![]() |
Round Robot(s)
Who all out there besides 3574 is doing a round robot and round bumpers?
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
I'd love to see a photo of that.
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Fourth..ed? Yeah some pictures please! although hopefully you took some before the 'bot was bagged...
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
1 Attachment(s)
Here is a picture that was taken yesterday morning. The freesbee colector had not been instaled yet, but we'll have a better picture before midnight ;)
27.5 inches heigh 35.5 inches Diameter As of yesterday she weight 85 pounds and we expect her not to weight more than 100 pounds by the time she's ready for competition. |
Re: Round Robot(s)
Not quite round, but octagonal!
(we do have a shooter, just wasn't ready in time for Suffield Shakedown.) ![]() |
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
Its so tiny and its hanging. |
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Which Regional(s) are you attending? I enjoyed competing with you guys in Seattle last year. It was amazing to see a rookie team so inspired and prepared to compete with everyone else. Team Mean Machine is attending Portland and Spokane since Seattle and Ellensburg filled before we could get a spot. Good Luck!
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Our team had a round robot two years ago for Logomotion. It was convex for approximately 270 degrees, and had a slightly concave section for the remaining 90 degrees. It was completely wrapped in conformal bumpers. This year we have round corners. This totally befuddled the inspector at the LA scrimmage. I would attach photos, but I'm on my iPad now, and can't easily do that.
We were somewhat thwarted by the mid-build clarification that imposed a new over-restrictive bumper rule for round robots or robots with round corners. Two years ago, we were thwarted by an inter-competition rule change that did the same for our previous round robot's concave bumper section. Now, we're very focused on overcoming the consequence of the new restriction, with something (anything) before our first competition. Edit: just saw the picture from 3574. That looks really neat! What is your base material? It looks like a solid carbon laminate. |
Re: Round Robot(s)
I'm curious about your round bumpers. On our prior round robot, we laminated 5 layers of a 5/32" mahogany plywood, dry, to make our ~14-1/2" radius bumpers.
This year, we needed a tighter 8" inside radius. We also wanted a very light bumper to aid in climbing. To get this, we made a birch-balsa-birch sandwich, similar to what was used in the brittish DeHaviland Mosquito bomber of World War II. We had to soak the birch for over two days to get it pliable enough, and then had to let everything dry on forms before laminating. This was a LOT of work, and took the efforts of ten students from start to finish. We learned a lot of ways to miscommunicate ideas and instructions. Your curved wood is very uniform and clean. What did you use to get this great result? |
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Team 2620 isn't round nor a rectangle ;) *hint* corner climb *hint*
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Another picture with finished bumpers in competition, looks like those might even be reversible with that seem down the middle.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/daniele...n/photostream/ |
Re: Round Robot(s)
Out of curiosity, is there really that much usable space created by using a round robot as opposed to the standard polygon shape?
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
For the circular robot C = 2πr. Since C = 112, the radius of the circle is 56/π or approximately 17.825 inches, and it's area is πr^2, which is 3161/π or approximately 998.220 square inches. For a rectangular robot, we have 112 = 2l + 2w, and A = lw, or A = l(56 - l). With some calculus, we can find that the maximum area occurs when the robot is a 28x28 square, with an internal area of 784 square inches. In other words, a circular robot can have up to about 28.339% more usable area inside it's frame perimeter than a rectangular one. You could run the numbers for any other polygon, if you really wanted to, but I'll leave that up to you (I'm too lazy). You'll find that as you increase the number of sides on your polygon, the maximum area will approach, but never reach, that of a circle with the same perimeter. As for how useful this extra internal area is, that can only really be answered on a case-by-case basis by each time based on how much space their subsystems use. |
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
From a strategic perspective, a circular robot would be harder to block, because any typical rectangular robot would just kind of "slide" to one side in a collision (though on the flipside, this would also make them less effective as defense robots).
From what I can see in the pictures of 2836 and 4743, there seems to be a lot of unused space inside their perimeter, but their robots don't seem to do a whole lot. I don't see any shooter on 2836's bot, and 4743's just looks like a simple 1-point dumper. I think they'd be able to use more of that space if their robots had more functionality, i.e a floor pickup or a 30-point climb. Sorry if this post sounds harsh towards these two teams. I don't intend to put your robots down, just making some observations about how you've used your internal space. |
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
1 Attachment(s)
Here is a picture of our FIRST alliance ;) at the Portland Autodek Regional. In the picture is clear that we are indeed round.
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
The nerd inside me really loved it when they spun with their lights on :D |
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Round Robot(s)
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:26. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi