![]() |
2013 MAR Standings
1 Attachment(s)
Since I haven't seen anyone else start a thread about it, here is what I've calculated as the MAR standings as of week 2 (ie - one event)...
As always, all questions and/or comments are welcome |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Week 3 was exciting in the MAR events. Attached is the week 3 update for the current point standings.
NOTE: usfirst.org has team 293 listed as winning the Spirit Award at TCNJ. It was actually team 203. This is corrected in the standings list. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Your list has some serious issues with the SCH event. You only put in points for qualification matches. The data for draft, elimination, and awards is all missing. For example, 341 earned 70 points at SCH, not 20.
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I fixed it and added a few more tweaks. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Awesome, thanks. But I have another question. Under team 709 you have zero points and zero events. However, both Spyder and TBA say that they competed at SCH. TBA says they went 5-7; but, Spyder says that they went 0-1. I am guessing that they got red-carded during their first match, can anyone who was at SCH confirm?
EDIT: Sorry to be so nit-picky about this, but it seems like you gave the District EI award winners an auto-bid to MAR Champs. I was under the impression that only the District CA winners received this auto-bid. The EI winners are invited to compete for the MAR EI award, but their robot doesn't auto-qualify to compete. The MAR supplemental rules http://www.midatlanticrobotics.com/2...emental-rules/ make no mention of the EI award under the "Qualifying and Registering to Compete at the Region Championship" section. Although, this document is not the most reliable, as it refers to there being 50 spots for championship and 60 spots for championship in the same paragraph. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
709 didn't have the best of weekends. They had robot issues and did not get a working robot / inspected robot until their last match of the day. They played but lost. The FIRST site has them DQ'ed for all the matches except for that one.
Had they been inspected and on the field, they would have been 5-7. (Or better since they would have contributed points to their alliance!!) They got a standing ovation when they did appear. It takes a lot of desire to hang in there working on a robot right up to the last second. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
The MAR documents are ... confusing ... to me, to say the least. Chairman's gives an auto-bid, so it gets no MAR points. EI gets no points, either. Last year, EI winners got to compete IIRC. If they don't get to auto-bid, shouldn't they be getting points? Currently, I've got it set to auto-bid the team. That way, the worst-case that I see is that some teams will be invited that I listed as no-gos, which is a good thing (we all know it will happen, too). After all, in some form, the EI teams will be there. They just may not be on the field. As for the 50 vs 60, that'll get ironed out after next week's events (according to the document ;) ) |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
Thank you for understanding. Also, it seems like I misread the paragraph, thanks for the correction. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Here's the MAR Event Schedule and Rankings as we've compiled them.
I previously published the MAR Event Schedule, but unintentionally made it private a few weeks ago. Schedule: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...kE&usp=sharing Rankings: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...0E&usp=sharing |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
Even though I've said it before, I will repeat: The robot that you guys put together absolutely ROCKS! |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Has MAR officially stated how many teams will attend the MAR Championship? All I've seen is "at least 50."
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
We might have to go further down the list this year - Lehigh isn't as convenient for most teams, and a number of teams are prequalified for CMP (25, 103, 341). 365 seems to be skipping MAR CMP and attending Chesapeake instead. I would be happy to see MAR CMP shrink a bit and go to a smaller/closer venue, and reduce the registration fee, but I think FIRST opposes that. Once the region gets bigger it would make sense, but it seemed like a struggle to get to 53 last year. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
The Philly/Trenton area is probably the geographic center of MAR. Philly was a bus ride for us last year, but ~2-2.5 hours to Lehigh means it's an overnight trip now, and I'm sure other teams are in the same boat. I understand that FIRST wants the prestige of a big event, but $4K + lodging is a good chunk of change, especially when you're looking at World Championships 2 weeks later. We really just aren't big enough to be justifying a 50-60 team regional championship. Michigan has 206 teams and 64 attend MSC. We're at 109 teams this year, and this was an unusually big year for growth. I didn't run numbers for PA, but NJ has had minimal growth up until this year. NJ had 56 teams in 2006 and was at 62 teams in 2012 (peaked at 64 in 2010). If you look at it, there really isn't much difference in size between a large district event and MAR CMP. We scraped together 53 teams last year, Bridgewater is hosting 43 teams for their district event. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
I updated the sheet with week 4 results. Not official by any stretch, but good for people who want to see where they stand. Let me know if you find any errors.
Anyone with 50+ points is a near-lock for MAR CMP. I highlighted those teams in pink, and also highlighted Bridgewater teams who earned 25+ points at their first event (45 teams in total). The real cutoff is likely to be lower (possibly significantly lower), so don't despair if you're on the bubble. 2013 MAR Standings |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
1 Attachment(s)
Attached is the week 4 update of my MAR Standings sheet. If you find any errors, please let me know.
Since there are teams who haven't played all of their events, I have the teams sorted by their points average. I've got two weeks to figure out how to deal with teams (like 303) that are playing in 3 district events (only the first two count). |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
That doesn't mean I like booking a hotel to volunteer there, Temple was a shorter commute for me than any district. However, I am interested to see a new venue. Maybe we will keep changing venues as needed. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
And this list of coordinates: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...9&postcount=25 I found the center of all MAR teams to be 40.39724, -74.8769 (somewhere in Lambertville, NJ). This is: 32.3 miles to the Liacouras Center in Philidelphia, 28.5 miles to Stabler Arena in Bethlehem, and 14.2 miles to the Sun National Bank center in Trenton. Interestingly, the new MAR championship is closer to the center of teams than the old MAR championship. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
222 is from Tunkhannock.
2559 is from Harrisburg. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
Another would be the team-funding-inverse-weighted center, basing the weight of a team off of the inverse of it's funding, thus giving less-well funded teams more weight due to their difficulties in traveling. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
Here, 40.38577925, -74.95323414, is the center weighted by average district score. After all, why should a team's location matter if they don't attend the championships? Either way, it's still in Lambertville, just a little farther west, suggesting that the good teams are pretty evenly distributed over MAR. The inverse-funding center sounds like the best idea, but unfortunately I don't think that that information is publicly available. I tried to replicate it by finding the inverse-size-of-sponsor-list center. I know that some sponsors give more than others and that this isn't perfect, but hopefully the size of the sponsor list roughly correlates to team funding. Anyway, that center is 40.44366073, -74.80339903. It's in a place called Ringoes, NJ. It's a little farther north and a little farther east than the center of teams. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
The center of teams that attended MAR championships last year is 40.32755, -74.9932. It is further south and west than the other centers I calculated. It’s in New Hope, PA. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
It is also important to note that one of the goals of MAR is to help grow FRC participation in the supported region. I don't think anyone would disagree that the MAR Champs this year is in a lower team population area. By holding the event in such an area there is a greater chance of new teams being formed there than say in Philly, where there are already many teams with much smaller room to grow new teams.
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Well, we could always build a new arena in Lambertville...
I think the reason for choosing Lehigh for this years MAR championship is because the arrangements were more favorable than what Temple was offering. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
222 is happy we only have to travel 1.5 hours to Lehigh!
I know there are many teams upset by the fact they will have to spend money for lodging, but think about the teams like 222, 1143 & 4285 from NEPA that have to pay for lodging at every competition we go to. MAR is good in that we get to play more for the same price, but we don't get to see the cost savings other teams in the district get to see. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
I like Lehigh, and I think it is pretty fair due to what Cliff stated. I think it will prove to be a great event. Full disclosure: I never liked attending an event at Temple. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
I just updated the standings for after BR alliance selections, let me know if you spot any errors.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...G1vR 0E#gid=0 |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
1 341 2 2590 3 225 4 316 5 1676 6 11 7 3974 8 103 9 293 10 2729 11 56 12 3314 13 365 14 222 15 2607 16 303 17 1640 18 193 19 4575 20 816 21 272 22 2016 23 1218 24 1089 25 1403 26 486 27 2539 28 4285 29 75 30 25 31 869 32 714 33 1367 34 219 35 1228 36 1391 37 224 38 433 39 1881 40 1495 41 1143 42 1626 43 1370 44 4361 45 2559 46 1279 On the bubble (4 slots available): 3340 - 50 pts (@BR) 4342 - 48 pts 136 - 47 pts 3123 - 47 pts 357 - 47 pts 223 - 47 pts (@BR) 555 -42 pts (@BR) 4475 - 42 pts (@BR) If the CA winner at BR is outside the top 50, there are only 3 slots available. Keep in mind that more than a few teams declined last year, so teams in the 51-60 range have a good shot to squeak in via declines. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Thanks Scott,
However, I know of 2 teams that have qualified that won't be at the MAR Championship as they are attending a different regional on the same weekend. I also looked at the floor plan for the MAR Championship that has a pit layout for 50 teams. So I would think any team 50 or better is in, at this point. So that makes bubble teams 52+. The question remains how many declines there are of those that have already qualified. If I remember correctly, last year MAR needed to reach down to the 60th seed to get 50 teams. What it will be this year is anyone's guess. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
We'll have to see how many declines we get before we have the final list for Lehigh. As far as I know, 365 and 87 are the only teams at Baltimore next weekend, and 87 is already eliminated from MAR CMP. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Standings should be complete now. Here are the top 50, I only did the tiebreak for the final slot. Also put the teams up for CA, EI, and RAS at Lehigh. There are 2 slots for CA and EI this year, still one slot for RAS.
1 341 2 2590 3 1676 4 225 5 316 6 11 7 3974 8 103 9 293 10 2729 11 56 12 3314 13 365 14 2607 15 222 16 303 17 1640 18 193 19 4575 20 816 21 2016 22 272 23 1218 24 1089 25 1403 26 486 27 714 28 2539 29 4285 30 75 31 25 32 869 33 1367 34 1391 35 1228 36 219 37 224 38 433 39 1881 40 1495 41 1143 42 1626 43 1370 44 4361 45 2559 46 1279 47 3340 48 4475 49 4342 50 3123 - tiebreak (most elim points) Chairman's Award Competitors: 11 75 (also up for EI) 433 1218 2590 2729 Engineering Inspiration Competitors: 75 (also up for CA) 321 (won twice) 1403 1676 3142 Rookie All Star Competitors: 4460 (won twice) 4475 4575 4637 4653 |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
It's interesting to note that team 2495 won Lenape but is not in the top 50. Five teams need to decline for them to get their invitation to Lehigh.
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
I was told that 2016 will not attend Lehigh, they are saving their money for St Louis.
That's at least 1 more slot... |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Congratulations to all the top teams heading to Lehigh. Double congratulations to all of the teams that have made the finals in two district events. (7 teams, if I'm not miscounting.)
316 341 714 1676 2590 3314 3974 Miss Daisy is the only team with two district wins, showing what amazing parity there has been in MAR this year - no clear favorite for a championship next weekend. (My money would go on 2590, but as 56, 293, and 224 proved at TCNJ, Nemesis is not invincible.) I am so impressed that 1676, 3314, and 714 worked with the same alliance in back-to-back events, going home with Finalist ribbons the first time, but earning a blue banner this afternoon. That's loyalty! |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
Also a huge shame because they are a rare sight in MAR this year - someone with a floor intake (and one that actually works!) http://www.thebluealliance.com/team/2495 |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
1 Attachment(s)
Since I started the topic (and I'm finally home from Bridgewater), here's my list of the standings in MAR as of today. The tiebreakers are not in the sheet.
All I can say is ... it's been a great (but exhausting) day that I will be repeating in just 3 days. :ahh: Is that an indication that there is something truly terribly wrong with me? As always, if there's an error, please let me know. I may not be awake enough to reply before the start of drop-off Wednesday, but I will try... |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Thanks DELurker and Scott from 2590 for updating this. Taking a quick glance at this, tiebreakers do cause some teams to move around in order, including some on the bubble. I know the final rankings were generated in person at Bridgewater-Raritan and that FIRST was notified so that teams will get invitations tomorrow morning.
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
I volunteered at bridgewater today, and watching us slide from 39th all the way down to 55th was the most painful thing I've ever experienced. EDIT: Teams I'm aware of that are not attending MAR: 2016 (Buckeye Chairmans) 25 (Einstein) 103 (HOF) 341 (HOF) 365 (HOF/Chesapeake) That 5 puts us in mar, plus any additional declines which there are bound to be |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
They posted the cumulative results on the MAR website: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1407395/2013...06%20Final.pdf
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
I updated my GDrive sheet with the correct rankings, and have been adding a note as teams officially register for MAR champs. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
103 is registered, and I'm relatively sure they're attending.
25 and 341 are not attending, in large part because they just finished competing in Vegas and moving all those people and equipment for back-to-back competitions on opposites sides of the country is a pain. 87 and 365 are registered for the Chesapeake regional this weekend, and don't look like they will be attending MAR champs. 25, 103, 341, 365, and 2016 have already secured bids for Champs in St. Louis. All but 103 appear to be skipping Lehigh. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Looks like we're done with registration for the day, 33 teams are officially registered. Hopefully we fill out the event roster early tomorrow. Michigan is a bit ahead of us, they have 56 (of 64) teams officially registered.
Assuming that 341, 365, 2016, and 25 are skipping the event, that moves the cutoff down to 54. Last year we had to reach down to the 57th ranked team to hit 50 at the event, and there are more top-tier teams skipping the event this year, so I wouldn't be surprised to see it drop lower than last year. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Geez, seeing that my team isnt registered yet is giving me a heart attack.
:ahh: :ahh: :ahh: :ahh: |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
For those curious, we are officially registered, so they are starting to go down "the bubble"
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
Hallelujah! |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Still only 38 teams officially registered, and none ranked beneath 55 on MAR standings. We have four confirmed/semi-confirmed declines so far, and if the #55 team (2495) was invited, there's at least one more decline out there. Curious if the rest of the teams are simply not registered yet, or if there are more declines.
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
That being said, many team members are planning on making the trip up to Lehigh (myself included) to volunteer and to support our WFFA and DLA entries. For those of you who have not yet been invited but are close to the cutoff (it's moving towards higher and higher ranks) be patient. Odds are, that ~10-15 teams will decline their spot to the MAR Championship when all is said and done. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
List of qualified and registered teams for MAR CMP, as of noon
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23510373/MAR%20CMP%202013.pdf file updated again, 44 teams registered, Rank 57 is lowest ranked team attending so far |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
40 teams now. Robbe just registered.
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Yup, team 56 is in. I think a few teams are in the same boat as us - we were planning on attending all along, it's just been a crazy couple of days trying to coordinate payments and confirmations between the school, MAR and FIRST. It took this long for us to get the paperwork done. There may be a couple more "unregistered" teams going through the same.
Pro-tip: Always be very, very nice to the administrative assistants at your school. You never know when you'll need to call in a favor, and they are the best (sometime only) ones who can get this sort of thing done quickly. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Just heard the news that 4460 is in and probably the 50th team!
The question is who are the 10 declines. I expect another of my teams, 1495 declined due to funding. With 25, 341, 365, 2016, who are the other 5? |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
303 2539 219 1881 4361 3123 136 1647 1807 555 |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
Very sorry to hear about 1495, who was very under-the-radar, but still managed to finish in the top half of a stacked Hatboro-Horsham event, then went on to be 341 and 225's partner on the winning alliance at Chestnut Hill... a very simple, but extremely consistent and effective machine. I can't wait to see them at district events again next year. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
1 Attachment(s)
As of tonight, 44 teams have fully registered. I've updated my form and attached it. I'm a little surprised nobody noticed that I had completely missed two teams. :o
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
341, 365, 303, 2016, 2539, 25, 219, 1495, 1881, 4361, 136, 3123, 1647, 555, 1807, 4460 It looks like 42 MAR points is going to be this year's cutoff (currently). The next three teams on deck are 1168, 1923, 3151 (according to my numbers, which may differ from MAR's because I'm too tired to check right now) with 41 MAR points. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
For those who have the time, the event may still be looking for volunteers. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
1923 is registered.
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
As has 1881, anyone have any info on the last one? 1647 perhaps?
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
I really hope 4361 is able to attend. I'd love to speak with them again at the Regional CMP.
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
It also seams that team 11 is already registered for Worlds but are attending MAR champs anyway: Team List
Correct me if im wrong? |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
11 qualified for Worlds by winning the Palmetto Regional Week 1, and 103 qualifies for Worlds automatically every year by winning the Championship Chairman's Award in 2003, and thus entering the FRC Hall of Fame. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
The only practical consequence would be if 11 or 103 ended up winning the entire event. In that case, they would consume one of MAR's 3 CMP auto-bids for the event winner. In MAR, these 3 slots cannot pass down the list if a team has already qualified, so we would have 13 qualifiers at most. The same would apply if 11 won one of the two CA slots for championships. Interestingly, in FiM, the 3 winner spots can pass down to the next "points-based" team in the queue. This is something that I would like to see MAR implement for next year, I though that was a FIRST restriction, but if Michigan can do it, I imagine we could as well. FiM: http://firstinmichigan.org/FRC_2013/...Supplement.pdf MAR: http://www.midatlanticrobotics.com/2...emental-rules/ |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
In 2012, if I remember right, points earned at the region championship were multiplied (tripled?) and added to points earned at districts? Will this stand for 2013?
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
Also, with 49 teams registered at this moment, is it logical to assume that we will be stuck at 49 teams? By my math it seems that we will have 98 qualification matches....I don't see so much need in having to have qualification matches tomorrow night...(assuming math for matches is (#of teams*number of matches per team(12))/6)) |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
the dropbox link in a previous post now has the latest update.
49 teams have registered 7 MAR teams have registered for the FIRST Championships 3 of those teams will also be at the MAR Championships FIRST Team 1923, Ranked 61 is the lowest ranked team to accept so far Points earned at the championships are counted 3x in final rankings and tie-breaks Good luck to all the teams. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
"The 7 award spots may not be filled by any team(s) other than the 7 award winners even if one of the 7 award winning teams chooses to decline their spot. The only exception is when a member of the winning alliance has already been awarded a slot by winning the MAR Region Championship Chairman’s, Engineering Inspiration, or Rookie All Star award. In this case, a team will be added from the top ranked teams." Different than FiM. Don't know if it was changed for this year. Will have to find out. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Just an FYI As of 4:00 PM team 484 was registered for Lehigh
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
if the teams above couldn't make a commitment then so it is. the MAR 2013 supplemental rules state that "if any of the eligible teams are unable to attend, choose not to attend, or do not respond by Tuesday at noon, the next team in ranked or der will be eligible to take their place. Eligibility will continue to move down through the ranks until all 50 places at the Region Championship are filled. This makes it vital for teams to notify us quickly if they do not plan to attend." As it stands the teams above had more than 24hr past the deadline to make their decision and that is against what the MAR rules state We had less than 24 hrs before the championship starts to scramble to notify team members, arrange transportation, load vehicles and everything else that goes along with getting ready. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
I also heard that, but I cannot confirm it.
I also heard similar stories about 103 and 25. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
Total Points = MAR_CMP_Points*3 + SumD1_D2 Points** The idea here is that the Championship points are worth 60% of your final score and points awarded prior to the Championship are worth 40% of your final score. **SumD1_D2 is the total points earned after a teams first two district events, a team competing at a third event does not earn points at this event. Also, in the event that Team 11 were to win the MAR CMP or it's Chairman's award (or EI) then they would, in theory, cause a spot to 'disappear' from the system in the same way that 341 did last year.... Team 11 has a special incentive to compete at the MAR CMP since it's a continuation of their Chairman's award process... (103 would also remove a spot should they win MAR CMP as well) |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
I updated the google doc for Thurday. As expected, nothing really changed. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqCax1FanfCIdDNoMWw1empFTUExNGZPaklvRG1vR 0E#gid=20
Anyway, 1367 was signed up on usfirst.org, but didn't show up. So we only have 49 teams for Lehigh, just 6 more than the largest district event. EDIT: Just updated for Friday. |
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
1 Attachment(s)
Here is the "completed" document that I started back in week two to open up this thread.
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Why are the columns for TCNJ and Bridgewater highlighted?
|
Re: 2013 MAR Standings
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:49. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi