Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Off-Season Events (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   2012 IRI Predictions (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=106489)

akoscielski3 15-06-2012 11:04

Re: 2012 IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iVanDuzer (Post 1174079)
I'm finding it sort of strange, especially after the speed and success of the Eh Team, that everyone still seems to doubt two long bots and one wide can triple as effectively as two wide and one long...

I think they are just saying it will be tougher to achieve. Plus keep in mind that 4334 was a lot smaller than normal wide bots. On friday at GTR west 1114, 2056, and 3161 tried triple on the practice field. 3161 is a normal wide bot. They got it but after a fair amout of attempts. Another note in GTR west was that 2056, and 188 denied 1241 because they both didnt want a long bot with them. You can see how good of a choice that was after 2056 won with a triple.

iVanDuzer 15-06-2012 11:36

Re: 2012 IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by akoscielski3 (Post 1174082)
I think they are just saying it will be tougher to achieve. Plus keep in mind that 4334 was a lot smaller than normal wide bots. On friday at GTR west 1114, 2056, and 3161 tried triple on the practice field. 3161 is a normal wide bot. They got it but after a fair amout of attempts. Another note in GTR west was that 2056, and 188 denied 1241 because they both didnt want a long bot with them. You can see how good of a choice that was after 2056 won with a triple.

I know 4334 was much smaller, but I also know that they DID triple with 2852 (I think... whoever DM high Voltage is) in practice in prep for Worlds. I also know that 1241's bridge balancer was untested at GTRE, or that it was deemed unreliable enough to not risk a shot at a regional title (the Coop almost-triple on Newton proves as much). If teams have good and *proven* stingers, then long bots can definitely hang with long bots. And I'd be surprised if the majority of competitive long bots don't have a stinger.

Triple balancing is full of risks to begin with. See 2826+67+4143. Here we have probably the best balancer in FIRST consistently fail to triple with one long bot (sorry to rub it in, huge respect to that whole alliance). It's a risky enough maneuver that not a single triple was attempted on Einstein (comm issues didn't help either). People seem to be discounting a long+long+wide balance because it's too risky. I'm just saying that in many cases, especially with these robots, wide+wide+long or wide+wide+wide is risky as well.

Gregor 15-06-2012 11:44

Re: 2012 IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iVanDuzer (Post 1174087)
I also know that 1241's bridge balancer was untested at GTRE, or that it was deemed unreliable enough to not risk a shot at a regional title (the Coop almost-triple on Newton proves as much). If teams have good and *proven* stingers, then long bots can definitely hang with long bots. And I'd be surprised if the majority of competitive long bots don't have a stinger.

I would hardly count the failed triple on the coop bridge on Newton as an indication that 1241 can't triple. I doubt that it was planned.

Ekcrbe 15-06-2012 11:52

Re: 2012 IRI Predictions
 
Watching that from the stands, it was pretty much solid and then someone moved, trying to go back to just a regular coop. If they were trying to, I think that balance would have stuck.

iVanDuzer 15-06-2012 12:44

Re: 2012 IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gregor01 (Post 1174089)
I would hardly count the failed triple on the coop bridge on Newton as an indication that 1241 can't triple. I doubt that it was planned.

I heard that it was planned by the participating teams. Also, I wasn't saying that 1241 can't triple, just that they haven't shown that they can yet. And for teams that rely on scouting (like both 2056 and 188), what you say you can do doesn't matter; it's what you actually do on the field that counts.

Regardless, I still say that people are discounting long robots or perhaps overemphasizing the importance of wide robots in terms of triple balances. After all, if there's anywhere robots will hang impossibly far off the end of the bridge, it's IRI.

Quote:

Watching that from the stands, it was pretty much solid and then someone moved, trying to go back to just a regular coop. If they were trying to, I think that balance would have stuck.
Ahh, ok. I was watching from the Archimedes stands, so obviously my view of the event was rather poor. It was looking rather shaky even before they all slid off, but once again, I didn't have that great of an angle.

AdamHeard 15-06-2012 12:48

Re: 2012 IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ekcrbe (Post 1174092)
Watching that from the stands, it was pretty much solid and then someone moved, trying to go back to just a regular coop. If they were trying to, I think that balance would have stuck.

Wait, so someone tried to triple on the co-op bridge in a qualifying match?

JosephC 15-06-2012 12:58

Re: 2012 IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 1174106)
Wait, so someone tried to triple on the co-op bridge in a qualifying match?

Yes.

AdamHeard 15-06-2012 13:06

Re: 2012 IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JosephC (Post 1174108)
Yes.

That seems like a horrible idea that is likely just going to end up blowing the co-op points for the entire alliance.

Were they successful?

Ekcrbe 15-06-2012 13:10

Re: 2012 IRI Predictions
 
As an observer, I think what actually happened was that 1241's partner died or had difficulty getting on the bridge, so they went to help. After pushing them up and trying to drive away, 1241 remained partially on the bridge and stayed there as the bridge leveled, hanging surprisingly far off. After a few seconds (Okay it felt like a few seconds, I have no idea how long it was), someone (610?) began jumping back and forth, and 1241 fell off just before the match ended.

It was most likely not planned, and nobody was really sure if the triple would have even counted had it remained.

I was actually sitting immediately behind 1241 in the stands, and they all freaked out when it happened, so I could be misremembering.

LeelandS 15-06-2012 13:12

Re: 2012 IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 1174110)
That seems like a horrible idea that is likely just going to end up blowing the co-op points for the entire alliance.

Were they successful?

They were unsuccessful, though they were astoundingly close. From what I could tell over the webcast, they pretty much had it set in place before somebody moved and collapsed the whole thing.

I don't know why exactly they did it, but when 1241 boarded the co-op bridge, I can say it was the most confusing moment of the season for me.

akoscielski3 15-06-2012 13:14

Re: 2012 IRI Predictions
 
Canadians these days...
;)

Jay O'Donnell 15-06-2012 14:13

Re: 2012 IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by akoscielski3 (Post 1173994)
The EH Team is gonna win it all. ;)

I saw them compete on Archimedes, and I have no doubt that if they team up they'll be a tough team to beat. No matter what this is going to be fun to watch!

AlecMataloni 15-06-2012 15:02

Re: 2012 IRI Predictions
 
Here's a video of the attempt:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMYzl...1&feature=plcp

DISCLAIMER: My team was not informed of the decision made by our partners. You can imagine the drive team's confusion when they saw what was happening.

Jay O'Donnell 15-06-2012 15:19

Re: 2012 IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlecMataloni (Post 1174129)
Here's a video of the attempt:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMYzl...1&feature=plcp

DISCLAIMER: My team was not informed of the decision made by our partners. You can imagine the drive team's confusion when they saw what was happening.

Thanks for the video this really clears up what happened. It doesn't seemed to have been planned, but a strange situation nonetheless.

Jay O'Donnell 15-06-2012 15:27

Re: 2012 IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by akoscielski3 (Post 1174138)
Is this suppose to show the Triple Co-op attempt? cause I cant see it...

Yes it is, actually it's the entire match video, that ends with the attempted triple co-op


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:36.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi