![]() |
Motors for harvester
After the season has finish our team wants to make some changes to our robot. We were using a cim on our harvester but want to try out a new way to power it. So we wondering if any team can let us know how they power their harvester like what motor, gear ratio any information is helpful. Thanks.
|
Re: Motors for harvester
We used an Andymark Gearmotor dircetly driven to our rollers. We found that it was a bit slow though, so we would reccomend a Banebots RS550 with a 26:1 gearbox.
|
Re: Motors for harvester
we have some rs550 with 16:1 gear ratio do you think that will work.
|
Re: Motors for harvester
We used a AM PG71 gearbox with a Banebot 550.
|
Re: Motors for harvester
Quote:
|
Re: Motors for harvester
Our intake roller and ball elevator were driven together, all by a BaneBots 550 through a 16:1 gearbox and a short chain run. The bottom roller was 2" originally; we did add tape between the grooves to build up their depth, so the effective diameter may have been bigger.
|
Re: Motors for harvester
Quote:
|
Re: Motors for harvester
Are initial fast-sucker stage was a 550 with a 16:1 and it worked perfectly with a 1.5 inch pvc roller direct driven.
Our vertical stage was a 550 with a 64:1 directly driven. |
Re: Motors for harvester
Quote:
|
Re: Motors for harvester
we used a 16:1 Banebots RS775 in our latest version roller that worked extremely well.
|
Re: Motors for harvester
Quote:
|
Re: Motors for harvester
What's more important than the gear ratio is the linear speed of the contact point. That's the end all comparison really.
|
Re: Motors for harvester
Quote:
|
Re: Motors for harvester
Quote:
|
Re: Motors for harvester
Quote:
|
Re: Motors for harvester
We ran 2 in compression too, with a 2 in roller. While we used two 16:1 banebots 550, it was way overkill. We actually ended up switching out our motors for our elevator for LA elims to one 16:1 banebots 550, and it was really perfect. I personally would have geared our pickup up a bit, because it seemed quite good, but not as effective as if we had made it faster. If you have the ability to make a custom gearbox, I think two 550s in a 8:1 or 10:1 gearbox would be perfect. If not, revert to 1 550 in a 16:1.
|
Re: Motors for harvester
Quote:
|
Re: Motors for harvester
2 Attachment(s)
I don't know how your harvester is set up, so this may or may not help. We made a single stage gearbox for a Fisher Price motor, then used chain drive to run a roller. The round urethane belting goes up to an idler roller at the top. Ball compression is kind of low at the bottom, maybe an inch, and increase as the balls go up, so they pop out the back at the top.
The gearbox was easy for us to make. We used an older FP gearbox first stage gear, and a 3/8" hex shaft with the ends machined round to fit into the flanged bearings. We just measured carefully and drilled the holes in the Lexan using a drill press. The ball moves about 4 feet up in about a second, which is what we designed it to do. To figure out the gear and chain ratios, we started with that one second time requirement, then figured the needed belt speed. We used that to figure out the gear and chain reduction needed to get the roller to spin that fast based on the no load RPM of the motor, allowing for about 20% speed reduction when it's run with load. We had zero problems with the mechanism through two regionals. |
Re: Motors for harvester
Quote:
|
Re: Motors for harvester
Quote:
We ran the 180ish watt FPs with 1 16:1 planetary gearbox on them to drive our 2.5 inch diameter rollers. At about 1000 rpm free speed at 2.5 inches, it exceeded our robots max speed of about 10 ft/s. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi