Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?
 

For Gopro cameras the Wifi capability is an addon that can be removed for field usage. Otherwise it allows you to control the camera with a smart phone or even stream video.

Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?
 

Here is pertinent 2012 season Q&A. The add-on camera would have counted as part of the total robot cost.
This is the only direct reference I found.

Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?
 

I lost my go-pro skiing, getting it crushed by a robot is WAY cooler n that

Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?
 

The models we use are storage to SD card only. It's good to know we'll be able to shoot video this season. We were up against the budget cap last season, so we would not have been able to slip a camera onboard.

Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?
 

From a common sense point of view:

On board cameras during real competitions provide a great public relations aspect to promoting FIRST and FRC. My thoughts:

• Restrictions on WiFi are certainly reasonable
• Restrictions against using the recorded footage for a competitive advantage within the same competition are reasonable (but hard to enforce, like many other rules.)
• Including camera in bot weight, height, volume limit is reasonable
• General safety considerations are reasonable
• Disallowing due to battery is unreasonable
• Disallowing due to budget limitation is marginal, but this should not usually be an issue anyway, since cameras can be had for <$400.

Of course the GDC's answer is final, but I would hope the rules are arranged so that we don't have to jump through hoops like getting waivers to get good video, like our Duluth Double Shot:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2KIVicKIOk

Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?
 

Most of the discussion I've found from searching deals with using cameras for recording for post-match use. But it doesn't appear that there are any limits (other than those mentioned to pass inspection) regarding using something like a smartphone as a camera / processor for image processing and tracking and then feeding that information to the cRIO. Assuming we can find a smartphone for <$400, is it legal to use it as a custom circuit?
Also, regarding the $400 limit, I assume it would need to be the cost without an associated data plan subsidy which makes them pretty expensive; however, since refurbished phones are so readily available for <$400 (especially older models), what do you think about using the advertised cost from OEM's or major re-sellers of a non-subsidized refurbished phone as the cost for accounting purposes?

Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?
 

FYI, the latest generation of GoPro cameras (Hero3) has WiFi built in. It can be disabled (and must be on an FRC robot, obviously).

Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?
 

Gary, those are great questions. I'd also throw into that mix -- how would you interface the phone to the cRIO? Seems like you may be able to get away with the cheapest/smallest Arduino setup possible that converts USB data packets to Ethernet packets ... but maybe you have something else in mind? Seems like you'd also have a great setup to siphon & store any images from the USB onto an SD card for post-match use.

A phone seems like the perfect self-contained processor...

Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?
 

That was neat... made me sort of dizzy though :ahh:

:p

Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?
 

Gary,
I would view a phone as a custom circuit/outboard processor/computing device using it's own embedded battery under the robot rules as they stand. All wireless would have to be shown to be disabled to pass inspection as well as only providing power to a peripheral through the USB connection. As with any computing device/custom circuit, it must be weighed with the robot and be securely fastened. Duct tape is not a fastener for those thinking of easy solutions.
Al

Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?
 

Thanks Al. Any thoughts on using refurbished phone prices for allowable cost?

Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?
 

We use GoPro HD Hero Naked.
http://gopro.com/cameras/hd-hero-naked-camera/
Got an extra battery pack for the back and a 32 GB chip. That allows 4 hours of battery, and 6 hours of storage.

Looks like it may be discontinued, as GoPro.com does not carry it anymore. Great thing about the HD Hero Naked is that it is NOT wi-fi capable.