![]() |
FRC Blogged: - Motor Controllers
Found here: http://www.usfirst.org/roboticsprogr.../blog-10-03-12
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blogged: - Motor Controllers
I like this new Frank guy. He knows what the people want to hear.
More IFI is best IFI. |
Re: FRC Blogged: - Motor Controllers
Nothing about the Talon? I hope it becomes FRC legal.
|
Re: FRC Blogged: - Motor Controllers
Quote:
Teams are Beta Testing it. |
Re: FRC Blogged: - Motor Controllers
The post mentions a conformal coating - am I right to hope that this would reduce their vulnerability to stray metal shavings?
|
Re: FRC Blogged: - Motor Controllers
What is the benefit of removing the firmware current limit? This seems like great way to blow a lot more Jags.
|
Re: FRC Blogged: - Motor Controllers
Good to hear!
|
Re: FRC Blogged: - Motor Controllers
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blogged: - Motor Controllers
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blogged: - Motor Controllers
Props to TI for making the transition seamless!
|
Re: FRC Blogged: - Motor Controllers
Quote:
I am hoping that this can be solved by enabling the overcurrent protection by default, but allowing it to be disabled via CAN if a team knows what they are doing, or they do not care if the Jaguar resets. This way, if it does reset, the overcurrent protection will be reenabled when it does. |
Re: FRC Blogged: - Motor Controllers
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blogged: - Motor Controllers
Quote:
We are confident these changes (conformal coating and firmware changes) will make the Jaguar perceived match robustness much higher. The firmware current limit caused Jags to cut power to motors when they just didn't need to. We have had extensive technical conversations with the engineers responsible for the jaguar development and are confident this is a positive change. Paul |
Re: FRC Blogged: - Motor Controllers
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blogged: - Motor Controllers
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi