Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Chassis weight (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=110931)

DMike 10-01-2013 17:41

Chassis weight
 
Would anyone have an idea what the average weight would be for a mostly completed chassis. Frame, gearboxes,wheels and motors.

treffk 10-01-2013 18:26

Re: Chassis weight
 
It all depends on your design, drive train and what you are hoping to accomplish for this years game.

For example my students have calcuated that in motors alone we are going to have about 50 pounds of weight with their current design.

If you are just wanting a defensive bot you wouldn't need nearly as many motors or an elaborately designed chasis. If you are wanting to climb or shoot depending how how you design these systems they could also use motors and gearboxes thus changing the weight for every single team. It's difficult to predict an average weight because everyone's and every teams thought processes are different along with their skill sets.

DMike 10-01-2013 18:52

Re: Chassis weight
 
Thanks for the info, our group has been working on a direct drive mecanum system. The frame, gearboxes, motors and wheels weigh 47 lbs with a perimeter of 108 inches. I am not sure we want to cheese out the frame any more than it is. At this point it only exists in SolidWorks.

treffk 10-01-2013 19:29

Re: Chassis weight
 
That's okay! Ours only consists in to scale drawings and a 1/3 scale cardboard cutout.

pmangels17 10-01-2013 23:15

Re: Chassis weight
 
Our drive generally averages around 30-40 pounds. However, in 2011 we built a crab drive (with freshman builders and one sophomore, might I add) that weighed approximately 50 pounds. However, you could easily make a lighter custom one or a lighter one using the kitbot. It all depends on your goals.

Donut 10-01-2013 23:58

Re: Chassis weight
 
I think the average is in the 30-40 lb range. We did Mecanum last year with very large standoffs and full size Toughboxes for each wheel (read: overkill) that weighed in at a whopping 60 lbs for the frame, wheels, gearboxes, and motors. This year we're trying out the Nanotubes from Andymark and the new Mecanums from VexPro, I think it should weigh in at around 30 lbs for it all.

Mecanum systems will tend to be a little on the heavier side due to significantly heavier wheels and an extra pair of transmissions. Direct drive should help keep the weight down some without chain or belt needed. Are you using stock gearboxes from Andymark or VexPro, or are these custom? There are quite a few low weight transmissions out there now that can save you some weight.

akoscielski3 11-01-2013 00:09

Re: Chassis weight
 
My Chassis' on average weigh about 40lbs. Try to keep it under that.

pmangels17 11-01-2013 06:31

Re: Chassis weight
 
The shifter transmissions we ordered this year were around 8 pounds with a motor and shifting cylinder installed. However, we took off the side plates and replaced it with the star shaft that comes in the kitbot, and dropped a pund already between the two. THere are also some extraneous mounting brackets that could be cut, and some holes in the side plate (or thinned out areas) that could be taken out for more savings, but we will probably keep the plates stock. We are only using to drive transmissions this year, so we should be okay. Transmissions make up a huge part of your weight, so consider your power distirbution wisely.

DMike 11-01-2013 09:00

Re: Chassis weight
 
We are planning a .080 5052 box style chassis, the gear boxes are a modulox inspired design with Aluminum gears and shafts. We went with an 8 inch wheel due to clearance issues with the 6's. The wheels alone are 10 lbs. I also made an error our weight at this point is 44 with the motors.

bardd 11-01-2013 09:12

Re: Chassis weight
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DMike (Post 1212555)
Thanks for the info, our group has been working on a direct drive mecanum system. The frame, gearboxes, motors and wheels weigh 47 lbs with a perimeter of 108 inches. I am not sure we want to cheese out the frame any more than it is. At this point it only exists in SolidWorks.

47lbs is quite heavy, though you should avoid cheesing it out just yet. First finish CADDing the whole robot and see whether you pass the weight limit or not. If you don't, it'll be better keeping the chassis heavy than cheesing it out and losing structural strength.

Peter Matteson 11-01-2013 10:11

Re: Chassis weight
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DMike (Post 1212506)
Would anyone have an idea what the average weight would be for a mostly completed chassis. Frame, gearboxes,wheels and motors.

Our lightest most basic and optimized 4 motor, 2 speed, drop center 6WD in that state was 35 lbs. Our articulated drivetrains tend to be about 10-15 lbs heavier. I would say anything in the 40 lbs range is normal.

Alan Anderson 11-01-2013 10:22

Re: Chassis weight
 
We weighed our practice chassis yesterday. Without the second gearbox, two CIMs, and cross-frame support, it came to 25 pounds. I'm guessing it'll be just under 40 pounds with all structure and motor speed controllers installed, before adding the brain box.

LightSpeedIII 11-01-2013 13:56

Re: Chassis weight
 
According to our CAD, our drivetrain should weigh approximately 25lbs.

nathan_hui 11-01-2013 14:11

Re: Chassis weight
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LightSpeedIII (Post 1213086)
According to our CAD, our drivetrain should weigh approximately 25lbs.

Did you take into account the 5 lbs or so of bolts, nuts, and washers that usually come together with a chassis? As well as each motor's actual weight?

Chris is me 11-01-2013 14:14

Re: Chassis weight
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pmangels17 (Post 1212875)
However, we took off the side plates and replaced it with the star shaft that comes in the kitbot, and dropped a pund already between the two.

I think this is a really bad idea. Those hex shafts are designed to be used as spacers, not as drive axles. That part could easily fail when you need it the most.

Spend your weight where it matters. The drivetrain matters.

pmangels17 11-01-2013 14:40

Re: Chassis weight
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 1213095)
I think this is a really bad idea. Those hex shafts are designed to be used as spacers, not as drive axles. That part could easily fail when you need it the most.

Spend your weight where it matters. The drivetrain matters.

I think I misspoke, or you misunderstood me. http://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-superoptions.htm
The black plates seen in the image on this page serve as a spacer. We replaced those with this:
http://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-2241.htm
We didn't skimp on anything like a shaft. I misspoke when I called it shaft material. We did use it as a spacer. By using it, we saved a lot of weight.
When I referred to side plates, I didn't mean the main plates, I mean the other four sides, which I replaced with spacers. I apologize for saying it wrong.

Chris is me 11-01-2013 14:51

Re: Chassis weight
 
Oh, I'm sorry, I assumed you were using the cross hex to drive a shaft. Only reason I jumped on it is because I've actually seen teams try to do that on a robot before.

LightSpeedIII 11-01-2013 14:55

Re: Chassis weight
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nathan_hui (Post 1213094)
Did you take into account the 5 lbs or so of bolts, nuts, and washers that usually come together with a chassis? As well as each motor's actual weight?

If I'm not mistaken (and I very well may be), the frame will be welded together, leaving the only bolts, nuts and washers on the frame being used to mount the gearboxes and modules. That weight should include motors, but in the event that it doesn't, adding the weight of 4 CIMs to the 25lb approximation would put it at just a little over 36 pounds.

pmangels17 11-01-2013 14:57

Re: Chassis weight
 
Oh, no. I just shuddered at the thought. But we will be machining some custom shafts for direct drive, instead of paying for the AM ones. We have two great students (I'd like to think that I'm one of them) that are good at the lathe. I am more the mill guy, and he is more the lathe guy, as we call each other. We also have a tool and dye machinist who works with us as a mentor, and he can practically make anything.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:59.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi