Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Regional Competitions (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   2013 SVR (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=108854)

DampRobot 06-04-2013 10:08

Re: 2013 SVR
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Basel A (Post 1257725)
I got the same thing, but you're missing 1868 seeded 2nd at 9-1, as well as a number of 7-3 teams that would seed higher than 973 or 670.

Note that this is basically guaranteed to be wrong, but all teams should be within a match or two.

You're right, they should seed 2nd (!!!). I missed the fact that they were playing 4 matches today. This will really turn the regional back into anyone's game, they haven't been playing very well (inaccurate shooting) and could be eliminated fairly early even if paired with a team like Pink.

While the regional winners will almost certainly be 254-118, this opens up the finals (and most likely two championship slots).

VioletElizabeth 06-04-2013 10:39

Re: 2013 SVR
 
Part of our inaccurate shooting is that our driver uses the first shot to line up if we're shooting from the corner, as we have at best a camera to help with lining up; no targeting code. (I'm not actually there, so I can't tell you if there is a camera, I just know it's an option.) The rest is just the kind of error that makes me shrug and go, "I have no clue why that happened."

I agree that we are not quite on the level of many of the really strong teams at SVR this year. I saw the lists of who was coming and thought that we might not even get to elims at all this year, except as maybe 3rd team on an alliance, despite having been finalists the last 4 years. We always play the best we can, and I guess that and a handful of luck paid off (so far. *knocks on wood*)

P.S. We could lose match 91, we're playing 973. However, my match predicting method consists of, "Is this team one I know & was scary last time I saw their bot? Yes: Might lose. No: Could win." and is therefore pretty inaccurate.

aditya29 06-04-2013 11:44

Re: 2013 SVR
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VioletElizabeth (Post 1257755)
However, my match predicting method consists of, "Is this team one I know & was scary last time I saw their bot? Yes: Might lose. No: Could win." and is therefore pretty inaccurate.

Haha +1. While many people make predictions like this for quals matches, it doesn't work too well at this event because of the depth/strength of the field. The 2nd/3rd tiers of robots behind the superstars will make allllll the difference in elims, as they've already been impacting quals a great deal. Really curious to see how FCS/defense will play out in elims alongside the high-powered bots.

This will be intense, hope everyone's ready for a wild ride!

AdamHeard 06-04-2013 11:46

Re: 2013 SVR
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DampRobot (Post 1257748)
While the regional winners will almost certainly be 254-118, this opens up the finals (and most likely two championship slots).

Almost certainly?

Bill_B 06-04-2013 12:22

Re: 2013 SVR
 
reverse camera angles in the web feed? yikes.

VioletElizabeth 06-04-2013 13:08

Re: 2013 SVR
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by aditya29 (Post 1257762)
Haha +1. While many people make predictions like this for quals matches, it doesn't work too well at this event because of the depth/strength of the field. The 2nd/3rd tiers of robots behind the superstars will make allllll the difference in elims, as they've already been impacting quals a great deal. Really curious to see how FCS/defense will play out in elims alongside the high-powered bots.

This will be intense, hope everyone's ready for a wild ride!

Obviously not our scouting for real. :p I'm just making my own predictions from 9 time zones away, so that I can figure out which matches to bite my nails over. (Figuratively.)

Wheeeee! I'm ready for a wild ride!

MooreteP 06-04-2013 15:37

Re: 2013 SVR
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DampRobot (Post 1257747)
Pink is projected to lose their last match against a certain orange and black team, which will lose them first seed. I doubt that 254 would pick Pink first; I believe 118 is a fundamentally more consistent and beter robot with an opr to prove it.

You were right about the match, but you will now wear Pink. :)

MooreteP 06-04-2013 15:43

Re: 2013 SVR
 
Great second pick for the 5th alliance.
You are now the FunkyPinkHats.

Gregor 06-04-2013 15:48

Re: 2013 SVR
 
Alliances:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gregor (Post 1257794)
Silicon Vally

254-118-1967
1868*-973-4159
971-192-604
1662-148-3598
233-100-846
649-1388-114
2144-670-840
115-2489-766

*1662, 971 declined 1868

Predictions:

1d8
2d7
3d6
5d4

1d5
3d2

1d3

Jon Jack 06-04-2013 17:14

Re: 2013 SVR
 
Is the webcast down for everyone else?

Starke 06-04-2013 17:14

Re: 2013 SVR
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Jack (Post 1257824)
Is the webcast down for everyone else?

Down here.

MrTechCenter 06-04-2013 17:15

Re: 2013 SVR
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Jack (Post 1257824)
Is the webcast down for everyone else?

604 said that their computer blue-screened.

androb4 06-04-2013 17:16

Re: 2013 SVR
 
No match updates either..

SamMullen 06-04-2013 17:17

Re: 2013 SVR
 
Yeah, Im only seeing a 604 Quixilver logo now. Anyone know an alternate stream?

ENeyman 06-04-2013 17:18

Re: 2013 SVR
 
It's back!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi