. So I'll see you all there on Saturday, and you'd better put on a good show, dang it. That's 6 hours round trip I'm driving for you people.

rsisk 29-02-2012 18:09

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Going to miss you guys this year, was already signed up to volunteer for Alamo when San Diego got bumped to week 1. Next year for sure!

tanguma26 29-02-2012 23:19

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Good luck to all the teams attending the Alamo Regional and a special shot out to team 3999 Shadetree Mechanics:)

EricLeifermann 01-03-2012 14:32

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Anybody know what type of ruling 118 has gotten for there hanging balancing?

JohnSchneider 01-03-2012 16:57

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Against my better judgement I have decided to drive from college station to come watch Saturday. I just couldn't wait for robots any longer.

rcmolloy 01-03-2012 16:59

Re: Alamo 2012
 
It's legal, for now.

https://twitter.com/#!/robonauts118

Cory 01-03-2012 17:07

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rcmolloy (Post 1137313)

How did you draw that conclusion? Their feed implies they will not know until tomorrow.

JohnSchneider 01-03-2012 17:09

Re: Alamo 2012
 
If you look at the match in which that happen 118 was on Red and 488 was on blue. The Coopertition score is 0...this would actually imply it didn't count...

Time will tell...

rcmolloy 01-03-2012 17:11

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Hmm, why would they post then? This is only going to get more and more frustrating until qualifications start.

JohnSchneider 01-03-2012 17:14

Re: Alamo 2012
 
"successfully balanced" could just mean that the Bridge was level.

Successful != legal

Like I said - the field system shows they were awarded 0 points.

Cory 01-03-2012 17:14

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rcmolloy (Post 1137322)
Hmm, why would they post then? This is only going to get more and more frustrating until qualifications start.

I read the tweet as meaning they were physically successful, not necessarily legally successful.

rcmolloy 01-03-2012 17:17

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cory (Post 1137328)
I read the tweet as meaning they were physically successful, not necessarily legally successful.

Yes I do see it now. I did tweet them back for a more concise clarification on the ruling.

Nick Lawrence 01-03-2012 17:20

Re: Alamo 2012
 
I was told by a student on another team that the ruling would be handed out tomorrow.

-Nick

JohnSchneider 01-03-2012 17:22

Re: Alamo 2012
 
I wouldnt be surprised if the Refs had to call the GDC and clarify if it's in the "spirit of the game".

Scott England 01-03-2012 19:34

Re: Alamo 2012
 
There's a picture of that balance with 488 on the Robonauts facebook page. I think it's publicly viewable. Just search Robonauts.

wireties 01-03-2012 22:28

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by animenerdjohn (Post 1137312)
Against my better judgement I have decided to drive from college station to come watch Saturday. I just couldn't wait for robots any longer.


I loved the Alamo last year - alas, it coincided with a band trip this year.

Have fun and take notes!

AlecMataloni 01-03-2012 22:38

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Honestly, even if the balancing mechanism is ruled illegal, at least 118 will have an awesome bridge manipulator. It's not like they built their entire robot around one strategy that got ruled illegal (see the Troll Bot discussion).

However, if their method IS legal, Then i'm expecting every competition to play this sound whenever they balance: http://inception.davepedu.com/ ;) .

SGS 01-03-2012 22:49

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

The Coopertition score is 0...this would actually imply it didn't count...
The entire day they were not scoring bridge points. Numerous teams including ours balanced but the points were not displayed. The points being neglected does not imply anything.

Let's see what happens tomorrow!

Koko Ed 01-03-2012 22:53

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott England (Post 1137373)
There's a picture of that balance with 488 on the Robonauts facebook page. I think it's publicly viewable. Just search Robonauts.


Aren_Hill 01-03-2012 22:56

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlecMataloni (Post 1137451)
Honestly, even if the balancing mechanism is ruled illegal, at least 118 will have an awesome bridge manipulator. It's not like they built their entire robot around one strategy that got ruled illegal (see the Troll Bot discussion).

Aside from the trollbot we'd built could still manipulate the bridge and pickup and shoot balls....

AlecMataloni 01-03-2012 23:19

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Aren_Hill (Post 1137466)
Aside from the trollbot we'd built could still manipulate the bridge and pickup and shoot balls....

You're right. I should've used 190's 2008 hurdling mechanism, or 68's field-obstructing mechanism in 2003 as an example.

mwmac 02-03-2012 10:41

Re: Alamo 2012
 
looks like 118's hang has been ruled legal. Match 1 score changed to add 10 bridge points.

juchong 02-03-2012 10:50

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Anyone know if there's a live stream of the matches?

JohnSchneider 02-03-2012 10:51

Re: Alamo 2012
 
why is the stream still down?

mwmac 02-03-2012 10:52

Re: Alamo 2012
 
stream is still offline

sdcantrell56 02-03-2012 11:00

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mwmac (Post 1137577)
looks like 118's hang has been ruled legal. Match 1 score changed to add 10 bridge points.

That's interesting considering a 118 mentor told me this morning they were ruled illegal. You sure you have your story straight?

Chinmay 02-03-2012 11:02

Re: Alamo 2012
 
stream for alamo is working now

http://madstream.team1323.com/

Chinmay 02-03-2012 11:04

Re: Alamo 2012
 
cast for Alamo is working now

mwmac 02-03-2012 11:08

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sdcantrell56 (Post 1137585)
That's interesting considering a 118 mentor told me this morning they were ruled illegal. You sure you have your story straight?

Yes. check usfirst match results

juchong 02-03-2012 11:08

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Link here.

Lowfategg 02-03-2012 11:17

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mwmac (Post 1137588)
Yes. check usfirst match results

Don't mean they balanced with it, could be they just went on the bridge like normal.

Aren_Hill 02-03-2012 11:18

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mwmac (Post 1137588)
Yes. check usfirst match results

well anything saying they didn't just drive onto the bridge to balance?

BigJ 02-03-2012 11:18

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sdcantrell56 (Post 1137585)
That's interesting considering a 118 mentor told me this morning they were ruled illegal. You sure you have your story straight?

Initial result from FMS twitter:

#FRCSTX TY Q MC 1 RF 43 BF 5 RA 118 3582 2936 BA 3999 3353 3103 RB 10 BB 0 RFP 9 BFP 0 RHS 6 BHS 5 RTS 18 BTS 0 CP 0

(43 points)

Result on event match results now:

9:15 AM 1 118 3582 2936 3999 3353 3103 53 5

(53 points)

Sources:
http://twitter.com/#!/frcfms/status/175597747330756608
http://www2.usfirst.org/2012comp/Eve...chresults.html

Andrew Schreiber 02-03-2012 11:24

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BigJ (Post 1137592)
Initial result from FMS twitter:

#FRCSTX TY Q MC 1 RF 43 BF 5 RA 118 3582 2936 BA 3999 3353 3103 RB 10 BB 0 RFP 9 BFP 0 RHS 6 BHS 5 RTS 18 BTS 0 CP 0

(43 points)

Result on event match results now:

9:15 AM 1 118 3582 2936 3999 3353 3103 53 5

(53 points)

Sources:
http://twitter.com/#!/frcfms/status/175597747330756608
http://www2.usfirst.org/2012comp/Eve...chresults.html


Congrats... there was a balance. Who was on the bridge? Can you tell me that from that information? If you can could you also tell me some lottery numbers? I'd like to retire early.

mwmac 02-03-2012 11:25

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Aren_Hill (Post 1137591)
well anything saying they didn't just drive onto the bridge to balance?

chat indicated they hung, ruled a technical, usfirst showed no balance pts for Match 1, 118 asked for ruling, balance points restored. I did not see as stream was down for early matches

BigJ 02-03-2012 11:25

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber (Post 1137593)
Congrats... there was a balance. Who was on the bridge? Can you tell me that from that information? If you can could you also tell me some lottery numbers? I'd like to retire early.

Just providing the information that likely led to the assumption. Chill :)

thefro526 02-03-2012 11:31

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Match 009, 148 did not move and their number was red.

Did they get a red card? Or does Red mean no comms?

tim-tim 02-03-2012 11:37

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thefro526 (Post 1137596)
Match 009, 148 did not move and their number was red.

Did they get a red card? Or does Red mean no comms?

No, there was a field issue that bypassed them.

That match will be rerun right before lunch

Justin Ridley 02-03-2012 11:41

Re: Alamo 2012
 
The Robonauts were informed this morning our mechanism would be penalized if used. We did not attempt to hang in our first match, nor will we for the remainder of this tournament. 2936 balanced the bridge for 10 pts. The head ref announced the ruling to the regional during a break after match 4. I will post more details on this at a later time.

JaneYoung 02-03-2012 11:42

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber (Post 1137593)
Congrats... there was a balance. Who was on the bridge? Can you tell me that from that information? If you can could you also tell me some lottery numbers? I'd like to retire early.

Can we save the snarkiness for other places and leave it off CD and off this thread?

Jane

jwfoss 02-03-2012 11:44

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Justin Ridley (Post 1137600)
The Robonauts were informed this morning our mechanism would be penalized if used. We did not attempt to hang in our first match, nor will we for the remainder of this tournament. 2936 balanced the bridge for 10 pts. The head ref announced the ruling to the regional during a break after match 4. I will post more details on this at a later time.

Thank you again for providing us direct information on your team's situation. I am interested to hear the exact wording of the ruling and how it will effect teams throughout the rest of the season. I look forward to your comments.

thefro526 02-03-2012 11:46

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tim-tim (Post 1137598)
No, there was a field issue that bypassed them.

That match will be rerun right before lunch

Thanks for the clarification.

Tom Bottiglieri 02-03-2012 11:47

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Justin Ridley (Post 1137600)
The Robonauts were informed this morning our mechanism would be penalized if used. We did not attempt to hang in our first match, nor will we for the remainder of this tournament. 2936 balanced the bridge for 10 pts. The head ref announced the ruling to the regional during a break after match 4. I will post more details on this at a later time.

That's too bad Justin. I was really hoping this would be ruled legal.

Andy Baker 02-03-2012 12:00

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Justin Ridley (Post 1137600)
The Robonauts were informed this morning our mechanism would be penalized if used. We did not attempt to hang in our first match, nor will we for the remainder of this tournament. 2936 balanced the bridge for 10 pts. The head ref announced the ruling to the regional during a break after match 4. I will post more details on this at a later time.

Thanks for the update, Justin. Congrats to your team for going out on a limb and designing a mechanism that was risky, but inspirational at the same time. You guys created this most likely for the sake of seeing if it could be done, and to push the envelope.

I believe that you guys did this in a very appropriately timed fashion, publishing a video around the time of kickoff and also demonstrating this during practice day at a week 1 regional.

As usual, 118 is a classy and innovative team.

Sincerely,
Andy Baker

tim-tim 02-03-2012 13:06

Re: Alamo 2012
 
118 just flipped and took a hit while trying to balance on the coopertition bridge.

Hope everything is ok

jblay 02-03-2012 13:30

Re: Alamo 2012
 
1477's fender shooting is deadly. It will be interesting to see where they go tomorrow. 118 is also fender shooting but to the side with the turret, the two of them would fit well together and would be a deadly combo. It will also be interesting to see what 148 can do when fully operational and how they fit into the equation. I have a strong feeling that 2 of these 3 teams will be in the top alliance.

AdamHeard 02-03-2012 13:32

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy Baker (Post 1137608)
Thanks for the update, Justin. Congrats to your team for going out on a limb and designing a mechanism that was risky, but inspirational at the same time. You guys created this most likely for the sake of seeing if it could be done, and to push the envelope.

I believe that you guys did this in a very appropriately timed fashion, publishing a video around the time of kickoff and also demonstrating this during practice day at a week 1 regional.

As usual, 118 is a classy and innovative team.

Sincerely,
Andy Baker

I'm curious if Tuesday's team update will provide any commentary on this issue, or will FIRST just let the ruling of a head ref at one regional be the indication to all teams around the world of whether or not this system is legal.

Kevin Sevcik 02-03-2012 13:38

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 1137641)
I'm curious if Tuesday's team update will provide any commentary on this issue, or will FIRST just let the ruling of a head ref at one regional be the indication to all teams around the world of whether or not this system is legal.

It would seem like someone should announce it. I know it will likely get passed around among the head refs, but everyone in FIRST isn't following the situation on CD and all that. Or, at least, FIRST shouldn't assume they are.

Tristan Lall 02-03-2012 13:41

Re: Alamo 2012
 
So is it just me, or is something screwy about the co-opertition bridge scoring?

In the rankings page, three teams are listed with 2 CP each, and all others have 0 CP each. That's not possible if the Twitter feed is accurate. CPs are scored for both alliances simultaneously, and can't be erased by DQs (although the QPs that ordinarily result would not count).

(Also, the FMS web feed seems to have just gone down, so you may have to wait a while to check this.)

Tristan Lall 02-03-2012 13:42

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tristan Lall (Post 1137646)
In the rankings page, three teams are listed with 2 CP each, and all others have 0 CP each.

And now the standings are back...but with 1 CP each. Still wrong.

juchong 02-03-2012 14:06

Re: Alamo 2012
 
That's week 1 for you!

Tristan Lall 02-03-2012 14:22

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Match 25: if you can't shoot, for god's sake, go for the bridges! (Especially the middle one.)

tim-tim 02-03-2012 14:37

Re: Alamo 2012
 
did anyone else lose audio on the webcast?

Chris86 02-03-2012 14:41

Re: Alamo 2012
 
ALL OF THE BRIDGES!!!!!! AHAHHAA best match I've seen yet

JaneYoung 02-03-2012 14:44

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris86 (Post 1137665)
ALL OF THE BRIDGES!!!!!! AHAHHAA best match I've seen yet

Oh man. What am I missing by being at work?!

(On break... )

Jane

Chris86 02-03-2012 14:49

Re: Alamo 2012
 
231, 118, 3481 on red vs 2583, 3417, and 2789 on blue (one of the three was missing, I didn't see which)

Red balanced their bridge with 2. Coopertition was balanced with 2. Blue alliance bridge was balanced with the last robot. All robots on the field were balanced, too cool.

(Red put 4 balls in autonomous too, also impressive)

JaneYoung 02-03-2012 14:59

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Thanks, Chris. I bet the fans in the stands went nuts.

Wow.

Jane

Tristan Lall 02-03-2012 15:18

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris86 (Post 1137669)
231, 118, 3481 on red vs 2583, 3417, and 2789 on blue (one of the three was missing, I didn't see which)

Red balanced their bridge with 2. Coopertition was balanced with 2. Blue alliance bridge was balanced with the last robot. All robots on the field were balanced, too cool.



In this case, it looks like the Twitter feed has got it right (2 CP); the FMS feed still doesn't (blue didn't get any CP/red got 2 each).

Chris86 02-03-2012 15:32

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Blue isnt supposed to have any. They made an announcement that the entire blue alliance got DQd for the match because one of their robots hadn't passed inspection and that human player was still playing -> pretty rough on the blue alliance imo, but I guess those are the rules

Tristan Lall 02-03-2012 15:43

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris86 (Post 1137687)
Blue isnt supposed to have any. They made an announcement that the entire blue alliance got DQd for the match because one of their robots hadn't passed inspection and that human player was still playing -> pretty rough on the blue alliance imo, but I guess those are the rules

I didn't hear the announcement. (The non-inspected robot DQ affects the whole alliance, even in qualifying rounds, so that much is right.)

Regardless, disqualified teams are supposed to keep their CP, but forfeit the QP bonus (equal to the number of CP earned) along with the rest of their QP for that match. This impacts the rankings for the Co-Opertition Award.

Sean Raia 02-03-2012 15:46

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Some of these matches are just depressing...
I understand that its the first week of competition but still.

PayneTrain 02-03-2012 17:16

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Apparently they will let some shoddy bumpers through... at least at Alamo. I wish I didn't have to bring it up, but considering how critical we all have been over each other team's bumpers, it annoys me bumpers that break multiple rules are allowed to compete.

Scott England 02-03-2012 18:42

Re: Alamo 2012
 
is the Alamo webcast down for anyone else? Or rather I should ask, does anyone have a working link? I managed to catch the last few but it seems like the feed died around 5:30ish local time with ~10 matches left in the day.

mwmac 02-03-2012 18:46

Re: Alamo 2012
 
it is down. recorded matches keep loading

Scott England 02-03-2012 18:48

Re: Alamo 2012
 
looks like it just came back for the last few seconds of match 64, running through 68 today

MattC9 02-03-2012 20:44

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneYoung (Post 1137672)
Thanks, Chris. I bet the fans in the stands went nuts.

Wow.

Jane

OH they did.

Chris86 02-03-2012 21:06

Re: Alamo 2012
 
I did too! I was screaming and jumping down in my room.

JaneYoung 02-03-2012 21:13

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MattC9 (Post 1137803)
OH they did.

And were there certain fans and team members jumping up and down when one of their amazing team mentors garnered the Outstanding Volunteer Award AND another amazing mentor on the same team garnered the Woodie Flowers Finalist Award? :)

Congratulations to Jess! Congratulations to David!

Oh.my.goodness!

Jane

Scott England 03-03-2012 11:55

Re: Alamo 2012
 
1 Attachment(s)
Has this happened elsewhere yet? (haven't seen a ton of matches)

Something to think about as autonomous plans improve

Cory 03-03-2012 12:15

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott England (Post 1138025)
Has this happened elsewhere yet? (haven't seen a ton of matches)

Something to think about as autonomous plans improve

This has been very common in our testing. The nets are really constricted at the bottom and two balls entering in rapid succession almost always cause jams.

Marc S. 03-03-2012 15:11

Re: Alamo 2012
 
148, 922, 2936 just triple balanced!

EricLeifermann 03-03-2012 15:11

Re: Alamo 2012
 
148's alliance just balanced 3 robots!

speedbuggy76 03-03-2012 15:13

1 Attachment(s)
148 balances three

nickpeq 03-03-2012 15:13

Re: Alamo 2012
 
Amazingly smooth balance.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi