![]() |
A little off-topic - Lightning and Electrical Components
Hey there, I've been curious about this for a while and I know you guys in this community are probably pretty qualified to answer this question. I'm not sure if this is the right sub-forum, if not, I'd be happy to move it to somewhere more fitting (Electrical seemed the most relevant).
I'm wondering about lightning strikes, as to why people (At least some people who I know) are so concerned about surges and power outages damaging electrical components. Specifically (And I think this is due to the misconceptions that a lot of people have about computers - imagine 'ohhh, shiny'), people seem to think that computers can be seriously damaged by lightning strikes. Now, my natural instinct is to say that this is not accurate, plainly because of all the measures we have in place to prevent such things from happening (Eg. Breakers, Surge protectors in transformers, surge protectors in power bars, fuses in appliances, etc.), but is my instinct not correct in this situation? And if so, what are the actual chances that such damage can occur? (For example, is a surge to the power brick on my laptop capable of affecting the laptop itself because the laptop is capable of powering itself with it's battery) If my instinct is correct, I'd love to understand what exactly goes on in the electrical components (Eg. Surge protectors, breakers) to stop surges from damaging components. I'm not a huge electrical guy, so layman's terms are appreciated :) Thanks, Joel |
Re: A little off-topic - Lightning and Electrical Components
The odds are low...but the risk is real. Lighting packs a real wallop. Search google images for computer lightning damage.
|
Re: A little off-topic - Lightning and Electrical Components
It is late and my brain isn't functioning 100%, but yes surges from lightning strikes can and will damage electrical components, especially semi-conductors. Just a few pictures below I found from the internet show some possible damage in a computer.
![]() ![]() While you are correct in that there are a lot of protections in place in the electrical system to prevent damage, transients (short lived changes essentially) due to power outages/surges, lightning, electrostatic discharge (ESD), etc. can be very difficult to protect against in all situations. Most components have an absolute maximum rated voltage that can be applied to it. Exceed this and you may have a latent issue that will show up years down the line, or immediate destruction. Lighting for example will introduce an extremely large transient that will destroy pretty much any component not specifically designed to suppress lightning. Transient voltage suppressors/protectors are generally used for protecting against ESD and lightning up to a rated level (standardized) and generally use the properties of various electrical components to create a low resistance path away from the sensitive electronics. The wikipedia page on Surge protectors is actually not too bad and provides a starting off point I suppose. Of course I'm assuming some basic knowledge of electricity here. Feel free to ask any questions or whatever, even over PM! I'm probably halfway incoherent since it is past my bed time, but I'll be happy to respond tomorrow. |
Re: A little off-topic - Lightning and Electrical Components
Quote:
|
Re: A little off-topic - Lightning and Electrical Components
Lightning suppression can do only so much. We're talking about mega-voltage and amps of current moving around really sensitive electronics.
Today's digital electronics operate with very low-voltage/low-power, primarily to preserve battery life and reduce thermal issues. There are devices in the cRIO operating on 1.2V power supplies whose can fail with transient voltage spikes less than fractions of a volt for less than milliseconds. Radiation coming through the Earth's atmosphere and magnetic field can upset circuits and wreck havoc with programs if not corrected. Small voltage spikes can literally cook IC circuits causing permanent damage. When circuit boards are being assembled and handled with such parts, serious precautions are taken to avoid ESD damage: controlled humidity, conductive bags, containers, benches, floors and garments, wrist straps, air ionizers, etc. Having proper grounding and adequate transient protection on power inputs (or better, UPS systems) is essential for protecting against lightning. But you can kill your electronics pretty easily with a static spark in the winter too. |
Re: A little off-topic - Lightning and Electrical Components
Quote:
Most failures are manufacturing defects. One example were electrolytic capacitors made with counterfeit electrolyete. Most other failures are speculted into "it must be a surge". Your telco's CO, radio stations, munitions dumps, etc all suffer direct lightning strikes without damage. The solution has been well understood for over 100 years. But is not promoted by advertising, retail salesmen, and hearsay. So most have never heard of the well proven solution. Most have only heard of another completely different device, also called a surge protector, that does not claim to protect from typically destructive surges. Some numbers follow. A destructive surges is a microsecond event. A connection from the cloud to distant earthborned charges. First that current exists at the exact same time everywhere in that path. Then much later, something in that path fails. To be damaged, an appliance must have one incoming surge wire. And other completely different outgoing wire. That is electricity. It does not enter an appliance, do damage and just stop as so many are told to believe. Fuses, circuit breakers, a UPS, or anything else that might stop a surge take milliseconds to respond. Surges are done in microseconds. Nothing stops a surge. As in nothing. Nothing inside the house absorbs a surge. Surges are hundreds of thousands of joules. View numbers on the most popular protectors or UPS. They only claim to absorb hundreds of joules. A surge easily blows through such devices. Protection is always about where energy is absorbed. Destructively inside a building. Or harmlessly outside. Electronics atop the Empire State Building may suffer 23 direct strikes annually without damage. The number was 40 for the WTC. Routine is to suffer a direct strike without damage. But that means relearning a concept originally taught in elementary school science. Franklin's lightning rod. Lightning seeks earth ground. A best electrical connection was via wooden church steeples. Yes, wood is an electrical conductor. But not a very good conductor. So lightning, maybe 20,000 amps, will create a high voltage in that wood. From high school physics. 20,000 amps times a high voltage is high energy. High energy dissipates in wood resulting in steeple damage. Franklin simply put a lightning rod on that steeple. Does the rod do protection? Of course not. The rod is only a connecting device to earth. 20,000 amps will create a near zero voltage due to a connection (a wire) to earth ground. 20,000 amps times a near zero voltage is near zero energy. Near zero energy dissipates on that connection. Hundreds of thosuands of joules dissipate harmlessly in earth. Most important is the earth ground and its connection - not the rod. A lighting strike to AC wires far down the street is a direct strike to all household appliances. The incoming path IF that surge is permitted to go hunting for earth inside the building. Nothing will stop that destructive hunt if a surge is inside. As in nothing. Informed consumers and all faciliitles that cannot have damage, instead, earth a 'whole house' protector. With a connection that is low impedance (ie 'less than 10 feet') to earth. Wall receptacle safety ground obviously is not an earth ground (excessive impedance, much more than 10 feet, etc). A surge connected to earth via a wire (cable TV, satellite dish) or connected via a 'whole house' protector (AC electric, telephone) need not enter a building. A surge connected to earth before entering does not hunt for earth destructively via household appliances. Protection was always about energy not even inside. But advertising says a 2 centimeter part inside a magic box will stop or absorb that energy. Nothing inside will stop, block, or absorb a destructive surge. Once inside, that surge will find earth destructively via appliances. A minimal 'whole house' protector is rated to connect 50,000 amps harmlessly to earth. Then no surge is inside. Even that protector remains functional after a direct lightning strike - as numbers confirm. Protection has been performed that way in every facility that cannot have damage - even 100 years ago. Protecting the building is about earthing lightning rods. Protecting appliances is about earth incoming utility wires; either with a hardwire or with one 'whole house' protector. Earthing (not a protector) is the most important component of any protection system. A lightning rod is only as good as its earth ground. A protector is only as effective as its earth ground. Most educated by advertising do not even understand why the art of protection and most all attention should be refocused on earthing. Do not even know the best protector costs about $1 per protected appliance. |
Re: A little off-topic - Lightning and Electrical Components
Quote:
Surge protectors can absorb hundreds of joules... but redirect much more. By the way, do you happen to be the westom at LinuxQuestions.org? |
Re: A little off-topic - Lightning and Electrical Components
Quote:
Once that current is inside, it will hunt for earth destructively via appliances. An adjacent protector can only do two things: 1) block that current or 2) absorb that energy. Many have observed appliance damage because an adjacent protector earthed that current destructively through nearby appliances. Protector adjacent to an appliance can block what three miles of sky could not? Or somehow absorb hundreds of thousands of joules? Protection is always about where energy dissipates. Always. What happens to a 100 amp surge at a protector and appliance? 50 feet of AC wire might be less than 0.2 ohms resistance to the breaker box. But the relevant term is repeated often: 'low impedance'. That same wire may be 120 ohms impedance. 100 amps times 120 ohms means a protector and appliance is at something less than 12,000 volts. Why would a surge find other paths to earth destructively via nearby appliances? 12,000 volts. Excessive impedance. The adajcent protector can only block that current or absorb that energy. Otherwise it an only divert that surge detructively via appliances. Fortunately, most surges that destroy grossly undersized protectors are too tiny to harm adjacent appliances. Low impedance is why a 'whole house' protector makes a 'less than 10 foot' connection to earth. No sharp wire bends. Ground wire not inside metallic conduit. Ground wire separated from all other wires. That ground connection - not the protector - is most important for protection. That adjacent protector only says it will absorb how many joules? Where is any number for protection? Does not exist. They need you to believe it somehow stops or absorbs surges. Otherwise it can only divert that surge detructively into any nearby appliance. Only item that does protection - single point earth ground. Only effective protetors connect short to and can divert energy harmlessly to earth. Protection is always about where hundreds of thousands of joules dissipate. Always. |
Re: A little off-topic - Lightning and Electrical Components
An old saying in the ham radio community is "the only thing predictable about lightning is it is unpredictable". While broadcast stations with tall towers do have protection to try and prevent damage that doesn't always work. Lightning has a few particular issues that make damage control difficult. We are talking kiloamps with rise times in the few microseconds and millions of volts. Mechanical devices like breakers and fuses will not respond to that kind event. Should a strike occur near your device, the resulting pulse can jump across the protecting device and still take out a lot of stuff. The pictures above are nothing, they were likely caused by a component failure or power supply fault. A lightning strike would have left a burned hole in the board.
Remember Ohm's Law. Calculate out the voltage developed across one ohm at 40,000 amps. So a bolt strikes your phone line in the backyard, roars up the line to your house and the first thing it encounters is a lighting block that has one side tied to a #10 wire that ties to you cold water supply pipe. The #10 is .001 ohms per foot and is ten feet long, the copper supply pipe is .0001 ohms per foot and is 20 feet long before it touches earth outside your house and then it reaches dry ground. Assuming that the arrestor doesn't disintegrate and ignoring that the water in the pipe turns to steam instantaneously and that the #10 wire doesn't vaporize, several thousand volts will be developed across the wire and pipe. Once outside, the ground dissipates the current but there will be a potential spread across your front lawn. If you are standing out there with your legs spread out, there could be a difference in potential between your two feet of several thousand volts. I have seen lightning bypass the protectors and travel on the outside of a coaxial line and then jump into a transmitter and take out the final amp. I have seen lightning come down a tower that is grounded, jump six feet to a house, strike the water pipes and blow all the fixtures in the house as the water turns to steam at high pressure. I have been asked to repair TVs, computers, and VCRs that were taken out in a nearby strike. Some only needed a fuse, others, there was nothing left of the boards near the power cord. Just charred circuits and a lot of residue on the case where the components that blew up were left. Even on Sears, when it gets struck by lightning (several times a year, 50-100) the current travels through the building, down the 120 stories to the ground and then presumably to the Chicago River a half block away. If you look at the video I linked a few weeks ago, the lightning protection is not visible because the entire structure is the protection. Everything you see is bonded to building steel. |
Re: A little off-topic - Lightning and Electrical Components
If you want to completely protect electronic equipment from lightning, unplug it and put the device in the middle of the room, as far away from anything conductive as you can. This is probably only necessary when there are clouds in the sky.
|
Re: A little off-topic - Lightning and Electrical Components
Quote:
However, if you read on in that Wikipedia article I linked to, the idea of using lasers and rockets to trigger the lightning along a known path sounds interesting. |
Re: A little off-topic - Lightning and Electrical Components
A lot of awesome responses, I learnt a lot! Thank you guys.
|
Re: A little off-topic - Lightning and Electrical Components
Quote:
On the subject of lots of electronics, take a look at this Emirates A380 getting struck. Pretty neat looking, and obviously the airplane is designed to keep these strikes from disabling any systems. |
Re: A little off-topic - Lightning and Electrical Components
|
Re: A little off-topic - Lightning and Electrical Components
Interesting story on planes. As I was talking to Dean at the Einstein weekend, he mentioned his plane was struck recently, taking off a small section of the wing tip.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi