Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Michigan Coopertition Stats (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=105441)

Littleboy 05-04-2012 20:40

Michigan Coopertition Stats
 
Week 1: in 20 of 148 matches, it was balanced (13.5%)
Gull Lake: in 3 of 72 matches, it was balanced (4.2%)
Kettering: in 17 of 76 matches, it was balanced (22.4%)
Week 2: in 48 of 160 matches, it was balanced (30.0%)
Traverse City: in 15 of 80 matches, it was balanced (18.8%)
Waterford: in 33 of 80 matches, it was balanced (41.3%)
Week 3: in 66 of 160 matches, it was balanced (41.3%)
West Michigan: in 37 of 80 matches, it was balanced (46.3%)
Detroit: in 29 of 80 matches, it was balanced (36.3%)
Week 4: in 83 of 162 matches, it was balanced (51.2%)
Niles: in 43 of 82 matches, it was balanced (52.4%)
Northville: in 40 of 80 matches, it was balanced (50.0%)
Week 5: in 102 of 160 matches, it was balanced (63.8%)
Livonia: in 51 of 80 matches, it was balanced (63.8%)
Troy: in 51 of 80 matches, it was balanced (63.8%)
Over the weeks, the coopertition bridge has been getting way more use.

Rounded to nearest tenth of a percent.
It may be slightly off.
Feel free to add to it with other events.

JABot67 05-04-2012 21:00

Re: Michigan Coopertition Stats
 
Nice stats! I see that Livonia and Troy tied in Coop Bridge balances - This means that Livonia was just as good as Troy in all other competitive aspects of the game right? :cool:

Tom Line 05-04-2012 22:05

Re: Michigan Coopertition Stats
 
Based on guesstimate extrapolation, I'm betting state champs ends up with coop in the 75% range. (Assuming attempts at coop increase at the same rate and there isn't any.... "funny business" going on in an attempt to hurt certain teams).

Chris Hibner 05-04-2012 22:42

Re: Michigan Coopertition Stats
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Line (Post 1154758)
Based on guesstimate extrapolation, I'm betting state champs ends up with coop in the 75% range. (Assuming attempts at coop increase at the same rate and there isn't any.... "funny business" going on in an attempt to hurt certain teams).

I would be shocked to see funny business at MSC. It doesn't seem to go on there.

MagiChau 05-04-2012 23:10

Re: Michigan Coopertition Stats
 
If we try really hard we could get close to 100% balanced considering there is a very high chance out of 6 robots at least one can tip the bridge. Though that would kind of ruin the point of it affecting seeding if everyone has the same amount of coopertition points.

Littleboy 06-04-2012 09:34

Re: Michigan Coopertition Stats
 
It was balanced a total of 319 matches. (40.4%)

pathew100 09-04-2012 07:31

Re: Michigan Coopertition Stats
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Line (Post 1154758)
Based on guesstimate extrapolation, I'm betting state champs ends up with coop in the 75% range. (Assuming attempts at coop increase at the same rate and there isn't any.... "funny business" going on in an attempt to hurt certain teams).

I wouldn't expect any funny business. The results of MSC count toward the state ranking and who goes to the Championship. So it would be silly to hurt your own qualifying ranking.

Jack Jones 09-04-2012 07:51

Re: Michigan Coopertition Stats
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pathew100 (Post 1155770)
I wouldn't expect any funny business. The results of MSC count toward the state ranking and who goes to the Championship. So it would be silly to hurt your own qualifying ranking.

A ranking point is only worth 1/10 the points rewarded for each step in eliminations. Not only that, first pick will inherit the points of the team that picks them, so then their rank means nothing. There is a history of manipulating the standings and preventing certain alliance selections in that building.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:06.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi