![]() |
Re: Suggestion on What to use on battery Terminals
The above are great suggestions for engineering solutions to mitigate the terminal-loosening problem. You might also want to employ some non-engineering solutions:
|
Re: Suggestion on What to use on battery Terminals
Quote:
Also, I don't use shrink wrap when securing power connections. I don't need to because the wiring I do conveniently goes into terminals. I don't use this on a robot either; my wiring remains stationary. I only use shrink wrap for wrapping wires when I solder two different wires together. For a battery terminal? I agree that convenient access is important. But if you choose to go the role of electrical tape, I'd suggest securing the electrical tape with duct tape or something similar. |
Re: Suggestion on What to use on battery Terminals
James,
I recommend against duct tape because frequently the gray/silver types actually have conducting coatings. Lifting batteries by the wires is also bad practice from a safety standpoint. The battery is actually designed to take a variety of different terminal types from posts to tapped blocks. As such, each of the terminals merely fit over round pins and solder/molten lead is then poured over the joint. The battery is finished with a colored filler, either black or red. Neither the internal joint nor the colored filler is designed to carry the weight of the battery. Al |
Re: Suggestion on What to use on battery Terminals
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion on What to use on battery Terminals
Three words: Giant heat shrink.
|
Re: Suggestion on What to use on battery Terminals
Quote:
However, with the battery terminals, it's a different situation entirely. Even if none of your wire is exposed, the entire terminal is exposed, and it does NOT have any protection from a circuit breaker at that point. So, if the terminals are exposed, you run a very dangerous risk. The battery can put out hundreds of amps (Al can probably give you a better upper-bound on the batteries than I can, he has more experience!). When surrounded by your typical aluminum robot with students using metal wrenches, pliers, and screw drivers, there is every possibility of shorting out the battery terminals if they aren't completely insulated. The result, in that case, is the terminals welding themselves to whatever shorted them. This is an extremely dangerous situation. That is why inspectors are extremely cautious and strict when it comes to the battery terminals and the main power routing all the way up to the PD board. If you show up at one of my regionals and your batteries have uncovered terminals that I see, I will literally stand in your pit until you fix them. So please, make sure you completely insulate all connections that are NOT protected by a breaker, at minimum! These are the most dangerous connectors, and also generally the largest and most exposed ones on the robot! |
Re: Suggestion on What to use on battery Terminals
The battery is capable of 600 amps at full charge. No matter where the battery is or at what stage in wiring it might, one of the terminals should always insulated. Jon's practice at regionals is recommended for all inspectors and teams. I will watch you insulate bare terminals while I carry on inspection or I will do it for you.
600 amps flowing through the internal resistance of the battery (0.011 ohms) works out to nearly 4000 watts. Yes, it is enough to weld a dropped tool (or wire or a necklace, bracelet or watch band) in place across the terminals. The result is a lot of heat, possible flame, escaping gas and acid, ruptured case and in rare cases, explosion. |
Re: Suggestion on What to use on battery Terminals
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi