![]() |
Kinect in auton allowed
|
Re: Kinect in auton allowed
I see no benefit, or very little. Kinect is cool but not particularly effective.
|
Re: Kinect in auton allowed
Quote:
The students could control it just fine, but lowering the bridge required lifting your knee above your gut, so when one of our mentors tried it, he almost fell over trying to raise the bridge-arm :P That being said, however, it can be useful for autonomous timing. Say you and another team both shoot at the same goal during auton. You can avoid any possible shot conflicts by writing a simple hand-raise-to-shoot kinect program. |
Re: Kinect in auton allowed
I see what the q&a answer is, but it makes no sense. If some one is controlling the robot via Kinect, then it isn't really autonomous, is it? It would be under operator control!
|
Re: Kinect in auton allowed
Quote:
|
Re: Kinect in auton allowed
There's still zero incentive to use a Kinect this year. The only reason a Kinect would be "better" than a normal autonomous mode would be if you had to react to some unforeseen event on the field, such as an opponent trying to hit you. Since once again, the autonomous modes are segregated, there should be no scenario that wouldn't be better and more repeatedly executed in a completely autonomous fashion.
|
Re: Kinect in auton allowed
I think the Kinect is a very good idea. It is a much better sensor compared to the Axis camera and can be used to offload vision targeting to a computer on the robot vs. using bandwidth to the driver station.
It is certainly not a waste of time to learn how to use it, especially since it has a nice sensor for distance. |
Re: Kinect in auton allowed
Quote:
|
Re: Kinect in auton allowed
Quote:
Having said all of this, control via Kinect is cool whenever it occurs. |
Re: Kinect in auton allowed
Quote:
There is no hybrid autonomous. |
Re: Kinect in auton allowed
Quote:
|
Re: Kinect in auton allowed
Thanks. I missed the link and only read the rules. Derp. :o
My experience with Kinect would think this is not a great input device for behind the line due to the ease of other people getting into the frame of reference. The IR remote might be useful though. |
Re: Kinect in auton allowed
Phew, good news. We were worried we wouldn't be able to use it again :cool:
|
Re: Kinect in auton allowed
Does a Kinect on the Driver Station have to be pointed at the drivers? I'm currently looking for a rule that prohibits directing it at the field and using it as a sensor for the robot that isn't on the robot. Somehow I have a feeling the GDC wouldn't approve of this...
Who knows? Maybe it could be useful. Pathfinding, maybe? |
Re: Kinect in auton allowed
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi