![]() |
Re: New England District System Proposal
FiM is up to 11 districts this year, over 200 teams.
So why, even based on last years numbers, does NE get to send 20% of their teams, MAR 12%, and FiM only 9%? And if you divide it by this year's counts, FiM is less than 9%. When will FIRST recognize that FiM created an atmosphere for growth in teams, and allow more teams to advance? We'd be up to 5 regional events by now too. |
Re: New England District System Proposal
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
Quote:
For the CMP slots, I feel that the 30:147 and 18:190 equations are going to have to change. I see a ratio of about 1:7, meaning NEF=21, MAR=14 and FiM=27. If I were in MI, I'd be howling very loudly at being punished for the successful growing of FRC. |
Re: New England District System Proposal
FiM should be on the phone figuring out why FiNE gets 12 more slots with 50 fewer teams. I saw that number and my jaw dropped.
If multiple regions are going to switch over to districts soon, why not start accurately apportioning slots? Just saying "You had x regionals for 6x slots before, so you're stuck with that number" sounds careless. However, as someone who has been watching district models developing in multiple areas, I always like to see progress. |
Re: New England District System Proposal
From the proposal:
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi