Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Regional Competitions (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   New England District System Proposal (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=110996)

PVCpirate 11-01-2013 14:58

New England District System Proposal
 
NE FIRST has posted a proposal on their website detailing the New England District Model. There are a couple of differences from the Michigan and MAR systems, I wanted to see what others think about it.

Here's a link to the post: http://www.nefirst.org/2013/01/03/nefirstdistricts/

*NOTE* I wasn't exactly sure where to post this, someone please let me know if it should be in a different forum.

Jay O'Donnell 11-01-2013 15:40

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
The main question I have is which venue in New England will they use to host at least 80 teams for the district championship. All of the current regionals in New England are the perfect size for 40-50 team regionals, but I can't see any venues that could comfortably hold 80 or more teams.

Mark McLeod 11-01-2013 15:49

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
The District Championships aren't as large as all that.
Last year the number of teams attending each were:
  • (64) teams at the FiM Championship
  • (53) teams at the MAR Championship
So, if NE FIRST is similar to MAR, then the existing venues would support what is needed.
With the point system it's easy to restrict attendance to what the venue will support.

Littleboy 11-01-2013 15:50

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
Based on current teams, how many teams will be playing in this district system?

Mark McLeod 11-01-2013 15:53

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Littleboy (Post 1213167)
Based on current teams, how many teams will be playing in this district system?

Looks like 154 in NH, VT, ME, MA, RI, CT

vs
  • (209) FiM - 132 teams when they first started and settled on a 64 team district Championship
  • (108?) MAR

Jay O'Donnell 11-01-2013 15:56

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark McLeod (Post 1213165)
The District Championships aren't as large as all that.
Last year the number of teams attending each were:
  • (64) teams at the FiM Championship
  • (53) teams at the MAR Championship
So, if NE FIRST is similar to MAR, then the existing venues would support what is needed.
With the point system it's easy to restrict attendance to what the venue will support.

From the proposal:
"We will expand the size to at least 80 teams, and provide two fields with the same amount of matches in other districts. The combined regional planning committees will form to become the District Championship Committee and bring the best that each NE event has to offer. Locations have not been decided as of this time."

I was very surprised to read this, it's a decent idea but I can't think of anywhere in New England with enough space.

Littleboy 11-01-2013 15:57

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
Then how do they get so many more spots even though they have 55 less teams than us. They have 154 teams. We have 209 teams. Yet, they get 30 teams going to CMP but we only get 18.

Mark McLeod 11-01-2013 16:04

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay Money 1058 (Post 1213174)
From the proposal:
"We will expand the size to at least 80 teams, ...

I figured "expand" meant they had to start with something smaller, but still a two field venue with pits probably means a convention center like Hartford, which does have plenty of room.

Bryce Paputa 11-01-2013 16:04

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Littleboy (Post 1213167)
Based on current teams, how many teams will be playing in this district system?

147.

What I find interesting is that the 147 team NE District sends 30 teams while the 190 team FiM District sends 18.

Jay O'Donnell 11-01-2013 16:06

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Littleboy (Post 1213176)
Then how do they get so many more spots even though they have 55 less teams than us. They have 154 teams. We have 209 teams. Yet, they get 30 teams going to CMP but we only get 18.

It may be because New England will have had 5 regionals before going to districts, while Michigan had 3 at the time. Assuming you had the full six spots per regional that qualify for championships, those two numbers do make sense. Although I do agree that more teams in an area should have more qualifiers.

IKE 11-01-2013 16:08

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
Its a good proposal. I would go as far as to say a really good proposal.

The exception I would have is that 30+ Championship slots would be going to a pool of 147 teams. If the Championship was by population I would thing that 147/2500(ish) *400=23.5 would be the reasonable number I would give NE. In other words I would give them 23 or 24 slots.

If 30 go to 147 teams, you have about a 1/5 chance. If 18/190 get to go, you have a worse than 1/10 chance...

************************************************** *****
Personally if I was FIRST I would give NE 24 slots if it was up to me.
************************************************** **
If I was NE, I would submit for the full 30 slots and have FIRST talk me down. I don't think 30 is an unreasonable number to request from a District Championship (MAR and FiM included).

PVCpirate 11-01-2013 16:51

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
To be clear this is just a proposal and I would assume many of the details will change by the time the negotiations with FIRST are completed. I like the bigger district championship, I say the more teams who can attend the event the better.

Also, I have a question: does Michigan and/or MAR grant automatic slots at the District Championship for winners of District events like it says in the proposal?

MamaSpoldi 11-01-2013 17:06

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
I agree that it looks really good.

The one thing I am disappointed in at this point is that there is only 1 EI slot but 2 RAS and 5 CA. To be fair to the importance of that award I think it should be 2 EI at least. Especially since the other awards give you points to put toward your total to compete for the other slots available but EI, CA, and RAS do not.

IKE 11-01-2013 17:39

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PVCpirate (Post 1213205)
To be clear this is just a proposal and I would assume many of the details will change by the time the negotiations with FIRST are completed. I like the bigger district championship, I say the more teams who can attend the event the better.

Also, I have a question: does Michigan and/or MAR grant automatic slots at the District Championship for winners of District events like it says in the proposal?

No. If the winners were all invited per the proposal from NE, from the 10 possibly 11 districts, you would have to have 66 slots. If you include th 12 sign up slots for NE, when they reach 200-ish team like MI, then they will have the possibility for 2 points based slots at their 80 team event... Realistically, tehre is a fari amount of event winner overlap. Often 2/3 of the winning alliance will win some other event as well. So instead of 66, they would only take up about 56 (Assumes 10 repeaters) of the 80 slots thus with the 12 (sign ups), you would also have about 12 getting in from points. Of course, they have a couple of years before they reach that point.

PVCpirate 11-01-2013 18:32

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark McLeod (Post 1213180)
I figured "expand" meant they had to start with something smaller, but still a two field venue with pits probably means a convention center like Hartford, which does have plenty of room.

After a facebook conversation on the NE FIRST page, it seems that you're right, the two field thing is part of their growth strategy.

GaryVoshol 11-01-2013 18:52

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
FiM is up to 11 districts this year, over 200 teams.

So why, even based on last years numbers, does NE get to send 20% of their teams, MAR 12%, and FiM only 9%? And if you divide it by this year's counts, FiM is less than 9%.

When will FIRST recognize that FiM created an atmosphere for growth in teams, and allow more teams to advance? We'd be up to 5 regional events by now too.

Koko Ed 11-01-2013 19:07

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Littleboy (Post 1213176)
Then how do they get so many more spots even though they have 55 less teams than us. They have 154 teams. We have 209 teams. Yet, they get 30 teams going to CMP but we only get 18.

Maybe those championship slots are reserved for the dozen teams that will buy there way to the District Championship.

Quote:

The District Championship will have a set of slots for open registration. 12 slots will be reserved for teams to sign up directly for the District Championship. These teams must also attend one district event but it allows for teams to plan ahead to travel. These slots are likely to follow FRC’s Championship Registration tiered system, where teams who have not attended in a few years get precedence over others. There will be an open waitlist.

DonRotolo 11-01-2013 21:01

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PVCpirate (Post 1213205)
Also, I have a question: does Michigan and/or MAR grant automatic slots at the District Championship for winners of District events like it says in the proposal?

Also no for MAR, although actually winning a district (even as 2nd pick) was enough points to qualify in 2012.

For the CMP slots, I feel that the 30:147 and 18:190 equations are going to have to change. I see a ratio of about 1:7, meaning NEF=21, MAR=14 and FiM=27.

If I were in MI, I'd be howling very loudly at being punished for the successful growing of FRC.

PayneTrain 11-01-2013 22:36

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
FiM should be on the phone figuring out why FiNE gets 12 more slots with 50 fewer teams. I saw that number and my jaw dropped.

If multiple regions are going to switch over to districts soon, why not start accurately apportioning slots? Just saying "You had x regionals for 6x slots before, so you're stuck with that number" sounds careless.

However, as someone who has been watching district models developing in multiple areas, I always like to see progress.

PVCpirate 11-01-2013 23:09

Re: New England District System Proposal
 
From the proposal:

Quote:

There will be 30 teams representing NE FIRST at the FIRST Championship. This follows precedent of 6 * the number of regionals when the region switched. Legacy and Hall of Fame teams will not count into this 30.
They're just following the precedent, the number may(and probably should) be reduced after negotiations with FIRST. It's like the saying goes, shoot for the stars and if you miss, you'll hit the moon.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi