Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Regional Competitions (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   2013 Alliance Selection Results (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=114555)

Kpchem 09-03-2013 15:23

Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
 
Autodesk Oregon Regional

1)955-2471-2046 (W)
2)3812-2130-3145 (F)
3)4127-997-2147 (SF)
4)4488-1318-4057 (QF)
5)360-1425-3711 (SF)
6)2635-1359-2811 (QF)
7)2733-1540-2557 (QF)
8)956-847-488 (QF)

There were no declines

JM_987 09-03-2013 15:51

Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
 
San Diego

1) 987-254-1138
2) 399-1538-2339
3) 2984-2486-4322
4) 589-3476-1726
5) 4583-4401-4486
6) 4014-2543-3255
7) 1159-2496-4139
8) 2827-599-3925

No declines

qzrrbz 09-03-2013 16:02

Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JM_987 (Post 1245525)
San Diego

1) 987-254-1138
2) 399-1538-2339
3) 2984-2486-4322
4) 589-3476-1726
5) 4583-4401-4486
6) 4014-2543-3255
7) 1159-2496-4139
8) 2827-599-3925

No declines

Why was 399 second seed??? On tiebreak (auton) they were way behind 2984. I don't get it...

EricH 09-03-2013 16:06

Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qzrrbz (Post 1245534)
Why was 399 second seed??? On tiebreak (auton) they were way behind 2984. I don't get it...

The tiebreak applied to 987, not 2984. 2984 only had 18 QS, 399 and 987 had 20--and QS is the first sort.

QS, then auto, then climb, then telop/foul, then random.

twetherbee 09-03-2013 16:06

399 was second because they were undefeated.

Nuttyman54 09-03-2013 16:07

Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qzrrbz (Post 1245534)
Why was 399 second seed??? On tiebreak (auton) they were way behind 2984. I don't get it...

399 was 10-0-0, 2984 was 9-1-0. Tiebreak doesn't apply there. The tiebreak was between 987 and 399.

qzrrbz 09-03-2013 16:13

Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nuttyman54 (Post 1245540)
399 was 10-0-0, 2984 was 9-1-0. Tiebreak doesn't apply there. The tiebreak was between 987 and 399.

Grumble -- I was looking at the "final standings" as all were 8-0-0. Sigh. Silly thing still hadn't refreshed. Sigh...

Never mind! :p

Jeremy Germita 09-03-2013 16:16

Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qzrrbz (Post 1245534)
Why was 399 second seed??? On tiebreak (auton) they were way behind 2984. I don't get it...

987 and 399 were the only undefeated teams. First order sort is still QP

qzrrbz 09-03-2013 17:07

Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jeremypg399 (Post 1245542)
987 and 399 were the only undefeated teams. First order sort is still QP

Yeh... was looking at the standings for 8 matches, thinking it was done -- dunno why red alliance stuff doesn't always refresh nicely.

was an observation based upon incomplete information. :-)

that's my story, and i'm sticking to it!

bitty 09-03-2013 21:23

Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
 
1) 1718-33-4779 (W)
2) 2851-3539-1 (SF)
3) 67-494-308 (QF)
4) 1025-4130-503 (QF)
5) 2960-2612-548 (SF)
6) 51-3414-3604 (F)
7) 4384-573-1701 (QF)
8) 2834-835-2137 (QF)

sammyjalex 09-03-2013 22:09

Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
 
New York City


1) 1635 334 375 SF
2) 4571 3059 3419 QF
3) 1155 2344 1396 QF
4) 771 522 514 QF
5) 694 3137 4797 W
6) 810 884 353 SF
7) 3171 1660 4122 F
8) 2601 369 3017 QF

No Declines

MisterG 11-03-2013 16:34

Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
 
Lake Superior Regional 2013

1) 2220 2177 3755 Q
2) 2538 3883 4181 Q
3) 2526 2705 3102 S
4) 4054 2977 2264 S
5) 4009 4228 4703 Q
6) 4215 1816 93 Q
7) 2052 2062 4011 W
8) 3276 3277 4539 F

2052 declined 2538 while 2052 was in the 8th position.

Lil' Lavery 11-03-2013 17:08

Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JM_987 (Post 1245525)
San Diego

1) 987-254-1138
2) 399-1538-2339
3) 2984-2486-4322
4) 589-3476-1726
5) 4583-4401-4486
6) 4014-2543-3255
7) 1159-2496-4139
8) 2827-599-3925

No declines

Granted, I hardly watched any of the SD qualifiers, but I went back and watched most of the eliminations. How on Earth did 4322 fall that far in the draft? They were terrific!

Cory 11-03-2013 17:47

Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery (Post 1246707)
Granted, I hardly watched any of the SD qualifiers, but I went back and watched most of the eliminations. How on Earth did 4322 fall that far in the draft? They were terrific!

They were quite high on our pick list.

mtb604 11-03-2013 19:42

Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery (Post 1246707)
Granted, I hardly watched any of the SD qualifiers, but I went back and watched most of the eliminations. How on Earth did 4322 fall that far in the draft? They were terrific!

We wondered the same thing! We started to get nervous when there were only 3 picks left. Thought maybe we'd done something to offend all of the alliance captains.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:09.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi