![]() |
2012 MARC predictions
Heres my prediction:
1 469 67 2834 862 F 2 548 33 308 1243 W 3 3322 1718 1732 240 SF 4 3098 1918 1504 1528 QF 5 1023 68 2851 461 SF 6 2337 3357 245 830 QF 7 51 48 494 2137 QF 8 123 70 503 191 QF Quote:
|
Re: 2012 MARC predictions
I'd vote but it would be bais towards my team =P. I am slightly curious as to the reasoning behind your predictions. If you could give a short blurb on why you put these teams where they are that'd be great =)
|
Re: 2012 MARC predictions
67: Coop/Hybrid kings let them into #1
469: See MSC, Troy, and Waterford 33: Com problems fixed, amazing at all aspects of game 3098: Constant improvement, key shooter and wide 3322: Key/stinger/wide 51: Key/auto/wide but no stinger drags them this far down 2337: Long keeps them this low but key/stinger 1023: Key/wide/stinger but no bump 1718: Key/wide/auto no stinger and has consistency problems 1918: No mans land shooting often/wide/auto but not overly consistent shooting 123: My dark horse, key shooting improves and surprise everyone 48: Long but drops this far do to being out of state and unknown, will surprise people once they have to pay attention in elims, steal this low 494: Key/Wide 70: Picked by twin 68: Improved tremendously for worlds but no stinger and fear of bump 245: Key/wide/auto 3539: Stinger needed along with bump crossing, long keeps them this low but if they can triple will round out this alliance perfectly 1732: Dropped this far due to out of state another wide bot 2834: Wide desperately needed, auto and fender shooting 830: See MSC 2851: Need another wide bot, great auto, steal due to being somewhat unknowns still 910: Secret stinger added after Troy (guessing) is needed plus wide and auto 862: Needed solid defense/stinger makes up for being long 308: Auto/ability to be wide (forgotten by a few) but inconsistency keeps them so low Possible longest post for me so far, again no offence to other teams, I was on drive team and did not watch all of you play. Also I will be amazed if 1 of these is right! |
Re: 2012 MARC predictions
Quote:
|
Re: 2012 MARC predictions
Quote:
I would not be surprised if one of these alliances actually comes true--they're all built to complement one another. Of course 67-469 is a likely duo, but I could see 2851 being a sleeper to come back around to the 1st alliance; we've already seen that alliance at Waterford--and chemistry can be even more valuable than skill in the eliminations. |
Re: 2012 MARC predictions
I'd just like to throw in that even with a long bot, you don't need a stinger to balance. During the elims on Newton with 330 and 639 I believe 330 used their stinger only once, with each balance taking around 5 seconds.
(330 is long and 639 is wide. 68 is also wide.) |
Re: 2012 MARC predictions
We will have a stinger for MARC and also we fixed our shooter and it works perfectly
|
Re: 2012 MARC predictions
Quote:
I can't wait to see how new drivers effects some of the previously invincible teams. Only time will tell. |
Re: 2012 MARC predictions
Quote:
|
Re: 2012 MARC predictions
Quote:
|
Re: 2012 MARC predictions
Quote:
|
Re: 2012 MARC predictions
Quote:
With drivers, I feel like we're at a slight disadvantage, our robot is at HQ for awhile with only the practice bot around. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi