Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Extra Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=68)
-   -   pic: Another Team 691 Swerve Module (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=110151)

Garret 20-12-2012 22:42

pic: Another Team 691 Swerve Module
 

MichaelBick 20-12-2012 22:43

Re: pic: Another Team 691 Swerve Module
 
How thick is that tread?

Garret 21-12-2012 02:35

Re: pic: Another Team 691 Swerve Module
 
The tread is 1.5" thick on a custom wheel 3" wheel. The wheel can be swapped for a dead-axle 3" colson if I change the shaft from 5/8" to 1/2".

Chris is me 21-12-2012 14:40

Re: pic: Another Team 691 Swerve Module
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Garret (Post 1203658)
The tread is 1.5" thick on a custom wheel 3" wheel. The wheel can be swapped for a dead-axle 3" colson if I change the shaft from 5/8" to 1/2".

Any reason you can't run 3/8ths and use the COTS Colson hub? I'd be wary of using the super thin roller bearings in a drivetrain application.

AdamHeard 23-12-2012 22:41

Re: pic: Another Team 691 Swerve Module
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 1203872)
Any reason you can't run 3/8ths and use the COTS Colson hub? I'd be wary of using the super thin roller bearings in a drivetrain application.

Why?

Is the COTS hub you're referring to the stock delrin bushings, or the WCP hub?

Garret 24-12-2012 00:50

Re: pic: Another Team 691 Swerve Module
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 1203872)
Any reason you can't run 3/8ths and use the COTS Colson hub? I'd be wary of using the super thin roller bearings in a drivetrain application.

Sorry for not responding earlier, there isn't any reason that prevents me from doing that, it would simply require the hole to be drilled out and the shaft replaced with a 3/8" bolt.

I hadn't done something like that initially because I was testing out the feasibility (from a design point of view) of having the module hold itself together as if it were one single piece. In this case the axle was actually a tube that fit into counter-bores on the two side plates, the intent was to make the shaft a structural member. This was done with the rest of the module by having the parts fit into slots or holes that would hold their positions instead of fasteners.

For this module only the 2 larger bolts going through the top are necessary to hold the module together and the other large bolt on the bottom just helps "strengthen" the shaft if the game required it (bumps, falling, etc...).

Chris is me 24-12-2012 13:53

Re: pic: Another Team 691 Swerve Module
 
You can still do a 3/8 tube axle and just tap the ends. I like the idea of using the bottom axle to make the module more rigid. You can't be too rigid with this kind of design!

Garret 25-12-2012 00:00

Re: pic: Another Team 691 Swerve Module
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 1204721)
You can still do a 3/8 tube axle and just tap the ends. I like the idea of using the bottom axle to make the module more rigid. You can't be too rigid with this kind of design!

I hadn't thought of doing that, that would actually be quite elegant if it is strong enough.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:57.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi