![]() |
New England District System Proposal
NE FIRST has posted a proposal on their website detailing the New England District Model. There are a couple of differences from the Michigan and MAR systems, I wanted to see what others think about it.
Here's a link to the post: http://www.nefirst.org/2013/01/03/nefirstdistricts/ *NOTE* I wasn't exactly sure where to post this, someone please let me know if it should be in a different forum. |
Re: New England District System Proposal
The main question I have is which venue in New England will they use to host at least 80 teams for the district championship. All of the current regionals in New England are the perfect size for 40-50 team regionals, but I can't see any venues that could comfortably hold 80 or more teams.
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
The District Championships aren't as large as all that.
Last year the number of teams attending each were:
With the point system it's easy to restrict attendance to what the venue will support. |
Re: New England District System Proposal
Based on current teams, how many teams will be playing in this district system?
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
Quote:
vs
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
Quote:
"We will expand the size to at least 80 teams, and provide two fields with the same amount of matches in other districts. The combined regional planning committees will form to become the District Championship Committee and bring the best that each NE event has to offer. Locations have not been decided as of this time." I was very surprised to read this, it's a decent idea but I can't think of anywhere in New England with enough space. |
Re: New England District System Proposal
Then how do they get so many more spots even though they have 55 less teams than us. They have 154 teams. We have 209 teams. Yet, they get 30 teams going to CMP but we only get 18.
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
Quote:
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
Quote:
What I find interesting is that the 147 team NE District sends 30 teams while the 190 team FiM District sends 18. |
Re: New England District System Proposal
Quote:
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
Its a good proposal. I would go as far as to say a really good proposal.
The exception I would have is that 30+ Championship slots would be going to a pool of 147 teams. If the Championship was by population I would thing that 147/2500(ish) *400=23.5 would be the reasonable number I would give NE. In other words I would give them 23 or 24 slots. If 30 go to 147 teams, you have about a 1/5 chance. If 18/190 get to go, you have a worse than 1/10 chance... ************************************************** ***** Personally if I was FIRST I would give NE 24 slots if it was up to me. ************************************************** ** If I was NE, I would submit for the full 30 slots and have FIRST talk me down. I don't think 30 is an unreasonable number to request from a District Championship (MAR and FiM included). |
Re: New England District System Proposal
To be clear this is just a proposal and I would assume many of the details will change by the time the negotiations with FIRST are completed. I like the bigger district championship, I say the more teams who can attend the event the better.
Also, I have a question: does Michigan and/or MAR grant automatic slots at the District Championship for winners of District events like it says in the proposal? |
Re: New England District System Proposal
I agree that it looks really good.
The one thing I am disappointed in at this point is that there is only 1 EI slot but 2 RAS and 5 CA. To be fair to the importance of that award I think it should be 2 EI at least. Especially since the other awards give you points to put toward your total to compete for the other slots available but EI, CA, and RAS do not. |
Re: New England District System Proposal
Quote:
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi