![]() |
Quadruple Balance on Bridge
I would really like to see this. I'm sure it's possible. :D
|
Re: Quadruple Balance on Bridge
This would require working with the other alliance. Unless one alliance is ahead by enough that they are willing to do this just for fun, I do not think it will happen at a regional or St. Louis.
However, if you have 4 teams that are all based near each other and feel like hanging out, why not? It would make a cool video. |
Re: Quadruple Balance on Bridge
Triple balance with 118 hanging off the side? That would make an awesome wallpaper...
|
Re: Quadruple Balance on Bridge
You would need 67 with 522 and their two twins. :)
|
Re: Quadruple Balance on Bridge
Why not five 118 hanging and 179 hanging.. With a regular triple..
|
Re: Quadruple Balance on Bridge
Why not stack with 1501/2054/701 and two wide bots with both 179 and 118?
7 bots on a bridge! |
Re: Quadruple Balance on Bridge
You might run into some weighting problems with 179 hanging off the end...unless you stacked a robot on top of a 1501/2054 style deck at the other end.
|
Re: Quadruple Balance on Bridge
That's what I call Coopertition. Sounds like a challenge for IRI: 2 bonus qualifying points for each pair of robot balances on the Coopertition Bridge at the end of the match.
|
Re: Quadruple Balance on Bridge
The teams that do well don't just "meet the specifications", they go above and beyond. At least give it a try on the practice field.
|
Re: Quadruple Balance on Bridge
Quote:
|
Re: Quadruple Balance on Bridge
Quote:
|
Re: Quadruple Balance on Bridge
Quote:
|
Re: Quadruple Balance on Bridge
Quote:
|
Re: Quadruple Balance on Bridge
Quote:
|
Re: Quadruple Balance on Bridge
Quote:
In the real world, I need to meet or beat specs. But, at the same time, I might be the one setting some of the specs based on what the customer wants. If the customer says, "I want up to three robots on this place" and that place is big enough for three and not four (and barely big enough for three at that), then if I design for 4, 5, or 6 robots, I may be able to meet the customer's specification--but it's not a good solution, because it's outside the customer's needs/wants, and the time I spend engineering that solution can be better spent for other things, like putting as many basketballs as possible into a hoop 10' high, which the customer also wants. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi